Sunday, September 11, 2022

You people might not like it but many Americans are questioning the aid to Ukraine...

A corrupt country. Sending billions of dollars of weapons with no accountability. Supporting their govt with copious amounts of aid (that is somehow not getting reported...who the fuck do you think is paying salaries of soldiers and bureaucrats over there?) and no end in sight.

Let me ask my fellow Americans one thing.

Have you noticed that the most fevered supporters of continuing support for Ukraine are almost always Europeans (read the comments here and then check the IP addresses)?  Additionally have you noticed its always for the US to do more, not for THEM to do more?

Make no mistake clowns.

The closer the Ukrainians (and probably the Poles...they want this fight!) get to the Russian border the more easily this thing could spin out of control.

One malfunctioning rocket (or ordered to attack a target by a Commanding Officer that goes batshit crazy) that flies into Russia and somehow hits a target that is of importance and you could be looking at WW3.

Saturday, September 10, 2022

Ukraine - Russia War. Where are we now?

 Ukraine has launched its offensive and that makes sense. I've been wondering why the US has been giving them so much money lately...above and beyond simply resupplying their military, we're now subsidizing their govt.

So why now?

I think it all comes back to winter.

A few things are coming...

1.  The populations in Europe and the US will be enraged by high energy prices.  If you've been paying attention (at least in the US) you'll see that gas prices have come down.  Why?  Fewer people driving.

But the sick thing is that energy bills have been spiking!  I've experienced that myself!  But why?  Easy. You see gas prices everyday, you get that bill for your home energy bill just once a month.  

The average person rages for a few days and then daily life gets back in the way.  It's forgotten till (for far too many) money gets slim between paydays and when you go to the grocery store (high prices there too) you have to decide between your usual brand or a generic because of price.

2.  I think the allies are reaching their limit.  Limit as in weaponry they can contribute.  Remember this isn't wartime situation for the NATO countries.  They can retool but won't do it in such a way that wrecks budgets (except for Poland...those fuckers are damn near begging for a fight with Russia...they want it so bad they can taste it!).

A big push now or Ukraine will lose its support, not out of desire but out of ability.

The push to end the war in favorable terms for the Ukrainians is now.  If Russia can hang on till winter then Ukraine is doomed.

3.  Alot of talk about Russia buying weapons from N. Korea.  This shit is so simple I can't believe I have to explain it.  N. Korea is a middle man. China has started supply Russia.  Its covert.  Its deniable but it will be effective.

As far as buying drones from Iran?  Iranian drones have whacked the fuck outta US forces in Iraq and Syria.  They've made the Saudis shit the bed (in the hands of the Houthis they've been savaging Saudi installations).

Those are my thoughts on the situation.  What are yours?

Open Comment Post. 10 Sep 22

 


Friday, September 09, 2022

Is Sparta Overrated? A List of Spartan Defeats

 via History & Headlines

Sparta has however won a number of victories, although you might notice this list is actually shorter than the list of Spartan defeats.  These include the following battles:


In c. 682 BC, Sparta won a decisive victory over Messenia and Arcadia in the Battle of the Great Foss.


In 457 BC, 11,500 Spartans defeated 14,000 Athenians in the Battle of Tanagra.  Casualties and losses for the battle are unknown.


In 494 BC, Sparta defeated Argos in the Battle of Sepeia.  Argos’s casualties and losses numbered 6,000.


In 417 BC, in the Second Battle of Hysiae, the Spartans captured the Argive town of Hysiae, taking all the male citizens as hostages before subsequently killing the hostages.


In 411 BC, 9,000 Spartans defeated 8,000 Athenians in the Battle of Syme.  Spartan casualties and losses numbered 900, whereas Athens’s casualties and losses numbered 2,900!


In September 411 BC, 8,000 Spartans defeated 11,000 Athenians in the Battle of Eretria.  Sparta’s casualties and losses numbered 1,100; Athens’s casualties and losses numbered 4,000+.


In 406 BC, Sparta with 90 ships managed to defeat Athens with 80 ships at the Battle of Notium.  Sparta suffered no casualties, but Athens lost 15-22 ships.


Also in 406 BC, Sparta’s 170 ships defeated Athens’s 70 ships in the Battle of Mytilene.


In 405 BC, 180 ships fighting for Sparta, Persia, Corinth, and the Peloponnesian League won the decisive Battle of Aegospotami over 170 ships fighting for Athens and the Delian League.  While Spartan losses were minimal, Athens lost 150 ships and also 3,000 sailors who were executed.  Athens was then besieged.  Athens’s surrender ended the Peloponnesian War.


