I couldn't agree more.
But what's stunning about this revelation is that Think Defence is generally a huge supporter of placing all the UK's aviation assets in the RAF basket. If he's turning on you then you've got issues.
More relevant and I think an even more stunning article is found at Sharkey's World Blog. Here's a sample.
The Typhoon had to fly in company with a Tornado because the £160 million worth of laser targeting pods destined for fitting to the Typhoon were still in their packing crates and the Typhoon pilots were not qualified or trained to use them. The Tornado was therefore used to acquire the targets for the bombs and the Typhoon pilot dropped his bombs when directed to by the Tornado crew. This can be viewed either as an innovative and sensible way of ‘making good’ serious national front line deficiencies or as a very expensive and inefficient way of doing so. The latter view seems more appropriate when Harriers from carriers remain available with trained aircrew to do a job which presently requires a Typhoon /Tornado combination which, even if either aircraft performed to desired specification, would be at a markedly higher cost.and then this...
Long story short.8. The basic costs of this mission can be broken down as follows:
Typhoon: three hours flying time £240,000Tornado: three hours flying time £105,000Refuelling tanker: five hours flying time £150,000Fuel costs: approximately £100,000Total cost of the single mission £595,000
8. Harrier aircraft from a carrier could have completed this mission for less than £80,000 and without this cost of deploying Typhoon, Tornado and tanking aircraft and associated ground support to Italy and Cyprus.
9. Those are the basic mission costs. The support costs are more difficult to estimate but suffice it to say that running RAF Marham for one year is more than four times the cost of running HMS Ark Royal or HMS Illustrious for the same period.
My friend in the UK is able to put facts and figures to thoughts that many of us have. The retirement of the Harriers was short sighted and not well thought out.
Inter service politics has cost the UK capability and the inability to admit the mistake will see that this capability is not restored.
Read the whole thing. Sharkey is taking flak...that means he's on target.
Nothing but a marketing campaign. The Tornado could have done this mission by itself. It was dropping self-designated Paveway II weapons in 1991 and Storm Shadow cruise missiles in 2003...
ReplyDeleteNow the Typhoon is 'combat proven' to help it out in it's various campaigns around the world (sales that is...) just wait to see how long it is, before the Gripen gets "combat proven" too...
At the very least we can hope the fact that a Tornado was also needed will spur the UK into actually paying to get the Typhoon up to its potential in A2G operations. With so few aircraft planned for the future we can't afford to have single role fast jets any more.
ReplyDeleteThe sad failure of the welfare state. This is where we're headed if we're not careful.
ReplyDeleteyou know whats sad? that the UK prime minister stated that the way they designed there welfare state, it allowed British citizens to not work and yet still live comfortably.
ReplyDeletethey're moving away from a flawed system and we're moving toward it.