Wednesday, March 27, 2013

No more Sea King search and rescue for the UK.



Wow.

I can't imagine the Coast Guard or the Navy, Air Force or Marines or Local Law Enforcement/Federal Law Enforcement NOT doing search and rescue in the US.

I'm all for private firms doing the work that government should not do but I don't think this is one of those cases.

This isn't beat up on the UK week, but they definitely do things differently.

Red line---no reaction!


Just an observation.

Last week the news media reported that chemical weapons were used in Syria.

I have heard no response from the White House, Pentagon or State Dept.

I definitely don't want to see boots on the ground in Syria...not even Special Ops Raids.  But.  What happens if a nation state is allowed to use chemical weapons without consequence?  If there is no consequence then does our attempts at nuclear containment make sense?  Chemical weapons (as the accident in India many years ago) can be just as deadly as nuclear weapons.

I think we just saw any attempt at the appearance of common sense in our foreign policy (if we ever had any) just evaporate.

Can the Marines survive? A revolutionary speaks.


Thanks for the article Dave!

via Foreign Policy.
The Marines could have pushed for change 10 years ago. Following the 9/11 attacks, then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld approached the Marine commandant and asked if the Marines could take on a special operations role within the Department of Defense. For the secretary, it seemed logical. The Marine Corps is designed to operate independently when necessary; it can sustain itself with a well-oiled logistics organization, and it even has its own air wings. At the time, most special operations forces resided in the Army and in Navy Special Warfare and there was an emerging shortage of operators. The Corps could have filled the gap in special forces that existed right after 9/11.
This article was like a bottle of Tabascco Sauce on eggs in the morning.  Just a dash makes your day, too much sets you on fire.

I read this and I was ready to punch walls.  NEVERTHELESS I HIGHLY RECOMMEND YOU READ IT ALL!

My opinion.

1.  The guy is obviously one of the "reformers"...by that he's one of the Special Ops or nothing.  He fits well with the current Commandant's MARSOC push.
2.  He either ignores or doesn't understand the role that Marine Infantry has played in support of Special Ops.  He also ignores the "Special Ops Capable" role that the MEU's have played for almost 3 decades now.
3.  He wants the Marine Corps to tailor itself to a supporting role for Special Ops via supporting fires....we already do it but not to the extent that he wants.
4.  He wants to fight the last war.  Ignoring the nations need to have a robust, capable force, that is forward deployed to handle situations like Libya...something far more likely than another Special Ops Olympics like Afghanistan.

Read the entire article but the Nation already has Rangers.  If we need to conduct raids they're the go to guys.  If we need to train indigenous personnel then we have the Special Forces...if used properly they can prevent wider wars (think the mess in Syria) by training rebels.  Quite honestly the SEALs, MARSOC and Air Force Special Ops are the units that have ill defined roles.  I guess you could say that SEALs are Maritime specialist, but MARSOC and Air Force Special Ops?  I just don't know.

And that leads me to my last point.  We don't need more Special Ops and SOCOM is probably too large.  What happens when policy evolves to more than just raids, raids, raids?

The nation doesn't need another Ranger Battalion...doesn't need a super large Special Ops Support Unit.  What it needs is a robust Marine Corps focused on mission, not on social issues or political correctness. One other thing.  We can't be scared of the debate.  Whether you agree with the article or with me, its a discussion that must be had.

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

The LHA with F-35B's. The new capital ship.


A question asked by a reader.

Why would Singapore pick the F-35B over the A or C model?

Simple.  Because Singapore wants to be a regional power...and that means a strong Navy.  That means F-35B's operating off the new capital ships of most fleets.  An LHA/LHD type ship.

Singapore, Japan, Korea, Australia and China are all building or have LHA's in service.  The only Pacific navy that has carriers are the USA and China.

If you're a medium power and want to punch above your weight then its obvious that most naval strategist have determined that the LHA with F-35B's on deck deliver that punch.

