Thursday, January 09, 2025

We need a modernized LST, not the pathetic LSM.

General characteristics As built
TypeTank landing ship
Displacement
  • 4,793 long tons (4,870 t) light
  • 8,342 long tons (8,476 t) full load
Length
  • 522 ft 4 in (159.2 m) oa
  • 562 ft (171.3 m) over derrick arms
Beam69 ft 6 in (21.2 m)
Draft17 ft 6 in (5.3 m) max
Propulsion
Speed22 knots (41 km/h; 25 mph) max
Range2,500 nmi (4,600 km; 2,900 mi) at 14 knots (26 km/h; 16 mph)
Troops431 troops or 29 tanks and other vehicles
Complement213
Sensors and
processing systems
  • 2 × Mk 63 GCFS
  • SPS-10 radar
Armament2 × twin 3"/50 caliber guns

If I hadn't said it before then let me say it now. The USMC needs a modernized LST. Not the Landing Ship Medium but a new LST.

The strange thing?  It fits the specs of the LSM (a bit bigger if I recall correctly) but it has or should have the ability to keep up with the fleet. In that regard I'm talking about the modernized LST.

One of the big sticking points with FD2030 is that its too regionalized.  I fully support that critique and the pathetic performance of the LSM adds to that concern.

A new build and modernized LST would allow global operations as part of a reinvigorated MEU.  Reinvigorated and ENHANCED MEU.

One of the juicy bits is that its capable of putting vehicles directly on the beach.  A big deal because you can fully unload from this beast in less time than it takes an LCAC to make sorties to and from a LPD.  

The biggest juiciest bit?  If the Marine Corps doesn't get tanks back we can put Army armor on these vessels and reclaim some shock to our ground component.

The Landing Ship Medium is idiocy on a stick.  A modernized LST just sings.

No comments :

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.