Friday, May 06, 2011
Thursday, May 05, 2011
Questions about the Raid that I'd love answered...
Just a few questions I'd love answers to...
1. Why do Navy SEALs trace their ancestory to UDT instead of Navy Scouts and Raiders?
2. Why did JSOC choose to go with the 160th instead of AFSOC?
(a) Is it because AFSOC chose the wrong platform? (CV-22 instead of MH-47)
(b) Does this indicate that the 160th is considered a higher tiered unit?
(c) How have they been able to keep a top secret aircraft under wraps in the middle of Kentucky?
3. What was the backup force? Army Rangers? More SEALs?
4. How did SEAL Team 6 get the mission instead of DELTA?
5. What has DELTA been doing? SEAL TEAM 6 has been all over the news lately...what are the other Supermen in the DoD doing.
6. Was a package of fast movers available to provide assistance? How many, what type, what branch?
7. How big a force was the SEALs thought capable of engaging? If a platoon of terrorist were inside the compound...detected 10 minutes before landing would that have scrubbed the mission?
8. Is it common for the President to personally observe these type missions? I'm fairly certain that they've thought that they had "him" before.
9. What other assets were dedicated to this mission? A commenter on ARES suggests that jammer aircraft, command and control platforms etc were assisting. Is this true? If so then why is that considered a secret?
10. Once it was determined that the helicopter was not completely destroyed, why wasn't an airstrike called in to finish the job. Could the remnants give clues to our enemies about our classified aircraft?
11. Who was in control of this mission? JSOC? Central Command? CIA? Or was it run out of the Sec of Defense's office?
Just a few quick questions. If you have more then send them my way.
1. Why do Navy SEALs trace their ancestory to UDT instead of Navy Scouts and Raiders?
2. Why did JSOC choose to go with the 160th instead of AFSOC?
(a) Is it because AFSOC chose the wrong platform? (CV-22 instead of MH-47)
(b) Does this indicate that the 160th is considered a higher tiered unit?
(c) How have they been able to keep a top secret aircraft under wraps in the middle of Kentucky?
3. What was the backup force? Army Rangers? More SEALs?
4. How did SEAL Team 6 get the mission instead of DELTA?
5. What has DELTA been doing? SEAL TEAM 6 has been all over the news lately...what are the other Supermen in the DoD doing.
6. Was a package of fast movers available to provide assistance? How many, what type, what branch?
7. How big a force was the SEALs thought capable of engaging? If a platoon of terrorist were inside the compound...detected 10 minutes before landing would that have scrubbed the mission?
8. Is it common for the President to personally observe these type missions? I'm fairly certain that they've thought that they had "him" before.
9. What other assets were dedicated to this mission? A commenter on ARES suggests that jammer aircraft, command and control platforms etc were assisting. Is this true? If so then why is that considered a secret?
10. Once it was determined that the helicopter was not completely destroyed, why wasn't an airstrike called in to finish the job. Could the remnants give clues to our enemies about our classified aircraft?
11. Who was in control of this mission? JSOC? Central Command? CIA? Or was it run out of the Sec of Defense's office?
Just a few quick questions. If you have more then send them my way.
They should have named an aircraft carrier after him.
Thanks Craig for sending me this vid.
Remember this post on the naming of a new Destroyer after LT Murphy? They should have named an aircraft carrier after this American hero.
This is the story that the Navy should be shouting to the rooftops.
Remember this post on the naming of a new Destroyer after LT Murphy? They should have named an aircraft carrier after this American hero.
This is the story that the Navy should be shouting to the rooftops.
Wednesday, May 04, 2011
A proper tribute.
F-35B hits another milestone.
Posted by David Cenciotti...he's got a serial number from the downed helo!
You have got to go to David's Blog to read the story on this. His reporting on the air war in Libya is second to none and his coverage of this 'stealth' helo ranks up there as well.
MASSIVE HAT TIP TO YOU DAVID!
CAD of the damaged MH-60 tail section.
David sent me this CAD of the tail section of the MH-60. Now if this doesn't grab your attention nothing will. According to the comments section on this website, it originated on Military Photos.
Thanks David! This is beyond interesting.
Thanks David! This is beyond interesting.
