Sunday, April 07, 2019
The USS Wasp just deployed with 10 F-35Bs while the Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier will carry 12 in peace time deployments?
I've been trying to wrap my head around the USMC's chase to turn LHDs into light carriers. For the life of me I can't understand it.
BUT! The back of the paper tally of things seems to indicate that it's at least "doable". I used for comparison the most capable carrier in allied service (in my opinion) the Queen Elizabeth. I used Wikipedia for a quick and dirty and got this....
Let's assume that the Marine Corps/Navy is looking at surge operations. Remember that before Mattis left office one of his initiatives was to change how deployments are carried out. Shorter deployments. Multiple ships leaving at the same time (we just saw that with a couple of carriers that departed their home port in San Diego together). In other words the ability to rapidly project naval power in short notice operations while preserving the fleet for high intensity ops.
Could part of the thinking involve tailored air wings not for the MEU, but for missions? The MAGTF concept but tailored toward the Wing and the big deck amphibs?
Sea Control? An LHD with F-35Bs and a few Sea Hawks. Our "new style" HA/DR? A deck full of CH-53s and UH-1Ys. SOCOM bitch work? A deck full of MV-22s, a couple of AH-1Zs and maybe 6 F-35s.
And of course the standard Air Wing mix to provide for our MEUs.
Is it in keeping with Marine Corps doctrine? I have to admit it is. Could this plan de-nude the MEU of what we consider standard air support? Depending on the situation, yes. Does it provide for alot more flexibility to the NCA and Combatant Commanders? Yeah. Yeah it does.
Does ANYONE know what the Marine Corps is thinking with the light carrier concept and am I anywhere close to the mark here or off on a wild tangent?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments :
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.