Saturday, December 24, 2011
Friday, December 23, 2011
Marine cargo UAV in Afghanistan...
Australia's Army to be amphibious in nature.
Phil sent me this article(thanks!) regarding the Australian Army's plan to become amphibious in culture throughout. In other words a Marine Corps in everything except name! Read the whole thing here but...
Lieutenant General Morrison said, "the Army's Deployable Joint Force Headquarters will foster and develop an amphibious culture across Army, but it will take some time to master. The important point is that the Army is committed to developing this aspect of its operations."Wow.
To reinforce Army's commitment, the Chief of Army has designated the 2nd Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment (2RAR) to form the core of Army's contribution to a future amphibious force as this developmental work is done.
"2RAR will work on a day to day basis with Navy and Air Force on the LHDs and other amphibious platforms to further develop this joint capability."
In his inaugural year as Chief of Army, Lieutenant General Morrison expressed his confidence in Plan BEERSHEBA to deliver an Army that is robust, relevant and capable for the tasks directed by Government.
"Our modern Army is moving into the future with a new perspective and a smarter way of doing business and delivering capability within the resources we have," Lieutenant General Morrison said.
"Plan BEERSHEBA will ensure that Army can continue to contribute forces to operations including Afghanistan, until the mission is complete, and will successfully transition to a force that maintains high levels of readiness to react to the range of Australia's Defence needs as they arise.
"On operations and at home, it means we will derive the full value from our Army."
UPDATE:
With the Australian Army making a move in this direction and with the Canberra Class having a well deck, does it make sense for them to move toward either an LCAC type landing craft or an AAV type IFV? I think so but time will tell. Either way its crystal clear why the Marine Corps was invited to establish a base in Northern Australia and not a US Army unit.
Best explanation of F-35 capabilities that I've read.
Joe sent me this article (thanks guy!) where the author outlines the case for the F-35 as the ultimate multi-role/air superiority fighter of its generation (to include the F-22...if he's right then that explains why the former SecDef canceled it)
He's an unashamed supporter of the program and he gives the best explanation of the F-35's capabilities that I've read. Read the whole thing but a snippet.
Interesting.The F-35 is the first aircraft in history with a 360 degree field of vision out to 800 miles, managed by an integrated combat system. Make no mistake -- the F-35 is a full combat system, not just a platform. The beauty of a combat system is the maintenance, upgrades, deployment readiness, development synergies provided by common software for upgrades and development.The F-35 will revolutionize air combat operations, especially in the Pacific. Fifth generation aircraft like the F-35 are at the heart of a potential new air combat system enterprise. The F-22s may have been the harbinger, but it lacks the essential air combat systems present on the F-35. Deployed as a force, the JSF enables distributed air operations that are crucial to the survival of our pilots in the period ahead. Distributed operations are the cultural shift that fifth generation aircraft, along with investments in new weapons, remotely piloted aircraft and the crafting of simultaneous rather than sequential operations, bring to the fight.The Japanese understand the opportunities to leverage the F-35 combat system enterprise and that is why they chose the aircraft.Before the JSF, military leaders would have to tack on additional systems to legacy aircraft to provide new capabilities. The pilot would be forced to manage each new system. The F-35's five major combat systems are already integrated and interact with each other to provide capabilities. The functional capabilities that emerge from that interaction are done by the machine and are not simply correlated with a single system. For example, jamming can be done by several systems aboard the JSF but the machine decides which one to use. And the entire system rests on a common architecture with broadband capabilities.
Thursday, December 22, 2011
How the UK will lose the Falklands...
Check out the article from the Daily Mail...but as always a few tidbits...
The date is July 27, 2012, and in London the Olympic Games are about to begin. For months, the British people have been looking forward to the jamboree of patriotic enthusiasm.
But now that the day is here, the mood feels heavy with gloom. The crowds are thin, the drizzle pours down. The Union Flags hang forlornly in the dull breeze.
Even the nation's new Prime Minister, the blinking, stammering Ed Miliband, cuts a remarkably limp figure, a melancholy leader for a nation sunk in misery....
...Under the terms of the Strategic Defence and Security Review, the government had committed itself to scrapping the Harrier Jump Jets and decommissioning the aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal, effectively hobbling its capacity to strike back against an Argentine invasion.Read the entire article...those are only two passages...but also read the comments section over at Think Defence.
In October 2010, Admiral Sir Sandy Woodward, the architect of victory in the South Atlantic in 1982, warned that a surprise attack would be 'highly likely to succeed'.