Notice too that I said "with".  Without the F-35B then all an LHA becomes is an assault transport at best....or maybe a supreme anti-sub, disaster relief...but it cannot fulfill the role of light carrier.  With the F-35B's stealth light carrier might not be appropriate (time to bring back the term ATTACK CARRIER!)

Perhaps naval terminology needs to change to reflect evolving technology.  Either way this will affect the buys from Japan and S. Korea.  Once Singapore demonstrates a naval fighter/strike fighter you can bet the others will not want to fall behind.

One sale and the F-35's future got much brighter.

Its official. The Brits ARE crazy. Slo-Mo deer headshots.



Why headshots?  You can't mount your trophy if you blow it apart like that!  The Brits are crazy!

Singapore to announce buy of F-35B.


I told ya that the F-35B would be the best seller of the models on the foreign market.  via AOL.
Singapore is expected to announce sometime in the next 10 days that it plans to buy its first squadron --12 planes -- of some 75 of Lockheed Martin's F-35Bs, further bolstering what had been the flagging fortunes of the world's most expensive conventional weapon system.
You want the truth about the F-35?

China is saving the program.

If China had been more strategic about displaying its new stealth jets...if they had been more reasonable when it came to flexing its muscles against smaller nations...if they had been willing to negotiate over island claims then everyone would be willing to concentrate on other things and let their armed forces wither.

Instead they've started an arms race.

SIDENOTE:  A few more buys of the "B" model and you'll see a flip that few saw coming.  By virtue of numbers alone the "B" will become less expensive than the "C".  Everyone is always pointing to the "B" model for cancellation but if the US Navy is the only buyer of that model and they're willing to wait then maybe a reconsideration should be made....Fewer carriers will mean that the Marines can skip the need to fill carrier aviation slots so no need to buy the "C" model either.   

The RAF has been insufferable with this...



The RAF Infantry has been insufferable with the publicity seeking over the airfield defense role.

Lets be honest.

There was a catastrophic failure a short time ago and then as well as now they continue to thump on their chest about "the job they do".....Quite honestly its not at all the British way and I'm disappointed.  Reading RAF press releases they repulsed the attack, they took the fight to the insurgents and nothing was lost.

Not what I remember reading.

Monday, March 25, 2013

Marine News.


Thanks for the heads up Lee.

OK guys, this is really deserving of a rant but I'm still punching walls so I'll try and keep it to a low roar...via Inside Defense.
Special-Purpose MAGTF To Have 500 Marines, Rely On MV-22, KC-130J
The Marine Corps' new special-purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force crisis-response team will be about one-sixth the size of a traditional MAGTF but will allow the service to place more units in places like Africa to provide the range and speed needed to respond to crises, a Marine Corps official said last week
Brig. Gen. Matthew Glavy, assistant deputy commandant for aviation, told Inside the Navy on March 20 that the special-purpose MAGTF would have about 500 Marines versus about 3,200 in a traditional MAGTF but would still be a "very capable" crisis response force.
"When you can't sortie the ships required to have an enduring presence, how do you get the same effects to the combatant commander?" he told ITN after giving a presentation at an amphibious operations symposium hosted by the Defense Strategies Institute. "The V-22 [Osprey tiltrotor aircraft] provides the depth and range, combined with the KC-130J air refueling capability, combine that with a company of Marines, and you're kind of onto something."
And...
USMC Looks To Existing Technologies For Amphibious Combat Vehicle
The Marine Corps is focusing on leveraging existing technologies to define requirements for the Amphibious Combat Vehicle through an ongoing feasibility study, according to a service official.
The study will help the service better understand the risks and best approach for developing an affordable, survivable, high water speed vehicle, John Burrow, ACV director, told Inside the NavyMarch 19 during an interview at Marine Corps Base Quantico, VA.
"This vehicle will be in the Marine Corps serving the nation for a long time, so we've got to get it right," he said.
The study, which just began, will last about six months, but Burrow does not see it significantly impacting the program's time line because of its nature. . . ."Some of the concept design work we're going to be exploring will help to mitigate, I think, the time line, number one. And number two, because we're leveraging some of the existing technology, then we can minimize some of the development time associated with that," he said.
First.  On the Special MAGTF.  I despise duplication of effort.  I don't like it when a new wheel is invented when a tried and true one will get the job done.

