Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Migrants overrun police at border checkpoint in Hungary.

Thanks to William for the link!

via...
*MIGRANTS OVERRUN POLICE AT BORDER CROSSING TO ENTER HUNGARY:AFP
2015-09-16 16:04:38.311 GMT
--ADAM CATALDO
-0- Sep/16/2015 16:04 GMT
Europe is going to be forced to use their military on home soil against "refugees".

How soon before these refugees start burning cities?  Europe better hope for an early snow.

SOCOM on the ground in Syria. They just got the fight they didn't want.

Thanks to William for the link!

via
BFW 09/16 15:33 *US SPECIAL OPS. FORCES ARE ON GROUND IN SYRIA: CNBC
CNBC: RT @CNBCnow: BREAKING: Defense officials tell NBC News that US special ops. forces are on ground in Syria assisting
2015-09-16 15:32:24.247 GMT
RT @CNBCnow: BREAKING: Defense officials
tell NBC News that US special ops. forces
are on ground in Syria assisting Kurdish
forces in fight against ISIS
CNBC @CNBC
1.  This is in response to the mass immigration to Europe.  The reality though?  You're seeing economic migration, these people aren't refugees fleeing a fight.

2.  SOCOM just got the fight they didn't want.  This is the SOCOM centric effort that they will lead and they can't realistically win.

3.  Is it a given that US Special Ops will be battling Russian Marines?

4.  Consider this a "do something" option and not a real strategy.

5.  Nothings changed.  The flow of immigrants will continue, we don't have a strategy so in summation.  We're still fucked.  Should we expect anything different from our current civilian and military leadership?

F-15 2040C Upgrade Package ...


via Flight Global...
Boeing has unveiled an up-gunned version of its supersonic F-15C air superiority jet designed to keep the aging fleet operationally relevant through 2040.
Called 2040C, the upgrade package includes “quad pack” munitions racks designed to double the aircraft’s air-to-air missile payload to 16 and conformal fuel tanks for extended-range flights.
For communications, Boeing is naturally offering “Talon HATE” – the air force’s programme of record for connecting the F-15 with Lockheed Martin’s F-22 Raptor.
In terms of survivability, Boeing’s package includes Raytheon’s APG-63(v)3 active synthetically scanned array (AESA) radar and a long-range infrared search and track (IRST) sensor for “first sight, first shot, first kill” air-to-air combat.
Interesting isn't it.

Many complain about defense corporations fleecing the public, but we're silent when the come up to solutions that could actually help the nation win the next war.

We all know the issues with the F-35.  Can't climb, can't run, can't run.  To add to the misery it can't carry a decent missile load.

The F-15 2040C can.

If the USAF gets serious about maintaining air superiority and winning the air war then it appears Boeing is ready to help make it happen.

Terrex 2 (Advanced) shows up at DSEI..

Thanks to Jonathan for the link!


via Shepard Media.
Singapore Technologies (ST) Kinetics showcased a new and improved version of the 8x8 Terrex infantry carrier vehicle, the Terrex 2, at the DSEI exhibition in London.
Weighing 30 tonnes, the Terrex 2 is bigger than its predecessor and it has a capacity for one extra passenger – totaling 12 soldiers and two crewmen. The heavier body allows installation of a wider range of weaponry, armour and a payload of up to 9 tonnes.
A distinctive feature applied for the first time in such a vehicle is its ‘V-over-V’ lower-hull design for enhanced blast protection. The driver’s compartment also utilises customisable touchscreen interfaces with a surveillance system that provides the crew with a panoramic camera view.
An ST Kinetics spokesman told Shephard, ‘The Terrex 2 is our response to address the growing global demand for an advanced 8x8, which has to be effective in not only urban operations but land and littoral missions too.’
The Terrex 2 is able to integrate a variety of weapon systems, including a 30mm Bushmaster cannon or 12.7mm machine gun.
ST Kinetics, in partnership with US-based Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), is in the running for the USMC Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase 1 Increment 1 (ACV 1.1) programme.
Requirements listed in the ACV project are a ‘particular emphasis on water speed and reserve buoyancy’ so it can operate in 3-foot waves.
‘The Terrex for ACV Phase 1 is essentially a Terrex 2 configured for the specific requirements of the USMC. However, we are not able to share more details as this is an ongoing programme,’ ST Kinetics told Shephard.
The Terrex 2 is designed to perform better in the water for ship-to-shore operations. A distinctive feature is a larger trim vane on the front hull, as well as a better swimming speed of 6 knots with improved amphibious systems.
The Singapore Army currently utilises three known Terrex variants in their two infantry regiments: Infantry Carrier Vehicle, Pioneer and Ambulance. Other variants offered by ST Kinetics include an anti-tank missile carrier and 120mm SRAMS mortar carriage.
Interesting.

