She needs to work on her flexibility to be truly impressive, but I'm sure her Squadron mates were satisfied with the performance.
I've said it once and I'll say it again. Its not the Males, its the Females. In the military, Females are (at least sexually if not operationally) a low density, high value item that men compete for. Add to it plain Janes that were once ignored and now are the center of attention, is it no wonder that the reality is far different than the picture that's being painted?
Note: As far as the title of this ditty is concerned don't blame me. The US Air Force should have developed a gender neutral name for its service people. We have Marines, Soldiers, Sailors and technically Airmen...but I'm a traditionalist. Why would I call a female a male? If males are identified as Airmen, then its reasonable to call females serving Airwomen.
