Showing posts with label Special Operations Forces. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Special Operations Forces. Show all posts

Friday, July 01, 2011

Marine Special Ops. A capability the Marine Corps can't afford and the nation doesn't need.

Via Military.com
Currently the number of MarSoc Marines stands at about 1,000 — drawing mostly from the Force Recon community but also from some high-speed infantry guys and other intel-centric MOSs. Hejlik said he sees the force growing to about 5,000, or about as many SEALs in the Navy.
and this...
The general also said he envisions the Corps establishing a separate air wing to support MarSoc missions — a controversial gap when the units were established back in 2006. But he admitted that given current budget realities, it’s going to “take some time” for the service to eek out the cash to buy planes for the Leatherneck snake-eaters.
I mean seriously.

What the fuck is the General thinking?

The idea that the Marine Corps could possibly drop down to an end strength of 150, 000 to a high of 175,000 Marines and then allocate up to 5,000 Marines for Special Operations is crazy.  If you add in aircraft like the General is talking about then you have a Marine Special Forces Expeditionary Brigade sized unit.

That's insane.

No knock on Marine Special Ops but what mission are they doing that isn't already accomplished by Navy SEALs, Army Special Forces, Army Rangers or the tier one units Delta or SEAL Team 6?

Rummy forced the Marine Corps into Special Ops.  It was mistake then and its a mistake now.  The Marine Corps can't afford the loss of talent or the disruptions this brings to the Infantry MOS.

On a side note, while the bean counters are out looking to slash the military in general, I'd love for someone to do a cost benefit analysis of Special Operations forces.  With a force of over 50,000 people in SOCOM, is it really the size that the nation wants and needs or should it be down sized.

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Totally overblown nonsense.


Christian Lowe has an article over at Military.com that is completely overblown and I know he knows it.  I cringed when I saw the headline and then when I read the article, I knew exactly what it was.

IT'S THE ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS VERSION OF FEMALE ENGAGEMENT TEAMS.  A concept that the Marine Corps has been using for many, many months now.  Here's the kicker but read the whole thing.

So far, nearly 30 of the female CST Soldiers are deployed to the war zone, working in villages and towns that the commandos have cleared.
"They're supposed to be used on secure target areas," Sacolick said. "I don't want them fighting their way to a target."
I don't want them fighting their way to a target....Sacolick was playing it straight but Lowe took it over the top with his title..."Female Special Operators Now in Combat"....Lowe is better than this.  

Just the facts bro, just the facts.




ISAF answers the OPSEC/Force Protection question.

The above photo has been circulating all over the internet after the recent attacks in Afghanistan.

In some of the photos the faces of the operators are blurred in others they're visible.

I was curious.  Were the images that weren't blurred wildcat...meaning unauthorized...or does ISAF not have any kind of prohibition on the images and its just something that a few bloggers are doing?

I wrote ISAF public affairs and got an answer.  The whole e-mail will follow but I want to break it down...

It started out very pleasantly...
Sol,
The photograph in question was taken by a member of the media at apublic location. As such ISAF has no control over how the picture waspublished. Some media outlets chose to blur the faces, others did not.That decision was made by individual editors with no input from ISAF.
Wow.  So in a nutshell we have our answer.  Its an individual decision by certain bloggers.

Now on the next part I have to admit that I was trying to be a bit clever and dropped the name of the rumored unit to see if the guy would bite and either confirm or deny it.

I can see him leaning back in his chair, grinning from ear to ear saying (cause I think he's British) "Not bloody likely you silly wanker"  and "You're barmy if you think that you can get me to slip up on classified material you silly berk"....

Anyway, I'm not up on British insults but you get the idea.  Here is the actual response.
As policy ISAF does not comment on Special Ops troops or operations.Additionally, any photos taken by the media while working with themilitary community are always checked before publication to ensureoperational security is not compromised.  
Regarding this specific photo, we have nothing further to comment.  
Regards,
Tim
TP JAMES - UK AOF-3Press Desk ChiefISAF JOINT COMMANDCOMBINED JOINT OPERATIONS CENTER
So long story short.  Operational Security/Force Protection is not violated by the posting of these heroes faces on the internet.

Until a valid reason to do so comes up then pictures like the ones above should be visible to everyone.  In the future these will be historic images of a forgotten war.  They shouldn't be saved for posterity with obliterated faces.

Just my opinion.

Sunday, June 13, 2010

Sea Phantom. Another slowly developing concept.


The Sea Phantom.  An unusual high speed transport that is being touted by its developers as the answer to the issue of back injuries of Special Operations personnel when they're being transported in high speed boats.
SEAL Insertion / Harbor Patrol: the number one long-term concern of the US Navy SEAL operative during small boat insertion operations is the accumulative effect of the constant pounding on his body. The average SEAL will complete his career one inch shorter than his enlistment height, due solely to the endless wave impact loads on his spine. Many admirable approaches have been made to mitigate shock loads to small boat combatants at the seat base, but the more logical approach would be to intercept the problem at its source: the sea-surface interaction zone. The SeaPhantom does this.
The SeaPhantom rises to cruise above average wave crests; furthermore it is a boat with a suspension system - a very serious suspension system: comprising non-corrosive fiberglass leaf springs and billet-aluminum airbags - tested to 60,000 pounds - for dampening the effects of errant wave impacts.
Servicemen assigned to patrol will be in far better shape to perform their duties when not beaten into the ground during hours of small boat operations...

As to the actual utility of this boat?  I just don't know, it is unusual looking, its a hydrofoil of sorts and it does appear to be fast.  How practical it would be when used as an insertion platform is beyond me though.