via Defense Media Network.
Ahead of the “election” held byseparatists in Eastern Ukraine on Sunday, Russia increased military air activity in European airspace, reflective of a 300 percent increase over 2013 in intercepts of Russian aircraft.Hmm.
NATO detected four separate groups of aircraft exercising over the Baltics, the North Sea, and the Atlantic Ocean Oct. 28 and 29, according to a NATO report.
“Clearly, they pose the potential risk of escalation. They also, quite frankly, could pose just a potential risk to civil aviation just in the sheer number of and size of and scope of these flights. So, they’re not exactly helpful.”
On Oct. 28, NATO tracked seven Russian combat aircraft flying in international airspace over the Baltic Sea. The aircraft were detected at approximately 2:30 p.m. and included two MiG-31 Foxhound, two Su-34 Fullback, one Su-27 Flanker and two Su-24 Fencer fighter and strike aircraft, according to the report from SHAPE Public Affairs.
The Russian aircraft, flying over the Gulf of Finland, were intercepted by German Typhoon fighters from NATO’s Baltic Air Policing Mission. The Russian aircraft continued into the Baltic Sea and were subsequently intercepted and then handed off by Allied fighters from Denmark, Finland, and Sweden, which are not members of NATO. The Russian fighters continued to the Kaliningrad Oblast. The Russian aircraft in this incident had filed a flight plan with air traffic control authorities and were using transponders, but did not maintain radio contact with civilian air traffic control.
The Russian aircraft filed a flight plan and were using transponders. On the face of it from my chair, these flights don't appear particularly menacing. But why are the Russians doing this?
My theories?
173rd Airborne conducting an emergency readiness exercise in Romania.
Increased US military activity in Europe.
I haven't posted much on this subject but the US military has dramatically increased its activity in Europe. While our European partners (with the exception of Poland and other Eastern nations) have done little, the USMC has been seen storing armor in Scandinavian countries, the US Army sending Stryker and Heavy Armored Brigades close to Russia and even conducting emergency readiness exercises with the continents only real quick reaction force, the 173rd Airborne. I haven't even touched on naval activities with a variety of ships operating close to the Russian coast and USMC personnel training with Romanians, Estonians and Georgia.
Many theories abound on this one. Some believe that the Saudi's are attempting to push the Iranians over the edge because they depend so much on high oil prices. Some believe that Russia is responding to manipulation of oil by the Saudi's with US assistance. Others believe that the US is attempting to maintain itself as the global fiat currency. What is fact? Many African nations are dependent on high oil prices. Many Middle Eastern countries are stable ONLY because of high oil prices. Finally, Russia is also dependent. If the Russians believe that the US is helping manipulate world wide oil prices to further punish their economy then this could turn nasty.
My take?
Quite honestly I just don't know. I have seen presentations on both theories and they seem plausible. But what should concern everyone and possibly tilts this toward the oil manipulation theory is that SecDef Hagel canceled a trip to the Pacific to handle a situation in the Middle East. Rioting has been happening in Israel and a terror attack just occurred at a rail station in that country but that shouldn't rise high enough to kill his trip. ISIS is marching on but nothing earth shattering (I say this gingerly...they're monsters that need to be bombed back to the stone ages where their beliefs come from)...so what is going on behind the scenes that caused the cancellation? Unfortunately more to come I'm sure.
|
I have a bad feelings about this...
ReplyDeleteJust like they are testing the air defense in Baltic region. Simulate attack on Sweden, highly increasing entering airspace of Finland and Baltic States, they would not do this just to piss off everybody around... do they?
quote from the movie "the hunt for red october"...
ReplyDeletethe russians don't take a piss without a plan. what's their plan?
@the russians don't take a piss without a plan. what's their plan?@
DeleteSir, I guess the main idea of our activity should be about this:
- to do some kind of reduction of Western playbook on the Middle East, but in our cases – another landscape (Europe), another reaction mass (Ukrainian Nazi instead of islamists) another geopolitical focus point (East Europe in part of Ukrainian neighbors instead Central Asia). But the same principle a «manage Explosively formed penetrator» on the base of one your nation-competitor and unleash them against another your competitors.
- to realize alternative logistics routs West-Asia through Russian territory.
- to pull some global blanket in terms of geopolitical influence, new markets, finance – to Russia.
- to feed up Russians with “enemies wants to kill us and eat us” – for “help” Russians forget that they are ruled by oligarchs, thieves and liars
Also keep in mind a Republican Congress will create headaches for Putin. Right now there is a spread of about 5 bucks between west Texas crude (the United States benchmark) and Brent crude (the European benchmark). Obama has slightly opened the door to crude exports. He has allowed 3 companies so far to make small overseas sales. If the Republicans allow full exports of crude, which I think would be very smart, the spread will disappear. Oil companies here will get better prices, and overseas prices would come down further pressuring the Russians. The Republicans are also going to push Keystone XL (terrible for our good friends in Venezuela). Should be interesting.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-04/saudis-go-back-to-the-future-to-take-on-u-s-shale-rivals.html
ReplyDeleteShouldn't be surprised. NATO has no business or certainly the U.S. has no business in Russia's back yard. Example, putting USN ships in the Black Sea. Great how the insurgent U.S. State Department interferes in things not in our interest. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5n8UbJ8jsk
ReplyDeleteAhhh... the Black Sea it's shore is manly controlled by NATO members but for you it is a Russia backyard? Or even better... we speak here about Baltic Sea where even less is under Russian control. And the planes that RAF intercept near Great Britain... oh for sureeeee that's also... Russia backyard.