A little birdy from Lockheed Martin Ground Vehicles told me that they're gonna be displaying their vehicle at Modern Day Marine....and to "wait to cheer" what they've cooked up....I've tried to get in contact with BAE but lost touch with old contacts and the new guys just don't reach out.

Which leads us back to the Terrex 2 (Advanced).  I can't wait to get a better look at this beast.  Is it just me or does it remind of the Brazilian VBTP?

Radical proposal. Buy Indian Brahmos to use against Chinese ships!

Thanks to Aditya for the link!


via HindustanTimes.
India will carry out maiden tests of its air-launched BrahMos supersonic cruise missile from specially-modified Sukhoi-30 fighter planes from November, BrahMos Aerospace CEO Sudhir Mishra told HT.
Four flight tests will be conducted over a period of six months before the missile is declared ready for deployment on the fighter planes towards mid-2016. The actual missile will be tested in April 2016 following three dummy tests.
The Nasik division of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited has modified two Su-30 fighters to carry the 2.5-tonne missile, the world’s fastest supersonic cruise missile. The second aircraft is expected to be delivered to BrahMos Aerospace by September-end.
The BrahMos missile, an Indo-Russian joint venture, provides India the capability to hit targets 290km away at nearly three times the speed of sound. The missile’s land and naval variants — 500kg heavier than the air version — are already in service.
“The missile will give the IAF extended range capability. No other Air Force has such a powerful cruise missile in its inventory,” Mishra said. The BrahMos missile has three existing variants: Block-I (anti-ship), Block-II (land to land) and Block-III (with steep dive capabilities for mountain warfare).
Payloads over platforms.

Say it over and over like a mantra.

Then consider this radical proposal.  If the former Navy Chief was right then the key to affordability AND lethality is to flip the US script.  We need to improve our missile technology.  But while we're waiting for concepts to be drawn up and test vehicles built we need a stop gap that will put the Chinese Navy on its back foot.

How do we do that?

We think out of the box.  We buy Indian Brahmos missiles.  We know that the Indians are shopping it because I remember a story where they were in talks with the Vietnamese about a potential sale.  Additionally it could be spun as an attempt to bring India into our sphere of influence.

Yes.  We would need to Americanize it but the pure power of the weapon is undeniable.  Add it to our strike complex and its a winner.  Add US electronics to the mix and it could be unbeatable.

I know what your next question is.  Why not buy a European or American missile instead?  Simple.  They don't have the range required to excite....or to be a game changer in the Pacific.  100 mile ranges no longer impress.  We need the distance that only the Brahmos brings.

Haynie/USNI Blog carry the day. Navy/Marines to open combat arms to women.

With more than three months to go before the year-end deadline, the Navy Secretary made it clear on Monday: he will not be requesting any exceptions to the Pentagon edict that all U.S. military jobs be opened to women.
“Nobody’s asking for an exemption in the Navy,” Mabus told an audience at the the City Club of Cleveland. “And I’ve been pretty clear about this for a while – I’m not going to ask for an exemption for the Marines.”
To Haynie and her band of zealots over at the USNI Blog.  You won.  Congrats.  You're wrong as fuck but you won.

Next.  Mabus?  Suck a dick you arrogant bastard.  You're gonna wreck the Marine Corps, fill body bags and lose battles.  You will go down in history as a political hack that fiddled while the Naval Services burned.

