Second Line of Defense writes....
Lessons Learned From Operation El Dorado CanyonRead the whole thing and consider it carefully. Quite a bit of truth lies in this short article.
During Operation El Dorado Canyon in Libya in the late 1980s, the United States conducted a strike against the Libyan government in response to the state-sponsored bombing of a disco in Berlin that resulted in the injury of over 200 people, and cost the lives of two individuals. Much of the accolades that followed the successful raids on Libya revolved around the long-range, EF-111 and FB-111 bombers, along with the KC-135 and KC-10 aircraft that conducted long-range refueling operations while originating operations out of the United Kingdom.
Less talked about was the role of the Naval Forces off the coast of Libya that also participated in the raids. Well over 30 Naval strike aircraft participated in the raids as well, and the Naval Force was also on stand-by to conduct search and rescue operations as needed with helo-borne forces. The Naval Fleet provided command and Control as well, and the security of the airspace was guaranteed through the use of carrier-based F-14 Tomcats that were in position to react should something arise.
What is more important is what did not take place. Had there been an unforeseen emergent air threat that resulted in significant delays, the bomber force that had transited the Atlantic would have been unable adjust to the extended operations, and would likely have had to turn back toward England without dropping their ordnance. In an equivalent scenario in today’s day and age, that would most certainly be viewed as a strategic failure and then subsequently be plastered all over the mass media as exactly that.What is more important is what did not take place. Had there been an unforeseen emergent air threat that resulted in significant delays, the bomber force that had transited the Atlantic would have been unable adjust to the extended operations, and would likely have had to turn back toward England without dropping their ordnance.What the Naval Services provided operational commanders during Operation El Dorado Canyon is exactly the same thing the ARG provides today– the ability to react to change and absorb operational friction across a spectrum of operational conditions. That is something that typically doesn’t make the history books. Instead of a single-focus, long-range strike capability, the USN-USMC team provides operational commanders with a series of strategic, operational and tactical options that a one-dimensional bomber force cannot provide.
Odd that the author used Op El Dorado Canyon as an example how amphibious forces create strategic options. That Operation was all USN and USAF right? No amphibious forces were involved in a meaningful way.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the author's point. It was just a bad example, IMHO.
The ARG is very flexible and can be forward deployed for months. But let's not go crazy here, it's only a battalion (+) with six fighters and significant rotary assets.
wait lets not be so quick with the assessment of what an ARG can bring to the table.
ReplyDeletei've seen photos of LPD-17 class LPD's with over 9 helos on its deck and i'm not talking just AH-1's and UH-1's...i'm talking about 53's, 46's and MV-22's...
the big decks can be configured for sea control missions that would triple the number of jets on its decks...if not even more...
so don't get stuck with the 'notional' MEU organizational charts...its tailorable to the mission requirements.
I mostly agree Sol. The ARG brings a lot of flexibility.
ReplyDeleteHowever switching organizations take time. If you go to sea with a more traditional MEU, you can't just swap that for a sea control config overnight.