Saturday, October 27, 2012

Modest Proposal. Test the LHD in the Sea Control Ship Concept.

Sea Control Ship.

V/STOL Support Ship.
via SLD Info.com
As the Enterprise (CVN-65) transits the Mediterranean Sea for the last time on its way home to Virginia for retirement and inactivation, the Navy is bracing for a new reality — starting Dec. 1, it will have only 10 aircraft carriers.
The key to maintaining an effective and responsive Navy is being able to both project power through regularly scheduled rotations and add surge forces when needed, Navy spokesman Lt. Cdr. John Fage told Inside the Navy on Oct. 16. But with just 10 ships in the fleet until the Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) delivers in 2015, Program Executive Officer for Aircraft Carriers Rear Adm. Thomas Moore told ITN in an August interview that surging becomes much more complicated and risks long-term damage to the fleet.
“The demand signal is not likely to go down any time soon, and so we’r working pretty hard within in the maintenance community, and [Vice] Adm [Kevin] McCoy and his whole team at [Naval Sea Systems Command] and the shipyards, are looking real hard at what we can do to make sure we hand these ships back over to the combatant commanders and the operators ready to go,” Moore said. “And so we’ve been very successful with that, but we’ve been very honest with them about what we can and can’t do. And to be honest with you, more of it at this point is, the combatant commanders say ‘I want X number of carriers’ and we say ‘I can give you Y.’”
The Navy is about to be down to 10 aircraft carriers.

Bad times in the land of the big blue machine, but a solution is already here...IF the Navy and Marines are bold enough to see where it leads.

Its time to man and deploy an LHD as a Sea Control Ship (more properly called a V/STOL Support Ship).  Strip an LHD of its embarked Battalion Landing Team, add a Reinforced Harrier Squadron from the USMC and maybe add a rotary anti-sub helo detachment with a couple more multi-role MH-60s and get them to sea.

It would provide a smaller punch than a full sized carrier battle group BUT it could maintain big carrier rotations AND it would be good enough for MOST scenarios.

Besides, it can't hurt to try...the worst that could happen is that the Sea Control Concept would be confirmed as a success or failure.

NOTE:  This concept dates back to the 70's...and yes every LHD/LHA has the sea control mission as part of its operating concepts, but it has never been realistically deployed as one.  That's what I'm calling for especially since the Navy will be down to 10 carriers.

9 comments :

  1. Welcome to the LHA-6. It's secondary mission is exactly this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. every LHD in service today has this as a secondary mission.

      Delete
    2. They weren't specifically built for it like the LHA-6s though.

      Delete
  2. In fact go check out the Convair 200 over on Secret Projects. It had both STOVL and CV variants and would have been faster than the F-35. In the 70s.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. already covered. lots of planes on paper looked good but could never be made to work. the Convair 200 never came close to matching the F-35's even in test mode much less operationally. oh and i 've already covered that plane.

      Delete
    2. I'm sorry, did I say it was a match for the F-35? As for "could never be made to work" it never got the chance as the Rockwell XFV-12 was chosen instead. Oh, and since you've already covered the small carriers issue(numerous times) and got the same answer each time one can't help but wonder what the point of your little exercise is. But hey, whatever. Keep asking the same fucking questions over and over again and then insulting the people trying to help you. Eventually you'll be left with your own misguided opinions for friends.

      Delete
  3. Remember that there is always one carrier undergoing extensive nuclear refueling and overhaul and, thus, not available for deployment no matter what the circumstances. The carrier force when Enterprise is done will be 9 available carriers and 1 unavailable (9+1).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sol, do you think that all this extra air-power capacity is worth the diminished amphibious resources available?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. its not worth it and the USMC and USN both agree. the well deck is coming back. USS America and the next ship are both going to be "unique" the days of the old 1970's USS Iwo Jima type LHA are dead as disco.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.