Sunday, September 30, 2012

They're not worth it.

Check out the latest from AP.

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) -- A firefight broke out between U.S. forces and their Afghan army allies in eastern Afghanistan Sunday, killing two Americans and three Afghan soldiers and pushing the number of U.S. troops killed in the long-running war 2,000.
The fighting started Saturday when what is believed to have been a mortar fired by insurgents struck a checkpoint set up by U.S. forces in Wardak province, said Shahidullah Shahid, a provincial government spokesman. He said the Americans thought they were under attack from a nearby Afghan army checkpoint and fired on it, prompting the Afghan soldiers to return fire.
The Afghan Defense Ministry said the gunbattle was the result of a "misunderstanding" between international forces and Afghan soldiers manning a checkpoint in the Sayd Abad district.
NATO's International Security Assistance Force, commonly referred to as ISAF, provided a different account.
"After a short conversation took place between (Afghan army) and ISAF personnel firing occurred which resulted in the fatal wounding of an ISAF soldier and the death of his civilian colleague," the coalition said in a statement. It said the three Afghan soldiers died "in an ensuing exchange of fire."
NATO did not say whether it considered this an "insider" attack on foreign forces by Afghan allies.
There has been rising tide of such attacks in which Afghan soldiers or police assault their international allies. The killings pose one of the greatest threats to NATO's mission in the country, endangering a partnership key to training up Afghan security forces and withdrawing international troops.
While it may be days before it becomes clear who fired on whom first, the incident illustrates how tense relations have become between international troops and their Afghan allies.
Officials on both sides went into damage control mode, arguing that Saturday's violence did not mark a new low in Afghan-U.S. relations and urging patience while investigators tried to figure out exactly what had happened.
The deputy commander of NATO's military force in Afghanistan, British Lt. Gen. Adrian Bradshaw, called a last-minute news conference in Kabul to address the incident, even though he had few details to give.
He said the initial report of an insider attack should be amended to note that the incident "is now understood possibly to have involved insurgent fire," and tried to stress that relations between international troops and their Afghan allies "are very strong and very effective."
A spokesman for the Afghan Defense Ministry, Gen. Zahir Azimi, also sought to downplay the incident.
"In a misunderstanding shooting broke out between Afghan army and ISAF forces. As a result of the shooting, three army soldiers were killed, three other soldiers were wounded and number of ISAF forces were killed and wounded," Azimi said in a statement.
These bastards aren't worth it.

Nuff said.

6 comments :

  1. Not quite sure I can agree with you here on fault.

    It sounds like the Americans were fired upon, assumed it was the nearby ANA, and shot back.
    The ANA then returned fire.

    If the ANA are in fact, innocent of starting the shooting, well, thats really really worrying.

    Because it points to relationship that has broken down far more than anyone has so far suggested.

    The next step would be preemptively attacking the ANA....


    The ANA could of course have started the shooting, but who knows?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Today in history: Solomon says American soldiers are bastards.

    You've just made my day, buddy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. are you really that fucking stupid and ask your mom why she didn't consider abortion.

      Delete
    2. I could ask you the same question, bro.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  3. the top NATO gen is talking getting out sooner than 2014

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.