Thanks for the heads up on the vid Michael! As far as the vehicle is concerned....looks good. I'm going to send AM General an e-mail and see if they'll provide a little info on it.
Showing posts with label ARMOR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ARMOR. Show all posts
Friday, June 17, 2011
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Saudi's buying LAV-25A2's.
Thanks Jonathan for sending me this article.
I don't know if this is a case of the Saudi's getting nervous and wanting to make sure they have all the gear they could possibly need, the Saudi's simply spending money on gear because they have so much of it laying around or the Saudi's making a strategic decision to purchase gear to ease the pain of the oil shock that the US has been experiencing.
But the Saudi's are buying gear.
Can they even deploy all the equipment they've bought? Its been so much that they must have some just sitting in the sun.
I don't know if this is a case of the Saudi's getting nervous and wanting to make sure they have all the gear they could possibly need, the Saudi's simply spending money on gear because they have so much of it laying around or the Saudi's making a strategic decision to purchase gear to ease the pain of the oil shock that the US has been experiencing.
But the Saudi's are buying gear.
WASHINGTON --- The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress Friday of a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Saudi Arabia of a variety of light armored vehicles and associated equipment, parts, training and logistical support for an estimated cost of $350 million.I've read that the Saudi National Guard is the heavy hitters in their military. Seems like they're going to be extremely well equipped.
The Government of Saudi Arabia has requested a possible sale of 25 LAV-25 series Light Armored Vehicles, 8 LAV Assault Guns, 8 LAV Anti-Tank Vehicles, 6 LAV Mortars, 2 LAV Recovery Vehicles, 24 LAV Command and Control Vehicles, 3 LAV Personnel Carriers, 3 LAV Ammo Carriers, 1 LAV Engineer Vehicle, 2 LAV Ambulances, AN/VRC 90E and AN/VRC-92E Export Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio Systems (SINCGARS), battery chargers, spare and repair parts, publications and technical documentation, personnel training and training equipment, U.S. Government and contractor engineering and technical support services, and other related elements of logistical and program support.
The estimated cost is $350 million.
This proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by helping to improve the security of a friendly country which has been, and continues to be, an important force for political stability and economic progress in the Middle East.
The proposed sale will improve the Saudi Arabian National Guard’s(Emphasis added—Ed.) ability to effectively conduct security and counter-terrorism operations, and would serve to make a key strategic partner in regional contingency operations more capable of defeating those who would threaten regional stability and less reliant on the deployment of U.S. forces to maintain or restore stability in the Middle East.
Saudi Arabia, which already has Light Armored Vehicles in its inventory, will have no difficulty absorbing these additional vehicles into its armed forces.
The proposed sale of this service will not alter the basic military balance in the region.
The prime contractors will be ITT Aerospace/Communications in Fort Wayne, Indiana; Harris Corporation in Rochester, New York; General Dynamics Land Systems in London, Ontario, Canada; and Raytheon Corporation in Tucson, Arizona. There are no known offset agreements proposed in connection with this potential sale.
Implementation of this sale will not require the assignment of any additional U.S. Government or contractor representatives to Saudi Arabia. There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a result of this proposed sale.
This notice of a potential sale is required by law and does not mean the sale has been concluded. (ends)
Can they even deploy all the equipment they've bought? Its been so much that they must have some just sitting in the sun.
Saturday, June 11, 2011
A day without Heavy Armor. Could the MEU survive???
Just a heads up.
Later today I'm going to expand on a discussion that me and B. Smitty have been having on heavy armor and the Marine Corps.
B. Smitty is a heavy armor advocate and I'm just not so sure.
Want to know what Infantry...what USMC Infantry fears (we're talking conventional warfare...not an insurgency)? Its not tanks...modern Infantry can handle tanks...what modern infantry fears is artillery fire.
With that in mind I penned an article stating that the BAE CV90120 should be the Marines next MBT.
But barring that a few other items come to mind....if we can't get the CV90120, then how about the turret from the Stryker MGS mounted to a Marine Corps vehicle...say the MPC or even the AAV?
If that proves a non-starter then perhaps its time to make a Marine Corps Aviation, secondary mission, a primary one...anti-armor support...AH-1Z's and UH-1Y's can handle the work...if they're swamped then the AV-8B and future F-35 along with F/A-18's can mix it up here too...
And last but certainly not least, Marine artillery could help fill the gaps. But the point is this...what we need worry about is not tank on tank warfare but direct fire support for the Infantry. My contention remains that the M1 is just too heavy to provide that support in the MEU and larger units as we're currently comprised.
Give the mission (if its ever required) to an Army detachment assigned to the Marines and find a smaller lighter vehicle to get it done.
Later today I'm going to expand on a discussion that me and B. Smitty have been having on heavy armor and the Marine Corps.
B. Smitty is a heavy armor advocate and I'm just not so sure.
Want to know what Infantry...what USMC Infantry fears (we're talking conventional warfare...not an insurgency)? Its not tanks...modern Infantry can handle tanks...what modern infantry fears is artillery fire.
With that in mind I penned an article stating that the BAE CV90120 should be the Marines next MBT.
But barring that a few other items come to mind....if we can't get the CV90120, then how about the turret from the Stryker MGS mounted to a Marine Corps vehicle...say the MPC or even the AAV?
If that proves a non-starter then perhaps its time to make a Marine Corps Aviation, secondary mission, a primary one...anti-armor support...AH-1Z's and UH-1Y's can handle the work...if they're swamped then the AV-8B and future F-35 along with F/A-18's can mix it up here too...
And last but certainly not least, Marine artillery could help fill the gaps. But the point is this...what we need worry about is not tank on tank warfare but direct fire support for the Infantry. My contention remains that the M1 is just too heavy to provide that support in the MEU and larger units as we're currently comprised.
Give the mission (if its ever required) to an Army detachment assigned to the Marines and find a smaller lighter vehicle to get it done.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)