P-791
The hybrid airship demonstrator was given the
identifier P-791. The company-funded demonstrator, which is 123 feet
long, fifty-three feet wide, and thirty feet high, was built in 2005.
First flight came on 31 January 2006. All of the major components —
cockpit, engines, fuel lines, control surfaces, ACLS pads — are attached
on the outside of the envelope. The envelope is woven Vectran, a
lightweight, high-strength material similar to Kevlar. The engines and
propellers are mounted on aluminum rings that allow vectoring up and
down and left and right for climbing, descending, and steering. The
forward engine mounts are lashed to the envelope, while the two aft
engines are attached with a composite, wishbone-shaped assembly that
fits along the contours of the envelope. The engine/propeller/mount
combinations, called thrusters, give P-791 a top speed of about thirty
knots.
|
Lot of potential here.
ReplyDeleteHow about supporting a group of light tactical aircraft or UCAVs? like the old USS Akron.
Or acting as a mobile fire base (like the AC-130 with insane loiter).
remember when LSTs were Large Slow Targets?
ReplyDeleteComparisons of this to airlifters only show how little such an aircraft can hold.
Analysis showing how such aerial vehicles could transport materials to AFG would be interesting (thus getting the US around or over Pakistan our not so good ally?
The secret draw of the airship is the sheer space of the cargo hold, particularly for rigid airships. This nonrigid airship, the skytug, has a huge hold, relative to other aircraft, but even it is limited in size due to air resistance. In rigids, the hold's size is limited only by the external dimensions of the airship- imagine a warehouse-like space over 300 feet long and 90 feet wide, in an airship only 450 feet long.
DeleteThis is a much larger problem than you might imagine. Even the largest cargo planes- such as the 100-ton payload 747 freighter, or the 135-ton payload C-7 Galaxy- oftentimes are limited to carrying much smaller weights, because their fuselages are not capacious enough for cargo that wasn't extremely dense. Hence, silly aircraft like the Super Guppy and Beluga.
Couple its ability to carry the full potential of its payload every single time, with the immense payloads of 50, 200, 500, 1,000 tons, depending on its size, and you have something truly impressive. The largest plane ever built, the tragically impractical Antonov An-225, can only carry 250 tons, and it's expensive, dependent on large airports, uses frightening amounts of fuel, and so on. Airships aren't just cheap to buy, they're quite affordable to operate, with low fuel and maintennance costs, and no pesky airports to build and maintain. The only drawback is the lower speed, but when you can carry as much in one trip as the largest airplane can in 4, having 1/4 the speed becomes less of a problem.
yeah but a small fleet could move a Stryker Brigade or even an Airborne Division to an area rather quickly...especially in a developing situation.
ReplyDeletemore importantly though is the fact that they can be used to augment strategic airlift. we might have 200 plus C-17's but its not enough and this can lift far more.
They may not be able to carry much compared to a naval transport but its vulnerable to a lot less. SAMs and Enemy fighters are fairly easy to locate and destroy, while submarines and minefields are not.
ReplyDeleteIt would be interesting to use these to offload a MSC ship far off shore or even in another region (say docked in Greece while the fighting is in Iran), to keep the logistical ships out of range of enemy airstrikes or submarine threat areas.
Sol you can count on one hand the number of time AMC lifters have done a unit move into forward area.
ReplyDeleteTLAM an interesting concept but remember that MSC sealift ships carry cargo on the order of 10s of thousands of pounds to be discharged, so it will take many of event the largest aerial lifters to move much. In addition, much of what is on the MPS for insance is tactical equipment meaning the many sometimes large and over sized vehicles which won't fit in the above a/c.
I like the really like the concept of strategic airlifting into a LZ without the need for a big airstrip. Questions are how much, now long, how many.
BUT do not forget the "Tyranny of Tonnage". MPSrons have over 100,000 tons of cargo on them.