Friday, January 04, 2013

Airbus A330 wins in India.

via Aviation News.
India has selected the  European Airbus 330-200 MRTT over the  Russian Ilyushin-78 mid-air refuelling  aircraft in an Rs 8,500-crore contract.
Defence ministry sources on Thursday said the European Aeronautics Defence and Space Company (EADS) “is now being called for the final commercial negotiations” for acquisition of six Airbus-330 MRTT tankers.
So the Airbus offering racked up another win.

On a personal note I keep wondering if it wouldn't have been the better tanker for the USAF but they bungled the selection on more than a couple of levels.

*They made it a replacement for the KC-135 instead of a best value tanker contract.
*The Air Force didn't do market research to see what airplanes were available to fulfill its needs and got stuck picking between two different size airplanes--it was a no win situation from the beginning.
*Airbus treated the US like a colony..and this is a warning to other manufacturers...having simple assembly plants in the US for our defense products isn't good enough.  They need to be manufactured here in order to pass the smell test.

The good thing about the airplane though is that its one big beast and should take up some slack when it comes to transporting cargo and deploying air assets long distances.  But the bad is that the A400 will probably eat into  its sales.  If the turn to the Pacific is real and if we don't come up with a fancy two seat, stretched F-22 then we might miss having a tanker larger than the KC-10 to help us rampage over the area.

3 comments :

  1. The A330 was way too big for the KC-X roll. Now down the road the KC-Y program to replace the KC-10s might be more to it's liking. Then again it'll be competing against the 777 most likely for that one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sol,

    First, happy new year. Best wishes.

    Second, do I understand you correctly? Is there a push in the US for modern 2-seat fighters? I'm not convinced some of the things those new critters are supposed to be able to do will be easily handled by the pilot, even with new tech.

    Take care.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Just be glad if the USAF and the DoD dont screw this up...
    And we can forget about the FB-22 or FB_23...no money for that.
    But the USAF could go with the 3rd option proposed for the regional bomber:the B-1R- F-119 engines,AESA radar,air-to-air missiles...the USAF could even put Harpoon ASMs on it...that would make the Chinese sh#t their pants :).It could be an american TU-22 on steroids.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.