The DewLine broke the story (at least as far as I can tell)...
Everyone else is jumping on it as another fail for the F-35...
But what's the truth? The below chart is from the DL...
The facts as I see them...
1. The F-35B...supposedly the weakest of the bunch is meeting KPP requirements already. That fact is getting lost in this story. The "B" will be a winner. Expect it to sell extremely well, especially with so many Navies acquiring LHD type ships.
2. The F-35A misses its KPP by only 6 miles. This will be an extremely easy fix. That's getting lost in this story.
3. The F-35C is (like the "B") meeting requirements.
In short, although I'm a fan of Trimble (like I am of Bill---I just think he's waaaaaay off the reservation when it comes to the F-35 program) but he made a non-story into a story.
One thing is for sure. News of the F-35 drives web traffic. Even here.
UPDATE:
Something about Trimble's post sparked a memory of this debate before...especially the fact that the F-35B is performing so well range wise. Then it hit me...This post by Sweetman! The US and its allies will be gaining Stealth, Speed, Superior Avionics and Extended Range with the F-35. The parties that choose to replace AV-8B Harriers with F-35B's will see Amphibious Ships finally able to perform not only legacy missions but everything from Fleet Defense to Sea Control Missions. The F-35 in general and the F-35B in particular are poised to be game changers.