In order to fully appreciate the tremendous leap ahead in capabilities that the F-35 will bring its essential to understand the origins of the program.
Two websites give the best overview.
JSF.mil and
Aerospace Website.
On JSF, its recommended that you take a few minutes and read the ENTIRE history of the program...including pre-JAST info. On Aerospace, I suggest you look at all galleries and examine the different concepts that were proposed for each program. I can't imagine the frustration for designers to work on designs only to see them scrapped and a new program started.
One thing can't be denied. Work has been going on since the 1990's to replace the F-16, F-18, A-10 and Harrier.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEil0CeWQkggVwFayoHPCkA9QIVadDlwayNfh3XcF8nNujagBvjtoN-pixF_x8ay1tN5nF42ZN6euvlnEcHSZCDCMc8JCU-H4r_FZ_PAra2kIt9TJ1rTCuhyphenhyphenpvbbvvwJHoTW_ATWXlO51eI/s640/astovl_bae_lockheed_01.jpg) |
Advanced Short Take-Off/Vertical Landing (ASTOVL) 1983-1994 |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgOvToUxG9pxenheyXK2yoPwVz4sH5mR7xn-ZaxKFdEZHQUUOU4TLBA2qtU5bQWgVFaLx1CoWsq3X6lAI65dcnKlpI6qiOwrJccvLnM8U5WYlIQ0LaDdZnAyVbKQjqn9TYS8iAZhUQz72s/s640/1307771245_a_12_avenger_ii_by_japphell-d3ci05u.png) |
Advanced Tactical Aircraft (ATA) 1983-1991 |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRls3JkOUd6JgbJ4ba2xcvkXUeZ-dJVXD3jtwKIGvfB8fkWOZj8OoI5wLNbjFTVCcu3qHKCVKjLbBAuBDEgkvyfEEfWp2bBlyXFvp7Vub0n_tp7W5wq1VDseFDuSiOQ7njRoqRikwZACc/s640/jast_mdd_ng_bae_03.jpg) |
Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) 1994-1996 |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcTHXzPmfzLuWjf3KWVWabFAqKs0v55K1BonmJw3cGCiiKSjyVRebR3Jbbldgw-Xzn2SM1rTTVglZnf4hlAUhcV3BD5uVfKfm97C3oEJlrrcZKRGfoRQ906X6JqOLJ6s6saux3IzoUoXM/s640/jast_northrop_02.jpg) |
Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) 1994-1996 |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhj_5DgULxyvgbxKVaU0fkKxVwrD5m9R0AfHgBanvcYbFiORnSb6fqxkXRBt7Li-AC2vAVmkhqHCgPOZCtAyxwtafZMb10KtHsEWzzH5SguUQ5diOsHn_2VMOOo9lt1OJkeaU3YvHLQ6rs/s640/afx_lockheed_boeing_gd_02.jpg) |
Advanced/Fighter-Attack (A/F-X) 1992-1993 |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicWrhappf_qsmON-bJLGQHOBEqPniFqlrINgW2hRgGP-gl7nBJsZAUSCBXWXa7MmhyphenhyphenaYPqOvqs2dOPRcmxn2i3iHXy4gyoh-S9UctC2V9Sjg5YXpdLehVnfgYblZcUOs4ofoYtS_yHN4E/s640/mrf_mdd_01.jpg) |
Multi-Role Fighter (MRF) 1990-1993 |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgEbwrfGnJa0zaQx2K20mFkjYVNkij5Sgeu1dNcHWR9JTkyVBAs4CE-UEsbM-Hf7Ph21JKcwzIvK3DlyOoO3jRfPDxqA1Mhdc9w4m0kJ5KsFi_RF-QqcAEKYaZkHp69Im4IHTrzSjCVQnQ/s640/mrf_boeing_01.jpg) |
Multi-Role Fighter (MRF) 1990-1993 |
Sol, i like the 35 for all the replacements, except the A10. the unique nature of the A10, its ability to loiter, its a tough SOB, and its massive ordinance, can the 35 really match it in close ground support? why not do to it like the 18s, a super A10, i am sure the skin of the aircraft can be improved with newer materials, better avionics, and such. I am certain much technology from the 22 and 35 programs would go in, put ISR components on there. just brainstorming.
ReplyDeleteI covered a bit of the JSF pre history, at least from a UK perspective, in my recent F35 series
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2013/01/looking-forward-to-an-f35-future-part-2-dredging-up-the-past/