MEU's could handle those situations that this new MAGTF is being designed for.  Instead, we're about to stand up a new formation.  If an MEU isn't in range then what about Rangers, SEALs, MARSOC or hell even the 82nd?  If the issue is really AFRICOM and having a force that can rapidly deploy throughout that continent then why aren't we looking at a joint solution?  I just don't see this as a wise use of limited resources.

On the Amphibious Combat Vehicle...did I just read that it is again going to be delayed?  I am speechless.

Just a refresher.  This is what the Commandant said...
“There are two answers to that, one is as Commandant of the Marine Corps’s answer which is Before I leave leave office four years from now … we’ll have a program of record, we’ll have steel, there will be a vehicle and I’ll be able to drive it,” Amos said
and....
“I’m trying to pressurize industry, I’m trying to pressurize the acquisition folks, I want the word to get out. If we followed the standard acquisition timeline, which in some cases got us to where we are today, it’ll be 2024.”
and...
“Something probably that resembles the sense of urgency that we had for the MRAP but probably a little bit more scheduled, and that’s what we’re going to do.”
Mark my words.  The US Army will have the GCV and the AMPV in service before a Marine drives the ACV.

DHS buys even MORE ammo?


Thanks Mike for the link.

Ok gents.  I don't care.  Call me a tinfoil hatter but this is getting crazy.  Now it appears that they are purposefully causing confusion and consternation.

DHS is buying even more ammo according to this solicitation.

:
Added: Mar 21, 2013 4:48 pmThis is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice.The solicitation number is HSFLAR-13-Q-00020 and is issued as an invitation for bids (IFB), unless otherwise indicated herein.The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular FAC 2005-65. The associated North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code for this procurement is 332993 with a small business size standard of 1,500.00 employees.This requirement is a [ Small Business ] set-aside and only qualified offerors may submit bids.The solicitation pricing on www.FedBid.com will start on the date this solicitation is posted and will end on 2013-03-28 17:00:00.0 Eastern Time or as otherwise displayed at www.FedBid.com.FOB Destination shall be Artesia, NM 88210
The DHS Federal Law Enforcement Training Center requires the following items, Brand Name or Equal, to the following:
LI 001: Ammunition, Commercial leaded training ammo (CLTA) Pistol .40 caliber 165 grain, jacketed hollow point (JHP) p/n P40HSTS3G or equal - Brass casing. Quantity of 360,000 rounds - newly loaded unit price per 1000 rounds with FOB Destination., 360, CA; 
Read it all here.

This type solicitation, at this time in our nations history, during the current debates seems designed to produce some type of reaction from the citizenry.

I hope no one falls for the psy-ops and I hope this is just stupidity on the Feds part.

But they sure leave the impression that they're gearing up.

Just sayin.

Extended Area Protection and Survivability


Lockheed Martin Press Release.
Lockheed Martin’s [NYSE: LMT] Extended Area Protection and Survivability (EAPS) program successfully conducted the first Guided Test Flight to characterize the seeker, guidance, navigation and control systems of its Miniature Hit-to-Kill (MHTK) interceptor. The very small and agile interceptor is designed to defeat Rocket, Artillery and Mortar (RAM) targets at ranges greatly exceeding those of current systems.
The test was conducted on March 22 at White Sands Missile Range, N.M., in collaboration with the U.S. Army Research Development & Engineering Command/Aviation Missile Research Development & Engineering Center (RDECOM/AMRDEC). This test is another milestone in a series of technically challenging events completed under the EAPS Integrated Demonstration Science and Technology program.
The test closely replicated a tactical situation in which an enemy launches a mortar at an area protected by the MHTK intercept system. A radar successfully detected and tracked the threat in flight. The tactically configured MHTK interceptor launched vertically and flew a trajectory positioning it to detect energy from a ground illuminator reflected off the mortar target. Responding to the reflected energy, the MHTK interceptor maneuvered to fly very close to the target and gather data through its seeker as it passed the mortar in flight. Intercepting the target was not an objective of this flight test.
In addition to gathering data to characterize the interceptor’s performance, this test integrated and exercised the entire intercept system for the first time. The data collected will support an intercept flight test planned for later this year.
Hopefully this works and gets into service.  Quite honestly they had me sold when they showed the possibility of taking down 155mm cannon fire or MLRS.

