In an attempt to determine when we all received solid, concrete information that this program was in a tailspin, I looked up quotes from program officials that would tell us when the alarm bells rang for all to hear.
Let me add that these are the public statements.
Internally alarms should have been ringing possibly years earlier.
I want them both to start behaving like they want to be around for 40 years,” Bogdan told reporters during a visit to Australia. “I want them to take on some of the risk of this program, I want them to invest in cost reductions, I want them to do the things that will build a better relationship. I’m not getting all that love yet.”
“Its an unaffordable program at the numbers that we’re using,” Lieutenant General Terry Robling told Reuters earlier this month.
What I see Lockheed Martin and Pratt & Whitney doing today is behaving as if they are getting ready to sell me the very last F-35 and the very last engine and are trying to squeeze every nickel out of that last F-35 and that last engine,” Bogdan said, who was speaking to reporters at the Australian International Airshow.
So yeah.
Those are alarm bells that we were given. But what about recently? Check out this carefully parsed statement by Admiral Greenert.
“Speaking for the Navy,” added the Chief of Naval Operations, Adm. Jonathan Greenert, “I need the fifth-generation fighter, and that [F-35] provides it, so we’re all in — but it has to perform. It has problems; it is making progress.”
“I do not at this point believe that it is time to look for an exit ramp, if you will, for the Navy for the F-35C,” continued Greenert, who in the past has damned the Joint Strike Fighter with similar faint praise.
Yeah. I missed Admiral Greenert well phrased statement earlier too.
"It has to perform..."
"I do not at this point believe that this is time to look for an exit ramp...."
That sounds like a guy that will bail if the tail hook isn't fixed and costs continue to rise. But what should concern the planes biggest supporters and why they should be all over ANOTHER RESTRUCTURING of the program is the code issue.
I'm moving toward the cancelation, not the delay camp because I'm beyond frustrated with so much of the budget being tied up in one aviation program. The pentagon would be wise to do a top to bottom review now...before signing a new production contract to see exactly where the program is and when it will be able to deliver a fully functioning airplane.
UPDATE:
How jacked up is this program and how fouled up is LM and PW? via Defense News....
“There’s no doubt a large amount of our classified data probably made it into” the designs for the J-20, a Chinese plane modeled on the F-22, and the J-31, a JSF equivalent, according to Lt. Gen. Charles Davis, USAF military deputy for acquisition, who appeared with Bogdan at the hearing.
Both planes were developed in the span of about 22 months, according to Davis, which shows China has achieved a level of acquisition ability that could be potentially dangerous to U.S. interests.
Senators asked the panel, which included Davis, Bogdan and Vice Adm. W. Mark Skinner, whether China has faced any repercussions over the apparent theft of data.
“If they’re going to go ahead and copy what we got, they at least have to pay a little bit for it,” Manchin said. “Has their government been put to the task? It’s very obvious what they have done. ... Have we prosecuted anybody? Are we on the tail of anybody?”
The panel gave noncommittal answers to Manchin’s question, but Bogdan expressed confidence in the Pentagon’s ability to protect key information.
“In the last few years we have implemented some fairly robust procedures to keep F-35 data within the confines of the department,” he said, adding that the partner nations are also doing a good job protecting information.
But, “I am a little less confident about our industry partners, to be quite honest with you,” Bogdan said. “I am not that confident outside the department.”
While he did not elaborate, both Lockheed Martin and Pratt & Whitney insist their cybersecurity is potent enough to protect sensitive information.
So they're late, leak like a sieve and want even more money from the DoD. It must be understood that servicemen serve the state and contractors serve shareholders. Don't be confused by the fact that these are "defense" companies. They're profit driven monsters just like Facebook or Google.