To Dunford.  You had your chance to prove your mettle.  You bailed on the Marine Corps to become Chairman of the Joint Chiefs.  You're a politician and a disappointment.  I thought you had moral courage but in the end you're just like the others that are in leadership.  The difference.  Amos was easy to spot.  You had better camouflage.

Rant over.

Russia's Northern Fleet conducts Arctic Amphibious Assault Exercise..



NOTE:  RMT often uses file pics....not from the actual exercise.

via Russia Military Technology.
September 16 - A group of Russian Northern Fleet warships practised an amphibious Arctic landing exercise on Tuesday, the fleet press office told.
The Northern Fleet's Georgy Pobedonosets and Kondopoga large amphibious assault ships reaching Russia’s New Siberian archipelago on Monday, landed marines on Kotelny Island on Tuesday. Arctic brigade units took part in an amphibious operation of this kind for the first time.
"The exercise in amphibious landing onto rough terrain started with the support ofshipborne aircraft. Two Kamov Ka-27 [NATO reporting name: Helix] shipborne helicopters took off from the large antisubmarine ship Severomorsk to transport advance parties to the western shore of Kotelny Island," the press office said.
Then the Georgy Pobedonosets started to land amphibious troops. The ship arrived at the landing site and offloaded vehicles, equipment and personnel. The Kondopoga was the second to land marines on Kotelny Island.
More than 230 servicemen from the Arctic brigade and 30 pieces of wheeled and tracked vehicles, including articulated tracked amphibious snow and swamp-going vehicles with high cross-country ability and MT-LBV multipurpose tractors, were carried to Kotelny Island during the exercise.
Quad bikes recently fielded with the Arctic brigade will be tested in harsh conditions of the Arctic Ocean islands for the first time.
After fighting for amphibious landing and securing positions on the shore, the Arctic brigade’s units moved inland towards the base camp.
During the ships’ stay off the New Siberian archipelago, they will have to conduct all-arms forces’ exercise to protect the archipelago and the Russian Arctic coast, the press office said.
Are you locking onto this?  As far as I know, the US is struggling to deploy modern icebreakers and the Army only has a notional force for combat in the Arctic.  Meanwhile the Russians have formed an Arctic Brigade and are mechanizing it.  If you're a NATO fan the only dedicated force that has proven capability to operate in the Far North to my knowledge are the Royal Marines.  Even the USMC has de-emphasized Arctic operations in the modern era (amazingly enough during the 50's the USMC regularly trained to operate in extreme cold...oh and before you go high and to the right, the Winter package at Bridgeport is a great course, but from what I've read "different" than actual Arctic ops).

F-35. Diminished expectations.


via National Defense.
The F-35's “ability, stealth-wise, to penetrate contested airspace unobserved gives it an advantage over everybody else,” said Gen. Herbert "Hawk" Carlisle at the Air Force Association’s 2015 Air and Space Conference.
The aircraft is not a maneuverability airplane. That’s not what it was designed for, he said. “It’s a multi-role airplane that has an incredibly comprehensive, powerful, integrated avionics and sensor suite. It has incredible electronic warfare in both [electronic countermeasure] and [electronic counter-countermeasure] capability.”
Seems like Axe's article about the F-35 getting curb stomped by a two seat F-16 with wing tanks isn't such garbage after all.

But we've known the truth about the F-35 since 2008.  Remember the Rand Report?
The secret Rand report for the Pentagon wrote, “Inferior acceleration, inferior climb, inferior sustained turn capability. Also has lower top speed. Can’t turn, can’t climb, can’t run.” The military analysts explained that the F-35 would function better as a long-range, mobile missile platform rather than a fighter. The computer models showed that once the jets had lost their element of surprise and launched all their missiles, remaining enemy fighters had no problem clearing them from the sky. The result was the loss of the battle and China’s successful invasion of Taiwan.
So we've known that the F-35 is garbage as an air superiority fighter for almost two decades now.  The only problem is that since the Pentagon didn't acknowledge it and defense reporters didn't dig into the story, the public has been fooled into believing the talking points that the plane is as maneuverable as the F-16/18.