But does it have any naval applications?  Regardless, more info is here.

NY State SWAT.


I'm sure you've seen the pic of the SWAT guy in NY with his EOTECH attached backwards on his rifle.

I was gonna let this one go but its just too perfect.

These are the guys that MARSOC, SEALs, Rangers (I don't hear much about Special Forces working with local law enforcement) all go to big cities to work with.

These are the same Cops that have begun calling themselves "operators"....its just too rich, too juicy, too laugh out loud funny to not post it here.

A nice little chuckle to get the day started.

The UK is a strange place.

Have you ever heard of the "bedroom tax"?

Me either but it seems to be causing trouble for people across the pond.  I don't quite get the "what" and "whys" behind the issue but after reading an article here  it seems like people are really and truly pissed off.  I love it.

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Required F-35 reading.

In order to fully appreciate the tremendous leap ahead in capabilities that the F-35 will bring its essential to understand the origins of the program.

Two websites give the best overview.  JSF.mil and Aerospace Website.

On JSF, its recommended that you take a few minutes and read the ENTIRE history of the program...including pre-JAST info.  On Aerospace, I suggest you look at all galleries and examine the different concepts that were proposed for each program.  I can't imagine the frustration for designers to work on designs only to see them scrapped and a new program started.

One thing can't be denied.  Work has been going on since the 1990's to replace the F-16, F-18, A-10 and Harrier.

Advanced Short Take-Off/Vertical Landing (ASTOVL) 1983-1994
Advanced Tactical Aircraft (ATA) 1983-1991
Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) 1994-1996
Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) 1994-1996
Advanced/Fighter-Attack (A/F-X) 1992-1993
Multi-Role Fighter (MRF) 1990-1993
Multi-Role Fighter (MRF) 1990-1993

Gun guys have a kind of madness.


via The Truth About Guns from Yahoo News.

Apparently, there will be no ban on assault weapons.
Never mind that Adam Lanza used a Bushmaster AR-15 assault-type rifle to rip apart the bodies of children at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. Forget the fact that James E. Holmes, the alleged Aurora, Colo., movie theater shooter, fired, among other weapons, an AR-15.
Nor does it seem to make any difference that Jared Loughner -- the man who shot Gabby Giffords and killed six others, including a 9-year-old girl -- used a high-capacity magazine that the Clinton-era assault-weapons ban rendered illegal. A high-capacity magazine also enabled the massacre committed by Seung-Hui Cho, who killed 32 people at Virginia Tech.
The political climate has changed since the 1994 ban: Democrats have cowered before the gun lobby; the National Rifle Association has grown even more extreme; the U.S. Supreme Court has moved much further to the right. And, in the 20 years since Congress banned assault-type weapons and high-capacity magazines, Americans have heard a steady drumbeat of pro-firearms rhetoric that fetishizes the Second Amendment. In other words, the climate around firearms has gotten crazier.
Even before the current debate over more restrictive gun laws began, most political observers knew it would be difficult to get Congress to stand up to the firearms lobby. So it's no great surprise that Majority Leader Harry Reid, who runs from the shadow of the National Rifle Association, slammed the door on Sen. Dianne Feinstein's effort to re-up the assault-weapons ban.
Still, I find myself once again wondering just how bad things have to get before the fever breaks -- before the country comes to its senses on firearms. We're in the throes of a kind of madness, a mass delusion that assigns to firearms the significance of religious totems.
I rarely enjoy reading opinion pieces left leaning opinion pieces. But this one had me giggling like a school girl.

