Sunday, April 21, 2013

General you have some explaining to do.


After the attack, which resulted in the deaths of two Marines and the largest loss of allied materiel in the 11-year-long Afghan war, the top U.S. commander on the base did not order a formal investigation into the security lapses or sanction any personnel responsible for guarding the facility, the officials said.

In the days following the raid, some U.S. and NATO military leaders insisted that the Taliban got lucky by choosing to breach where they did. But several officials with direct knowledge of the assault said in recent interviews that staffing decisions by U.S. and British commanders weakened the base’s defenses, making it easier for the insurgents to reconnoiter the compound and enter without resistance. Once inside, 15 insurgents used grenades to destroy almost an entire squadron of Marine AV-8B Harrier jets, a loss estimated by military officials at about $200 million.
and this too...
A senior U.S. officer with direct knowledge of security on the bases said it was common for Bastion’s watchtowers to be unmanned. 
and this....
In December 2011, 325 Marines were assigned to patrol the area, according to the senior U.S. officer with knowledge of security measures. In the month before the attack, however, the number was cut back to about 100, the officer said.
“We reduced the force to patrol [the area around the base] to the point where it was an unacceptable risk,” the officer said.
The top U.S. commander at Leatherneck at the time, Marine Maj. Gen. Charles Gurganus, who approved of the reduction, said force levels for perimeter patrols were based on U.S. and NATO assessments of possible threats. At the time, other military officials said, Marine intelligence analysts did not issue any specific warnings of a frontal assault by the Taliban.

“You can’t defend everywhere every day,” Gurganus said in response to a question about the attack. “You base your security on the threat you’ve got.” He said the Taliban caught “a lucky break.”
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE SHITTING ME.  Poor leadership.  Failure to accept responsibility.  Disgraceful.  And please spare me the enemy gets a vote bullshit...if you're in a fixed position and you have Marine attached to your name then you fucking make sure you have security out.

I don't give a fuck if you have stars on your collar or not.

Sidenote;  The chest thumping by the RAF Regiment becomes even more unseemly now.  Not blaming them, this is a leadership failure, but their behavior after the attack was most disgraceful.  

2 comments :

  1. That line from Col. Yingling, "As matters stand now, a private who loses a rifle suffers far greater consequences than a general who loses a war." popped into my mind after this.

    Another reason why everyone with a star on their shoulder should be retired and the entire establishment cleansed: too much Good Ol' Boy network watching out for their own. That so-called leader should be relieved of his command and issued his walking papers.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is not the first time Marines took it on the chin for orders from a Higher authority. Beirut barracks bombing, the gate guard was one man and he had an M-16A1 with at most five rds of ammo, and an order to not shoot anybody.
    I just hope the Marines were not at some modern version of Fire Base Mary Anne circa Second Indochina war.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.