Thanks to the swingeing cuts, he insisted, the Argentines could take the islands 'with barely a shot being fired'.
But to their eternal shame, the Coalition ignored his warnings. And they even ignored an even more aggressive bout of sabre-rattling from Mrs Kirchner, who declared the following summer that Britain was merely a 'crude colonial power in decline'.
All this, however, was merely a taste of what was to come...
I continue to be amazed at the arrogance of opinion by some of the commenters. The idea that they could be under threat of having their islands attacked seems almost foreign to them. They deride the Argentinian military and have a vision of the Royal Navy from the '80's.
They ignore the draconian cuts forced on the Navy by the Royal Air Force and British Army. They still believe that they're a world power even though they're only willing to fund a Navy at the rate of a 1st rate Coast Guard.
Trouble is coming and those that are warning of the danger are being ignored and belittled. Neville Chamberlain would be proud.
Aselsan Tank Modernization
Interesting video. They claim that this upgrade is a step beyond the Leopard 2A6 but I just don't see it. Any Tankers know for sure?
A waste of an aircraft carrier...
Above you see a drawing of the "proposed" HMS Queen Elizabeth class that was canceled. Note that it came in at around 60,000 tons, was to carry 24 Phantom fighters, 12 Buccaneers and presumably at least a couple or 6 helicopters for various duties (including plane guard).
Fast forward to today and what do we have the British Ministry of Defense planning for their flagship in terms of aircraft? 12. A grand total of 12 fighters.
Say that out loud and see if it makes sense to you. 12 fighters on a 60,000 ton aircraft carrier. What a waste of a fabulous capability.
USMC goes full bore with civilian shooters...
I keep saying that civilian shooting in the US is leading the military and influencing its training and equipment set more and more.
The above video is just more evidence of that trend.
Battalion Landing Team 1/2 conduct beach raid exercise
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Vice Adm. David Venlet brings in his boys...
Note that this is pure speculation on my part...
But it appears that Admiral Venlet is solidifying his grip on the F-35 program. Management classes teach that if you're going to be a 'change agent' that you need to have your people in places of power to see your vision carried out to completion.
Now check out this press release from NAVAIR...
NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND, PATUXENT RIVER, Md.—Building on his history as a test pilot , Navy Capt. Erik Etz recently assumed duties here as the senior military representative of the F-35 Integrated Test Force (ITF).
Etz became the director for Test and Evaluation of F-35 Naval Variants in November, and replaces Marine Corps Col. Roger Cordell, who on Dec. 21 took command of Naval Test Wing Atlantic, which includes the “Salty Dogs” of Air Test and Evaluation Squadron (VX) 23.
“We could not have selected anyone better than Erik for the demands of the job at Pax River,” said Vice Adm. David Venlet, Joint Strike Fighter program executive officer. “Roger did a fantastic job of capitalizing on the momentum built in B and C test evaluation there in the past year, and I’m fully confident Erik will maintain that momentum.”
An F/A-18 pilot, Etz was the deputy lead for the F-35 Mission Systems Integrated Product Team at the Joint Strike Fighter Program Office in Crystal City, Va. He is a 1998 graduate of the U.S. Navy Test Pilot School, and completed two tours in VX-23, including a lead role in the third sea trials for the F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet.
“The ITF this year has really ramped up the pace and diversity of flight test, completing initial ship trials for [the short takeoff and vertical landing variant], first catapult testing, including [the electromagnetic aircraft launching system], and getting ahead on test points,” Etz said. “I look forward to another great year of retiring risk in 2012, so we can get these aircraft out to the fleet.”
The F-35B short take-off and vertical landing variant and the F-35C carrier variant of the Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter are undergoing test and evaluation at NAS Patuxent River. The jets represent the next generation of tactical aircraft for the Navy, Marine Corps and international partners.
During his operational tours, including command of the “Stingers” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 113, Etz completed multiple carrier-based deployments, most recently in support of Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan. He has more than 3,300 flight hours in 35 types of aircraft, including over 2,700 hours in F/A-18 variants and more than 840 carrier landings on 14 different aircraft carriers.
Cordell’s yearlong stint included managing the F-35 ITF of more than 700 military, civilian and industry personnel. The team completed delivery of six test aircraft, including all three of the F-35C variants, bringing the total test force to eight.