In 403 BC, Sparta defeated Athenian exiles in the Battle of Piraeus.  Although Spartan losses are unknown, over 180 Athenian exiles were killed.


In 394 BC, 18,000 Spartan hoplites defeated 24,000 hoplites from Thebes, Argos, Athens, and Corinth in the Battle of Nemea at a cost of 1,100 dead or wounded Spartans and 2,800 dead or wounded Thebans, Argives, Athenians, and Corinthians.


In 394 BC, Sparta and Orchomenus with a strength of 15,000 defeated Thebes, Argos, and allies with a strength of 20,000 in the Battle of Coronea.  The victors suffered casualties and losses numbering 350 versus the losers suffering casualties and losses numbering 600.


In Spring 272 BC, 2,000+ Spartans and Macedonians defeated 27,000 men and 24 elephants from Epirus in the Siege of Sparta.  Casualties and losses were heavy on both sides.

Here 

Interesting.

Are the Spartans as we know them today a product of a fucking comic book?

Oh what's that?  You didn't know that the movie "300" was based on a comic?

Yeah.

From my recollection that's when Sparta and Spartans gained or regained their modern day fame (when the movie came out).

I've been checking out ancient battles and when it comes to warriors of note, the Spartans are just one of many groups. I think the society...every man a warrior is part of the appeal, but the same could be said of other nations of that era too.

One thing is certain.

While famed, the societal model was flawed. As with everything from the past you can take bits and pieces to form a "perfect union" but as a whole it just wouldn't work.

Quite honestly the society as seen in Starship Troopers (the book) is probably the closest thing that we could put together considering modern society...but even that would take bloodshed to get to.

Battalion Landing Team 2/5, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit conduct fast rope training aboard USS New Orleans (LPD 18) in the Sea of Japan

Late Open Comment Post. 9 Sep 22

This is one big freaking dog!

Illinois lawmakers have gone BATSHIT CRAZY! WATCH THE ENTIRE VID!

Air Dominance is out. Air Denial is the new Airpower goal?

 via Defense News

Through a strategy of air denial, the United States would not seek to gain air superiority but instead work with allies and partners to implement a smarter defense-in-vertical depth approach, layering the effects of cyber disruptions, electromagnetic jamming, ground-based air defenses, drones and counter-air operations in increasing degrees of strength, from higher to lower altitudes.

Here 

Wow.

You do know what this really means don't you?  It means that the Air Force is (and consider this a rollout of the new concept) giving up on the idea of air superiority against a peer threat (namely China).

Instead of seeking air superiority or the more arrogant form...air dominance, they're lowering expectations and telling us all (to include American Ground Forces) that air denial will have to be enough.

This is huge.

US ground forces should prepare poste haste for the reality that they're going to face not only artillery, missile artillery and drones...BUT ALSO air attacks by manned aircraft.

Can you imagine the carnage that a Chinese equivalent of a B-52 arc light strike would have on an armored, mech or infantry division?

Is the nation even capable of bouncing back from a massive attack on our ground forces (because the Air Force couldn't stop them) from the air that eradicated an entire division?

Heads would roll in the Pentagon.

Note.  This article is pushing the deterrence narrative but the reality is that if deterrence doesn't work then the fight is on.

Thursday, September 08, 2022

I am open to future warfare. I want to know more about loitering munitions...a big item in the USMC's next budget...

 via Defense News.

It also tested organic precision fires — or loitering munitions — in a larger vehicle-mounted and a lighter infantry-operated form factor, hitting moving targets 89 kilometers (55 miles) away.

Deputy Commandant talking about the future USMC budget here 

Read the whole article.  To be blunt it didn't capture my attention much and quite honestly I thought it was alot of bullshit about a concept that I remain unsold on.

Stand In Force.

Recon/Counter Recon.

As concepts I believe they'll fade away soon enough and are probably being swept away by Chinese planners as we speak.  If not by them then by our so called allies in the region (like the Solomon islands that are pro-Chinese...we didn't know we were behind the eight ball till it was a done deal...I expect that is happening all over the Pacific...these countries aren't on our side, they'll wait to see who wins and deal with whoever that is!).

But hitting moving targets at 55 miles?  Without calling in Division Artillery?

Fucking awesome.

I want to know more about that and the plans for that capability. The Light Amphibious Warship?  Navy ain't buying on that.  35 of them?  The Marine Corps is smoking crack.  The Navy would rather buy more frigates and destroyers...the Marine Corps will have to do with the ships it has.