Tuesday, November 02, 2010

Lexington Institute Swings and Misses.


This is their latest...I've highlighted all the inside the beltway bullshit that they use to describe this insanity...

Franco-British Pact Provides Foundation For New Security Architecture


On the heels of its recently released defense review, the new British government has moved aggressively to restructure its strategic relationships both with Washington and its allies in Europe. As part of a new agreement on defense cooperation, Great Britain and France will substantially deepen their already extensive security collaboration.
For example, Britain and France will cooperate in one of the most significant areas of national security and sovereignty: testing the safety and reliability of nuclear warheads. The two countries are likely to develop arrangements for sharing the use of the new aircraft carriers now under construction. London and Paris have announced their attention to develop a joint rapid deployment force. According to the Financial Times, defense contractors in Britain and France want this week’s summit between David Cameron, the UK prime minister, and Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, to boost bilateral industrial collaboration to help create a new generation of unmanned surveillance and combat aircraft programs.
The Cameron government strongly asserts that its efforts to draw closer to France do not constitute a rejection of the so-called special relationship with the U.S. Rather, it is a way for the U.K. to retain sufficient military relevance so as to be worthy of the special relationship. The ability to leverage French military capabilities and defense industrial resources will help to ensure that the U.K. remains Washington’s most capable ally.
The outstanding question is how the United States will respond to the U.K.-French initiative. The security relationship between France and the United States has a long and some might say checkered history. Paris’s recent decision to re-enter NATO’s integrated command structure and to deploy a significant combat force to Afghanistan have gone a long way to healing the decades-old breach with Washington. But the integration of French and military forces now gives the former a degree of control over the actions of the latter that are likely to give Washington pause in how it treats its closest ally.
Washington should consider the possibility that the Franco-British defense relationship could serve as the basis for a new strategic architecture for the defense of NATO and as a model for building partner capacity in other regions of interest. The sharing of military capabilities, the provision for mutual support and the integration of defense industrial capabilities are all examples of ways in which regional partners and allies can create a robust defensive capability greater than the mere sum of the parts.
The Obama Administration needs to consider ways by which it can leverage the growing interest of major regional allies and partners to cooperate more closely. Collaboration with France and the U.K. in nuclear weapons safety and surety is one potential area of interest. Another is in development of the next generations of tactical fighters and unmanned aerial vehicles. A third could be lift and logistics to support expeditionary operations. Both France and the U.K. have expressed interest in developing a European-wide missile defense capability, something to which the United States can contribute. By leveraging the Franco-British entente, the United States can not only maintain the special relationship with London and deepen its defense ties with France but create a model for empowering security partners in the Middle East and East Asia.
Daniel Goure, Ph.D.

What a load of trash.  Lexington Institute is better than this trash.

6 comments :

  1. Yeah, as France becomes ever more Muslim I want to see how great that "sharing" of military resources is when the UK has to fight some Islamists. The Paris suburbs will be in flames as French military assets are used against their co-religionists.

    This seems doomed to failure the first time either London or Paris takes some military action that the other disagrees with. You either have to ask permission or you end up dragging your "partner" into wars they didn't want to join.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're exactly right. That's what I don't get about all this. France is on a hair trigger to destabilize...no wants to talk about it but the Muslim problem is severe in that country (and don't take my wording to be Nazi like but it is a problem involving the increasing Muslim presence and the lack of assimilation to Western values) and if they really wanted to save money and get bang for the buck then a partnership with the US would have been ideal...

    The USS America class LHD would provide the same capabilities with greater savings ... and a partnership with the US nuclear weapons industry would have been absolutely brilliant.

    These guys have totally fucked themselves and there is no way to make it seem right.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also, France still fairly regularly intervenes in their former African colonies. How is London gonna react when UK assets are used to gun down some black African rebels/terrorists in Niger or Mauritania? France sent 100 troops to Niger just last month. They do this all the time. This seems crazy.

    I understand shared R&D, shared production. But not sharing real assets.

    ReplyDelete
  4. According to you guys this project will undoubtedly results in failure. What I want to know is, what crystal ball are you looking at that gives you this amazingly correct picture of the future? Why not let the brits and french try this out? See if it works? If it doesn't, it's not your problem since it's neither your tax dollars at work neither your country. Not trying to be antagonistic here, just putting it out there for discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  5. this burns me up because i see the Royal Marines training at 29 Palms and Bridgeport with US Marines...i see UK Harriers operating off our ships and ours off theirs...

    i see the Royal Air Force flying at Red Flag....

    i see BAE USA producing more and more of our equipment...

    i see the UK as a tier one partner in the F-35....

    and finally i see the UK government lobbying like crazy only a few months ago for an agreement that would allow them greater access to our technology and then they pull this.

    if it works out good...but adjustments should be made.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think this is a natural reflection of budget realities. That is; closer cooporation on certain issues that do not challenge sovereignty. It's going in the same direction here in the Nordic countries, in particular on procurement and development. There is even an informal, yet highly credible, manifest on closer defence and security alliances between all five Nordic countries. It goes even so far as to suggest a future break down of traditional defence roles, assigning a major role to each country, so to speak. Norway would be the natural maritime nation. It's all theory and far into the future, but unless some great unifying crises comes upon Europe and the US, defence budgets will likely stay put or shrink further perhaps necessitating a new course of action. Note that I'm not implying that NATO's role will diminish. Rather quite the opposite.

    B. Bolsøy
    Oslo

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.