“I have never been associated with a group of people who faced a more daunting challenge with the inspiring spirit, confidence and ability so prevalent at the ITF,” Cordell wrote in a note to the ITF. “Future success in delivering F-35 to the warfighter depends on your continued commitment to doing things right, trusting your judgment and voicing concerns.”
Read this part again...
commitment to doing things right, trusting your judgment and voicing concerns.”Call me chicken little but it appears that more is going on behind the scenes then meets the eye. Still a fan of the airplane but the action isn't at Lockheed Martin or the Pentagon anymore. The action is at the Program Office and that's where I'll be turning my binoculars!
The Falklands...a flashpoint for 2012...
Think Defence took me to task for my thinking that the Falklands was endangered in this post.
Take the time to read his entire article and then read the comments section.
Then read this from DefenceTalk...
A South American trading bloc that includes Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay agreed Tuesday to close its ports to ships flying the flag of the disputed Falkland Islands, Uruguay's president said.The presidents of the Mercosur countries agreed at a summit here that ships flying the Falklands flag "should not dock in Mercosur ports, and if that were to happen, they should not be accepted in another Mercosur port," Uruguay's President Jose Mujica said.A statement issued at the end of the summit said member countries would adopt "all measures that can be put in place to impede the entry to its ports of ships that fly the illegal flag of the Malvinas Islands."Argentina's President Cristina Kirchner, who took over the presidency of the trade bloc from Mujica, thanked her fellow presidents for the show of support for Buenos Aires in its dispute with Britain over the South Atlantic archipelago.Those that don't see the clouds or hear the drumbeats are fooling themselves. Argentina has just set the stage diplomatically for the South American "federation" to unite behind a particular cause.
Unless the British respond appropriately then this is going to be a mission accomplished without a shot being fired.
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Marines revolutionize the battlefield...again...
The US Marine Corps has a proud history of being "combat innovators"...It seems like that tradition continues...
via Ares...
Updated again on 12/20
Word has come down to me that the K-MAX has not only successfully completed its maiden cargo flight, but is in fact now fully operational. Open source reporting has said that there are two K-MAX unmanned helicopters in Afghanistan, which would presumably mean that both are up and running when and where they're needed. It also looks like they're probably only flying at night, according to information put out by NAVAIR. “Most of the missions will be conducted at night and at higher altitudes,” said Marine Capt. Caleb Joiner, mission commander. “This will allow us to keep out of small arms range.”
[UPDATED]
First to fight.On Saturday morning, the ISAF Joint Command (IJC) in Afghanistan confirmed that the K-MAX unmanned helicopter had (or will some time today) fly its first cargo mission in Afghanistan, meaning that if all goes well, we’re now in the age of unmanned logistics. In response to an email,the IJC writes back:“The first unmanned flight without cargo was 15 December. It is scheduled for its first unmanned flight with cargo, today, 17 December.”
First to revolutionize the modern battlefield.
Terminal Lance...when you eat it..
Terminal Lance is crazy as hell...but speaks much truth!
But even funnier is the commentary that he provides....
But even funnier is the commentary that he provides....
…you’ll shit bricks.
Ask any Marine, Soldier, Airman or Sailor and they’ll tell you that the “Meal, Ready to Eat” (MRE) we’re issued every field op does excruciating and somewhat absurd things to the colon and bowels on its digestive quest through the body. I don’t think I’ve ever actually figured out what causes the phenomenon, or whether it’s intentional by the manufacturer (I say manufacturer, because I assure you… MRE’s are not “made” or “cooked”–they are manufactured). The side effect of fake ingredients and preservatives provides the average Marine with a few day’s worth of stored up, rock hard poop ready to wreak its wrath upon any nigh port-a-shitters.
There are two noteworthy benefits the infamous “MRE shit”:
I suppose being backed up for days on end is unusual and generally unwanted for the average person–I know that now, as a civilian, I value my morning coffee-poops like any red-blooded American should. However, when you’re sleeping in filth and you’re stuck in the field doing a lot of physical work, not having to excrete your bowels at a normal rate is good because it keeps you less likely to be in the head when shit goes downhill. God help you when you do–it will be a trip to the john you won’t forget. You’ll brace yourself, bite your lip and push with all the might and power that your creator has bestowed upon you to pass these epic shits. But when they’re done, their rock-solid composition has left your backside surprisingly clean.
- You poop once every couple of days.