Tuesday, May 03, 2011
Geez! What does it take to kill this thing! The Vampire engine rises again.
Wow. I was amazed to read this. Thanks Joe for sending it... GE (and an obviously loopy Congressman from Ohio seated in the
WASHINGTON — The Department of Defense hasofficially canceled a contract for a General Electric-developed F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. Both the Houseand the Senate have blocked funding for it, arguing that one engine for one plane is enough.
Connecticut-based Pratt & Whitney won the original contract for one engine, while a GE-Rolls Royce alliance has been developing a second engine. The latter has become a symbol of government waste, and the White House has promised to veto any bill that funded the alternate program.
Yet the engine simply won’t die.
The House Armed Services Committee released its spending outlines for the coming fiscal year Tuesday, and the second engine is right back in.
Private William Hudson in Aliens
Pmiglio put together every line uttered by Hudson in Aliens...pretty funny...besides...we needed a little change of pace.
Boeing...you suck.
Trimble over at the Dew Line linked to what he called some very cool photos released by Boeing. Can't tell because you have to be a registered journalist to get the hi-rez version of them.
Really?
Really Boeing?
Have they kicked you in the nuts so many times that you've turned into penny pinching idiots? I mean for heaven sakes...they have military equipment being sold to my nation and yours...they're trying to rally the public to speak up for this domestic company and the sorry bastards want to charge for high resolution pics?
Heck, I'd register and get them for ya but guess what! Unless you have an Aviation Week or Flight Global beside your name then you're just not relevant in their eyes.
Amazing.
Boeing. You Suck.
Take a page from Lockheed Martin...EADS...General Dynamics etc. Your public relations model is from the 18th century.
Really?
Really Boeing?
Has the fight with Airbus made you this big a pussy?
Have they kicked you in the nuts so many times that you've turned into penny pinching idiots? I mean for heaven sakes...they have military equipment being sold to my nation and yours...they're trying to rally the public to speak up for this domestic company and the sorry bastards want to charge for high resolution pics?
Heck, I'd register and get them for ya but guess what! Unless you have an Aviation Week or Flight Global beside your name then you're just not relevant in their eyes.
Amazing.
Boeing. You Suck.
Take a page from Lockheed Martin...EADS...General Dynamics etc. Your public relations model is from the 18th century.
It’s like a football lineman with the speed of a wide receiver and the skills of a quarterback.
Centcom Blog goes "loopy" over the CH-47...you have got to read this love fest! Just kidding...kinda...but the good Major would definitely get a tingle if he ever flew the CH-53 if the '47 can do this for him (well if it was a newer or recently refurbished model anyway).
Monday, May 02, 2011
F-35 and F-22...Together at last!
Did we see the deployment of the CV-22?
Looks like I was not only wrong, but TOTALLY WRONG! Thanks Rohan for setting me straight. He stated that the briefing indicated two MH-47G's were involved along with a pair of Black Hawks. Sounds like the Night Stalkers were out playing.
I wonder if this will add a bit to the USAF's choice of their next Rescue Helicopter?
Sunday, May 01, 2011
America...are you really this naive?
pic from MSNBC News. |
Really?
Are we really this naive America?
Does anyone believe that the world is a safer place now?
Does anyone not believe that the shooting of the Air Force personnel might not have been in retaliation and that there is more to come?
Does anyone believe that our Marines, Soldiers, Airmen and Sailors that are going out on patrol tomorrow are going to be welcomed as liberators and not have to worry about the usual -- dodging snipers and avoiding mines/ied's?
To my British friends I apologize but this is as news worthy as the Royal Wedding---meaning not news worthy at all.
The wars continue boys and girls...your sons and daughters are still in danger and still doing dangerous work.
Don't be naive and don't forget it.
UPDATE:
Military Times is reporting how former President Bush is reacting to the news of OBL's reckoning.
UPDATE 1:
Ok, let me be a bit more clear. I don't mind playing the part of the Ugly American...done it many times, have the role down pat and can even do it in my sleep. But this is sophomoric! NOTHINGS CHANGED! But some are celebrating...maybe its an urban vs. rural thing. Maybe its a military vs. civilian thing. Maybe its a conservative vs. liberal thing....but I just don't get it.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)