Talk.To.Snafu@Gmail.com -
Internal payload looks impressive compared to the F-35. Thrust vectoring could be a plus too, though only 180ยบ of movement is shown.
It is not relevant because the airframe was sized for engines of 1960s tech. A modern version would be a lot smaller.
Is smaller really better when you're talking about a bomb truck?
You know this is based on an aircraft cancelled in the 1960's?
Nothing about that says "5th" gen.No edge alignmentExternal storesExternal podsNo sawtooth edgingSingle tailIt's TVC only boosts negative-g maneuvers
..and people say an F-15 is big and expensive.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Internal payload looks impressive compared to the F-35. Thrust vectoring could be a plus too, though only 180ยบ of movement is shown.
ReplyDeleteIt is not relevant because the airframe was sized for engines of 1960s tech. A modern version would be a lot smaller.
DeleteIs smaller really better when you're talking about a bomb truck?
DeleteYou know this is based on an aircraft cancelled in the 1960's?
ReplyDeleteNothing about that says "5th" gen.
ReplyDeleteNo edge alignment
External stores
External pods
No sawtooth edging
Single tail
It's TVC only boosts negative-g maneuvers
..and people say an F-15 is big and expensive.
ReplyDelete