Correction: I stated that SOCOM was looking for an ITV/GAARV and GCV vehicles. I should have stated Ground Mobility Vehicle instead of GCV! My mistake.
Its time to update the list of possible contenders for the SOCOM ITV/GAARV programs. These are two separate programs of record but I still believe that the GAARV will be rolled into the ITV program. As it now stands the GAARV is looking at an air droppable, sling loadable or internally carried vehicle with a 3 foot ground clearance for use in flood zones/hurricane relief missions and for clearing rubble in a humanitarian assistance mission.
It doesn't require that the vehicle be carried internally inside the V-22 and it highlights the clearance requirement. From the outside looking in, it appears that the days of SOCOM getting practically everything it wants is over and pressure (I believe) will be placed on Air Force Special Ops to get in line with the trigger pullers in the other parts of the building. That means programs will merge. So the contenders.
If I missed a vehicle in this comp hit me up. But I'm becoming more convinced than ever that the SOCOM Internally Transportable Vehicle, Ground Combat Vehicle and Para-rescue programs will be collapsed into at best two programs.
I could be wrong and maybe all three will be funded.
We'll see.
For your review. The updated RFI for the GAARV. Fascinating reading.
Its time to update the list of possible contenders for the SOCOM ITV/GAARV programs. These are two separate programs of record but I still believe that the GAARV will be rolled into the ITV program. As it now stands the GAARV is looking at an air droppable, sling loadable or internally carried vehicle with a 3 foot ground clearance for use in flood zones/hurricane relief missions and for clearing rubble in a humanitarian assistance mission.
It doesn't require that the vehicle be carried internally inside the V-22 and it highlights the clearance requirement. From the outside looking in, it appears that the days of SOCOM getting practically everything it wants is over and pressure (I believe) will be placed on Air Force Special Ops to get in line with the trigger pullers in the other parts of the building. That means programs will merge. So the contenders.
Another work around that the Para-rescue guys came up with. Transporting casualties on a trailer is practically unheard of but will be accepted if this vehicle comes into service. |
If I missed a vehicle in this comp hit me up. But I'm becoming more convinced than ever that the SOCOM Internally Transportable Vehicle, Ground Combat Vehicle and Para-rescue programs will be collapsed into at best two programs.
I could be wrong and maybe all three will be funded.
We'll see.
For your review. The updated RFI for the GAARV. Fascinating reading.
IIRC the Growler actually lost to an interesting proposal from Rae-Beck and then the procurement process was gamed to ensure to the Growler would be selected. Rae-Beck still has information about their proposal up on their site here: raebeckauto.com
ReplyDeleteThe chief reason given for the Growler selection was that it was a non-developmental vehicle, a claim that a subsequent investigation (as well as the huge cost increases and development delays) proved to be blatantly false.
The SADF's selection for their paratroopers, beefing up an existing 8x8 ATV at a fraction of the cost and deploying it in no time, is a great contrast with "one money pit isn't enough" approach in the US. Info on their Gecko vehicle here: http://www.lmt.co.za/product_gecko.htm
IIRC correctly it just misses fitting into an Osprey as is but a similar approach with a different existing 6x6 or 8x8 would probably fit.
You're saying GCV, i think you mean GMV 1.1
ReplyDelete