What is a new revelation (at least to me) is how the General is wording the comparison to the A-10.  From the same article...
In terms of close-air support, Carlisle said the F-35 will be highly capable once it finishes its Block 4 software update, and the next-generation electro-optical targeting system has been fully fleshed out. “When you look at what Block 4 is going to be when we get to that in the F-35, then we’re getting to a no kidding CAS platform.”
During the Red Flag exercise this summer at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, the service tested the plane in a close-air support role. “It did exceedingly well in that it could penetrate airspace that other airplanes couldn’t, and it could use electronic warfare to defeat adversaries and defeat surface-to-air capability while at the same time protecting its own sensor suite,” Carlisle said.
He's talking in terms of close air support.  He's talking in terms of having to provide that close air support in an environment where the US doesn't have air superiority.

Am I reading too much into this or did the good General just admit that air superiority is no longer guaranteed and air DOMINANCE is just a pipe dream (notice that the USAF no longer uses that term)?

Freccia 8x8...the other European heavyweight IFV...

Thanks to Jonathan for the link!


via Shepard Media...
Delivery of the first batch of Freccia 8x8 armoured fighting vehicles will be completed by the end of the year, with the exception of 26 vehicles.
So far 160 have been delivered – 126 of which are of the Infantry Fighting Vehicle, 36 anti-tank variants and eight mortar carriers.
According to Iveco-Oto Melara all 160 are operational with the Italian Army’s 82nd Reginment Torino, based in Apulia. The total order for 248 vehicles including: 172 IFVs, 36 anti-tank, 20 C2 and 21 mortar carrying vehicles, was placed with CIO – an consortium of Iveco and Oto Melara – in December 2007.
That leaves 88 remaining, however the company also told Shephard that eight of the mortar carrier and 18 C2 variant vehicles will not be delivered this year, so 52 units are expected to handed over by the end of 2015.
A second batch of 381 vehicles was ordered by Italy in 2014. Iveco-Oto Melara said in a statement: ‘Parliament approved the 2nd Brigade but we are still waiting for the complete funding. We expect a first order for 30 IFV, to be delivered within the year end.’
The breakdown of vehicles includes: 163 IFV, 120 explorer (reconnaissance), 40 recovery, 36 anti-tank, 14 mortar carrier and eight C2.
The IFV variant is fitted with a HITFIST Plus turret armed with an Oerlikon 25mm dual-feed KBA cannon and 7.62mm co-axial MG.
The Explorer reconnaissance vehicles, also called VBM (Veicolo Blindato Medio), still have the HITFIST but are equipped with enhanced ISTAR payload. One type is configured to control UAVs and the other UGVs.
Meanwhile, the anti-tank version is equipped with the Rafael Spike long-range ATGM mounted on the side of the turret.
The company added that they are still ‘waiting for funding’ for an order for the SuperAV vehicle that will replace the existing tracked amphibious vehicles in the Italian Army and Navy. A contract for 72 vehicles for the army and 72 vehicles for the navy is expected.
A few things.

When we talk about heavyweight wheeled IFVs, there is always one vehicle we leave out...the Freccia.  Quite honestly its armored protection (at least on paper) rivals that of the Boxer and its mobility is a high point of the design.  One unusual thing about this vehicle is the fact that the Italians seem to be sticking with the 25mm cannon.  Could this be a side effect of their doctrine?  Their is a tank destroyer version of the vehicle so its possible that because they have a family of vehicles, provide their IFVs with anti-tank missiles and because they're even moving toward integrating UAVs into their armored formations that they don't see a need to upsize their guns.

The last thing is the SuperAV.  The vehicle seems to be languishing.  They have yet to put it into service and I'm really beginning to wonder if the Italians are simply waiting and watching.  If the USMC keeps using the AAV into 2030 and beyond, the thinking might be why should they upgrade?

First production Scout SV (Ajax)

Thanks to John for the link!