Thanks for the link Nico!
via Yahoo Finance.
Operational Test and Evaluation is suppose to be the final guardian of equipment used by US personnel. The idea that they would cave into political and economic pressure to get a plane into service before its been thoroughly tested is depressing. I've feared that the entire Pentagon has gone belly up and this proves it.
There is no one left to look after the interests of the troops.
A pilot will possibly die because this plane is being rushed into service with untold number of undiscovered issues because we're doing production AND testing at the same time. When problems are discovered later on, the entire Western fleet of aircraft will be grounded and costly upgrades applied because Lockheed Martin and the Pentagon are so desperate to get it into service NOW!
We are becoming more vulnerable than ever and all the proponents of this plane can yell is "stay the course" instead of lifting their heads up and realizing exactly how fucked up this program really is.
via Yahoo Finance.
Kyra Hawn, spokeswoman for the $392 billion F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, said discussions were under way with the Pentagon's "testing community" but no decisions had been made.Read the entire article.
"It's trying to do what makes sense and is efficient, without up-ending the intent of having these separate and distinct review processes," Hawn said.
Pentagon officials have said they hope to protect the F-35, the military's most expensive new weapons program, but mounting budget pressures have forced officials to look for efficiencies and cost savings across the board.
Michael Gilmore, the Pentagon's director of operational testing and evaluation, has been critical of past efforts to reduce F-35 developmental testing, arguing that it could lead to significant discoveries during operational testing later.
Gilmore had also warned against starting pilot training before more developmental testing had been completed, but the services decided to press ahead with training programs.
But Gilmore's spokeswoman Jenn Elzea said he would consider a more integrated testing approach, if structured properly.
"The Director of Operational Test & Evaluation is always open to considering the use of integrated testing, which uses developmental tests conducted under appropriate conditions to collect data for use in our operational evaluations," she said.
Traditionally, U.S. weapons programs have gone through developmental testing to flesh out any design flaws and then rigorous operational tests before the weapons are fielded.
But the F-35 program was designed to move into production while developmental testing was still in progress, an approach called "concurrency" that Frank Kendall, now the Pentagon's chief arms buyer, has described as "acquisition malpractice."
Operational Test and Evaluation is suppose to be the final guardian of equipment used by US personnel. The idea that they would cave into political and economic pressure to get a plane into service before its been thoroughly tested is depressing. I've feared that the entire Pentagon has gone belly up and this proves it.
There is no one left to look after the interests of the troops.
A pilot will possibly die because this plane is being rushed into service with untold number of undiscovered issues because we're doing production AND testing at the same time. When problems are discovered later on, the entire Western fleet of aircraft will be grounded and costly upgrades applied because Lockheed Martin and the Pentagon are so desperate to get it into service NOW!
We are becoming more vulnerable than ever and all the proponents of this plane can yell is "stay the course" instead of lifting their heads up and realizing exactly how fucked up this program really is.
The JSF Program Office and its leader, General Bogdan, who initially put on a front as being independent, is now totally in bed with the JSF contractor and what Bogdan wants to do now -- pull testing from the services -- is illegal.
ReplyDeleteDr. J. Michael Gilmore was sworn in as Director of Operational Test and Evaluation on September 23, 2009. A Presidential appointee confirmed by the United States Senate, he serves as the senior advisor to the Secretary of Defense on operational and live fire test and evaluation of Department of Defense weapon systems. Dr. Gilmore operates under 10 USC § 2399 - Operational test and evaluation of defense acquisition programs.
According to 10 USC § 2399 the Secretary of Defense,{acting through Gilmore] shall provide that a covered major defense acquisition program or a covered designated major subprogram may not proceed beyond low-rate initial production until initial operational test and evaluation of the program or subprogram is completed.
The term “operational test and evaluation” means—
(i) the field test, under realistic combat conditions, of any item of (or key component of) weapons, equipment, or munitions for the purpose of determining the effectiveness and suitability of the weapons, equipment, or munitions for use in combat by typical military users; and
(ii) the evaluation of the results of such test.
That's *** under realistic combat conditions ***
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/2399
That's not this:
General Bogdan said it he is "examining the possibility of saving time and money" by more closely integrating developmental and operational testing of the new F-35 jet built by Lockheed Martin Corp. Kyra Hawn, spokeswoman for the $392 billion F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, said discussions were under way with the Pentagon's "testing community" but no decisions had been made.
Thanksgiving is coming up -- time to ill this turkey.
It is going to be real interesting to see what the consolidated testing looks like and what has already been achieved, I think it is going to be quite revealing. I wouldn't be surprised that we will get computer simulations as real validated tests points to save time and money and further reduction in KPPs.
ReplyDeleteHas that not been the problem though?
DeleteThe whole point of "concurrency" was that so much of the JSF's design would be perfected in computer testing that actual flight testing would only reveal minor problems with easy fixes.
How's that working out?
How's that working out? Not well. Many problems.
Deletesee Dr. Gilmore's testimony from last June. (pdf)
http://tinyurl.com/k2cjj4c
10 USC § 2399
ReplyDelete(h) Operational Test and Evaluation Defined.— In this section, the term “operational test and evaluation” has the meaning given that term in section 139 (a)(2)(A) of this title. For purposes of subsection (a), that term does not include an operational assessment based exclusively on—
(1) computer modeling;
(2) simulation; or
(3) an analysis of system requirements, engineering proposals, design specifications, or any other information contained in program documents.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/2399
Dr. Gilmore, the best man in the pentagon in my opinion, is only and advisor not a decision maker. If he tells congress the plane did not do well in OT and congress wants to fund it and the service chiefs want to buy it there is nothing he can do. He simply writes a report documenting all of his finding, may or may not write a recommendation and publishes it. Even a strongly worded recommendation is not allowed by him.
ReplyDeleteThe decision to buy rests soley in the hands of the service chiefs with an up or down vote provided by congress.
On most acquisition decisions the service chiefs prevail, but I have a feeling that the JSF is bigger than any service chief. It's joint, for one thing, and Greenert and Amos know that if they go thumbs down on the F-35 they will never be able to sit in the same room with Welsh.
DeleteGreenert: “Speaking for the Navy I need the fifth-generation fighter, and that [F-35] provides it, so we’re all in — but it has to perform. It has problems; it is making progress. I do not at this point believe that it is time to look for an exit ramp, if you will, for the Navy for the F-35C. . . I as a service chief would like to have more authority and more accountability in acquisitions.”
By the way, Greenert just got stepped on and had to cancel the pre-solicitation for F/A-18's. What a slam! Meanwhile Bogdan is in bed with LM and Dr. Gilmore has been told to put a sock in it, apparently.
The establishment considers that the JSF like Wall Street is to big to fail. (But that doesn't stop us.)
The F-35 Brewster Buffalo.
ReplyDeleteLots of pilots are gonna die in this PoS and lots of ships, and ground forces will die because of it.
This is a democrats idea of a fighter, as was the F2A Brewster.