I read it, laughed, read it again and still can't get the smile off my face.

I don't know what conclusion you'll come to once you've read this but I find the fear, the amazement that many don't agree with her opinion and the conclusion that anyone who disagrees must by overcome with a kind of "madness" somewhat pleasing.

What she fails to realize is that 99.9% of the gun guys just want to be able to enjoy the shooting sports, protect their families and not have government infringe on their rights.

Meanwhile, Congress keeps burning up the clock angering gun guys and putting their own members from conservative states between a rock and a hard place.  As much as I want this controversy over with.  As much as I want a settlement of this issue so that gun and ammo prices can go back to normal.  I'll gladly put up with the nonsense.  The longer this is brewing the less time the Congress has to devote to other parts of the agenda.

A submersible AAV?

If nothing else its interesting...




101st patrolling a hilltop.

KHOWST PROVINCE, Afghanistan " Soldiers assigned to Blue Platoon, Troop B, 1st Squadron, 33rd Cavalry Regiment, 3rd Brigade Combat Team "Rakkasans," 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), conduct a dismounted patrol through the mountainous terrain in the Musa Khel District, Afghanistan, March 6, 2013. Soldiers conducted a 12-mile dismounted patrol in order to reach a village in the valley in hopes to disrupt suspected insurgent activity. (U.S. Army Photo by Spc. Brian Smith-Dutton TF 3/101 Public Affairs)

SMSS will help Women get into the Infantry.



The one undeniable fact that has prevented Women from serving in the Infantry is the issue of strength.  Biologically Women are not as strong as Men.  You can find examples of where this isn't true but as a rule its just simply the way things are.

So how do you defeat biology in a physically demanding field?  You do it with technology.  And the long in development Squad Mission Support System is just the thing to help push open a door that has remained closed.

Even with this system (and others like it) the physicality required will be difficult to overcome and I truly believe that it will cripple some Women (its done it to Guys).  But we'll see. Now glance at the pic below and imagine a 130 pound female cross fit athlete dealing with that load.  Gym strength and military strength are two different things.



CAESAR Artilley in action (Mali)




Marine MPC vs. Army AMPV


via AOL Defense.
Last night, the Michigan-based Tank-Automotive Command (TACOM) issued a draft Request For Proposals for a new Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle. The final RFP is expected in June and the contract award in mid-2014. Variants of the General DynamicsStryker and the BAE Bradley are the leading contenders. Our industry sources are still poring over thousands of pages of documentation, but here are the highlights.
The Army needs a big pat on the back and a hearty "way to go" with how they've handled their vehicle programs.

Not only did they push through the Stryker as a Interim Combat Vehicle (supposedly a lead in to the FCS) but they've been up and at'em when it comes to replacing both the Bradley AND the M-113.

Marine YAT-YAS boys and Grunts should take note.  While we're still waiting for the Marine Personnel Carrier and the Amphibious Combat Vehicle, the US Army could well have both the AMPV and GCV in production.

The time has come to do something drastic for Marine armor.  We need to take a page from the War on Terror playbook and do an Urgent Operational Requirement for the MPC.

SIDENOTE:  I'm not buying that there is no money.  Sequestration seems to be a joke.  Did you notice how much money the President pledged in foreign aid on his trip to the Middle East?  Bring a portion home to buy Marines a new vehicle.  

Weird idea of the week. Tracks on wheeled armored vehicles...


Just a thought and it might be impractical but if we can put tracks on our recreation, personal, and emergency vehicles to help them gain mobility in muck---whether snow or mud---then why can't that same tech be applied to vehicles like the Stryker or the upcoming Marine Personnel Carrier?

Its sorta underground but well known to off road enthusiast that these tracks, while a bit expensive, hold up well and can make a vehicle like a Jeep into a an all terrain monster.

Wanna put DARPA dollars to work on something that could help solve problems short term?  Have them work on this.