DeleteYou did saw map of the world do you? The Russian backyard is Siberia or Barents Sea.
NATO is in Russian opinion(and opinion of many round the world) interfeering and now already threatening Russias safety ,russians allways consider buffer zones as a necesary defense measure and EU and US sponsored coup in Ukraine and potential Nato enlargment onto its borders is simply to much for Russia not to act. In coldwar Shas you were the buffer zone for Soviet union now for Russia its Ukraine and Belorussia.
DeleteShas if Black sea is not Russian back jard by which standard does US consider all of the americas its zone of interest and more or les all of the Pacific.
Yes... many, we saw those "many" in some ONZ meetings. Those who support Russia we can count on one hand, and some real global players we had here... like North Korea. Dream one comrade.
DeleteBlack Sea is controlled by Turkey, because who control the strait, control that sea. And Turkey is NATO member, as many others on the Black Sea shore. Just like the Baltic is under control of NATO members. You can whine as many as you want but those both seas are under NATO domination and Russia can't do a shit about that.
South America is long time lost for US domination, Pacific is controlled by US and it's allies for now. You start to dominate some place... you can call it your backyard and frontyard or even sideyard if you want it. If you don't dominate it... you can frak yourself.
One thing is political support other is public opinion and this is not so single sided unless you ask somewhere in Poland or the Baltic states.
DeleteWhat's common between a pound, ruble and a dollar?
Delete- For a pound of rubles you get a dollar
@ The Russian backyard is Siberia or Barents Sea.@
DeleteRussians backyard is where Russians recognize it.
Here is a very scary idea: Putin is using the Reagan Strategy on us.
ReplyDeletePresident Reagan's strategy for the Cold War was simple: drive them bankrupt by winning the arms race. Okay, it is actually much more involved than that, but this I don't want to ramble for 3 page on somebody else's blog.
But in a nutshell, Reagan thought the Soviet Union was close to econonmic collapse trying to keep control of the Warsaw Pact , beat us in an arms race, and of course their own "Communist Utopia" where shelves went empty on regular basis. So he decided to push them over the edge by building up our military might to a 600 ship navy and equally huge and awesome Corps(Many of those amphibs we are still using were ones he had built), He upgraded our nuclear arsenal, brought back a cancelled B-1 bomber, etc. etc.
And he challenged the Soviets in semi-clandestine fights in Afganistan, Nicarauga, and others. He even invaded Grenada (I had trouble finding that one on map back in the day) just to hammer home the point.
Long Story Short: their economy went tits-up, the moderates like Gorbachev and Yeltsin got power from the hardliners and the Iron Curtain fell...And Putin was there when it happened.
Now Putin looks out and sees a USA that has been in a 10 year Recession. A USA whose government is up to its eyeballs in debt. And most importantly he sees a USA who cant afford to give new APC's to its Army and Marines, replace 40 year old amphibs, is spending a billion dollars for 10 planes (F-35) and is spending 10 million a day on token air strikes against ISIS after spending a trillion dollars in war over the last 10 years with nothing to show for it.
So suddenly the bombers are in our airspace--like the cold war, they building new nukes--like the Cold War, making excellent non-stealth planes for a 1/5 the price--a lot of them. See the pattern?
Oh, thanks for the excellent question Solomon. I made my first rant on my blog with a longer version of this. You asked in another post about my blog its http://milspecmusings.wordpress.com/
Off topic, but a cool story.
ReplyDeletehttp://theaviationist.com/2014/11/05/how-to-survive-in-a-dogfight-alone-against-six-migs-the-lesson-learned-from-richard-schaffert-dogfight/
Standing back up after a long time in their corner.
ReplyDeleteTraining, getting pilots, crews and ground crews certified for any action needed.
At a time when it doesnt look like the F35 pilots will ever get their required flying time/month the Russian Air Force is doing everyting mentioned above. Thats a thought worth pondering.
DeleteSo here's an explanation for Oil, if you go on the manipulation theory....Tesla has now developed cars that have as high performance as the cars at the same price point and are about to release a car that is approaching a range of 500 -600 km (I'm in Australia and all things being equal just as recharge facilities ect,, range is a deciding factor for me). All that is missing now is overall affordability (Given that Tesla has released all of its patents, this might not be to far away) and critical mass electric car ownership to have gas stations start installing power points. So the drop in the oil price could be an effort to slow the take up of electric vehicles (Including Trucks, Australia's largest trucking company (Toll Holdings) is trailing an all electric 8 ton truck in Brisbane)?
ReplyDelete