- The “clean wipe”
This leads to the second benefit: the clean wipe. As mentioned, being in the field means you’ll be sleeping in your own filth and not bathing for days. What could be better than walking out of the head with your rectum as clean as you came in? Plus, it’s just cool to go for the wipe and come up white.
Composite Unit Training Exercise
All photos by Lance Cpl. Michael Petersheim
Monday, December 19, 2011
My take on why the Japanese chose the F-35...
My take on why the Japanese chose the F-35...and why the Eurofighter keeps losing...
1. Relationships count. The European community has been a practical no show in the Pacific. Until they make themselves more visible and become more active, they won't crack this market.
2. Costs count. Many are making an issue of the price tag of the F-35, but the latest costs came out for a little over 110 million for the airplane. You can play all the accounting tricks that you want but this plane is still in development and its coming in at the same price points as legacy aircraft with bells and whistles.
3. Twin engines are no longer supreme in over sea combat. I always thought twin engine reliability has always been over stated. The Japanese have operated their version of the F-16 in the sea strike role for a while and the F-35 will too. The thought that twin engines are a must have make as much sense as four engines being necessary for large airplanes operating over water.
4. China is a threat. This is probably the biggest factor. No matter how much some want to think of China as being a non-issue in the Pacific, that's just not the case. We're on the cusp of a major arms race in the Pacific and the reason is China.
What should scare critics is that the F-35 is on the verge of "Western World" domination. It will have 10 firm partner nations and two observer nations. This has happened before and it did not spell the end of fighter development in other companies. The European's need to quickly and efficiently start development on a 5th or 6th generation fighter in order to remain viable...the thought that they will be able to catch up via UAVs is wishful thinking. Due to government policy in the EU, US equipment will always get a battle test first and is usually looked at as being the best in the world.
Long story short. No one should be surprised.
Breaking! Japan picks F-35...
via Reuters...
(Reuters) - Japan picked Lockheed Martin's F-35 jet as its next mainstay fighter, choosing the radar-evading plane over combat proven but less stealthy rivals, as concerns simmer over North Korea after the death of leader Kim Jong-il and as China works to introduce its own stealth fighters.
Tuesday's decision comes as a shot in the arm for Lockheed Martin's F-35 program, which has been restructured twice in the past two years, and is expected to increase the odds that South Korea will follow suit with its own order for 60 fighters.
The F-35, which is in an early production stage, competed against Boeing's F/A-18 and the Eurofighter Typhoon, made by a consortium of European companies including BAE Systems, for a deal that could be worth up to $8 billion.
"This program badly needed an endorsement like this, particularly one from a technically respected customer. But there are still many complications, especially price tag and work share demands," said Richard Aboulafia, an analyst with the Virginia-based Teal Group.
He noted the F-35 program is facing tough scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers and defense officials who need to trim hundreds of billions of dollars from the U.S. defense budget over the next decade.
Japan, which counts the United States as its key security ally and regularly conducts joint military drills with U.S. forces, had been widely expected to choose the F-35 due to its advanced stealth capability and U.S. origin.
Fighter jets' stealth technology has drawn heavy attention in Japan since China, which has a long-running territorial dispute with Japan, in January confirmed it had held its first test flight of the J-20 stealth fighter jet.
North Korean state TV announced on Monday that Pyongyang's 69-year-old leader had died on Saturday from "physical and mental overwork."
(Additional reporting by Andrew Shalal-Esa, writing by Leika Kihara and Linda Sieg; Editing by Michael Watson and Edwina Gibbs)
LVTP(X) information request...
Hey all.
I need info, if you have on the LVTP(X). Little information is found on the web. Even the Marine Historical sites have little information on it. It appears to have been developed by FMC and was competing against the current AAV for the role. As a side note, I do realize that it was a modified M-113 (Sparks loved it), I'm aware that its sporting a 90mm gun in its turret...what I don't know is water speed, and why it was rejected by the Marines. I suspect it had something to do with the number of troops carried but I'd like to be sure.
I need info, if you have on the LVTP(X). Little information is found on the web. Even the Marine Historical sites have little information on it. It appears to have been developed by FMC and was competing against the current AAV for the role. As a side note, I do realize that it was a modified M-113 (Sparks loved it), I'm aware that its sporting a 90mm gun in its turret...what I don't know is water speed, and why it was rejected by the Marines. I suspect it had something to do with the number of troops carried but I'd like to be sure.
That's cute. Locals confuse X-47 with a UFO...
Wait...if you can't identify what is obviously an aerial vehicle then by definition it is a UFO!
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)