T-90S Main Battle Tank being demonstrated in Peru.

via Press Release.

On September 19 a firing range in Peru saw demonstration of the T-90C tank of the Uralvagonzavod produce for Gen. Ricardo Moncada Novoa, Commander-in-Chief Land Forces and 300 officers.
The command authorities of the South American republic were shown the T-90C tank combat and running capabilities by day and at night as well as accuracy of fire with all types of weapons at different ranges from a halt and on the move under conditions of limited visibility and mountainous terrain.
The combat vehicle crew completed all missions successfully having demonstrated high potential of the Russian tank manufactured by Uralvagonzavod.
After the major demonstration one of the Peruvian drivers of the T-55s being in service with the Peruvian Army was offered to “take a drive” of the T-90C tank. After a 5-min briefing, he made a run showing a good skill level and brought the tank to a halt by the Commander-in-Chief. The experiment is a proof that the advanced T-90C tank is as resoponsive and simple as its predecessor T-55 produced by Uralvagonzavod 40 years ago.
Senior officers of the Peruvian Army appreciated the T-90C tank capabilities and the skill of the tank crew members.

The Peruvian Military is running an unusual competition.  They've disqualified Spanish 2A4 Leopards,  Dutch 2E6 Leopards, Ukrainian T-64E and T-84...mainly due to cost and logistic considerations.  BUT!  US M1A1 Abrams and Russian T-90 and T-80 are still being considered.

I know the Spaniards and Dutch would practically give away the tanks...and I don't understand how the M1A1 is considered to be logistically more palatable than Ukrainian tanks.

Very interesting.  

BMPT Tank Support Fighting Vehicle

Obrum - PL-01 Stealth Main Battle Tank Concept Simulation

Thanks Dwi!!!

Ship to shore logistics.

Think Defence has a write up on US ship to shore logistics that's worth a read.  Its in the finest of European articles on defense issues...long, quite detailed, yet thought provoking nonetheless.

What I find fascinating is that he links extensive offshore logistics to the sea base and amphibious assaults instead of seeing it as a natural extension of a military that has and will probably fight future wars far from home.

Its about keeping large numbers of US troops well supplied in far off lands...not amphibious assault.

Read it here.

OV-10G+ Bronco testing ends.

OV-10G+ testing ends this month (don't know how I missed it).  Read about it here.

Warning! Extremely Graphic! Sniper in Syria kills 2 Rebels with one shot.

338 or 50 cal.  One second you're the hunter.  The next you're the prey.

Note:  Thanks to JR for the new link after YouTube pulled the first vid...

Note 1:  If you die first we're dividing your stuff.

Isn't it past time to boycott anti gun states?

I was watching the above video and it dawned on me.

Zulu Nylon is made in the US!  Good!  But in Illinois.  Bad!

So I wonder out loud here.  Is it time to boycott guns and gear made in anti gun states?  I mean a hardcore, Smith and Wesson back in the day boycott.  Not because the manufacturer did anything wrong but because we're supporting anti gun Senators that will vote against our rights by supporting the state economy that keeps electing them.

I think we should.  The problem is simple though.  We'll end up tagging alot of guns and gear that have been our friends for a greater good.  It'll hurt us and them but pain is weakness leaving the body so its pain we should embrace.

Agree?

China demonstrates reach...

via Chinese Military Review.

How not to plant a roadside bomb. via Marine Corps Aviation Association.

Chinese Mechanized Infantry Brigade vs. US Army Stryker Brigade.

We've all been talking about the rise of China but its been mostly in the context of their air or sea power.  That's a luxury the Think Tanks that are trying to lay the groundwork for Air/Sea Battle can enjoy....Not professional Soldiers or Marines.

The first thing that should be done is a comparison of equipment on a 1 for 1 basis.  This is a first attempt to do just that.

Infantry Carriers.

ZBD -09 8x8 Armored Infantry Fighting Vehicle.  The quick and dirty rundown?  It has a 30mm cannon, a coax 7.62 and can be fitted with a 12.7mm cannon for use by the vehicle commander.  It carries a crew of 3 and 7 infantrymen.
vs.

Stryker Infantry Carrier Vehicle.  Quick and dirty?  12.7mm machinegun on a RWS mount with a crew of 2 and 9 dismounts.

Advantage?  Slight nod to the Chinese vehicle.  The 30mm cannon was the deciding factor.  .  You can't ignore the extra Infantrymen that the Stryker carries.  You also can't ignore the massive fire support that the 30mm cannon of the Chinese vehicle either.

Mobile Gun Systems.

Information is spotty when I tried my Google-foo.  In a way that makes it more dangerous, not less.  Its an unknown quantity.
vs.

The Mobile Gun System IS a known quantity.  Its underpowered, it sports an unusual for western armies 105mm cannon and it features an automatic loader.  Its very unreliable and we'll all know the Army is serious about its Stryker Brigades when it goes for a manned turret like the CV-90/120T sports.

Advantage?  China.  I am NOT a fan of what the Army did with this weapon system and hopefully they'll improve it.  Until then they're at BEST looking at a slight loss. Future combat might indicate that I was being extremely generous.

Artillery

Combat proven, light weight, air mobile and hard hitting.  Extremely long ranged when coupled with the right shells but vulnerable to counter battery fire.
vs.

In this configuration its shorter ranged than the US system but makes up for it by being mechanized.

Advantage?  China.  Mechanized artillery is a major advantage that the Chinese would have in a force on force encounter.  How the US Army failed to provide for this shortcoming in Stryker Brigades is beyond me but its a glaring mistake.  It probably has more to do with operations in Afghanistan than anything else, and I'll notch this oversight as another scalp that the COIN Mafia can claim...but it need to be fixed.

Anti-Air Systems.

Advantage?  Huge plus for China.  I don't even know of a system in development for US forces.  The USAF will keep enemies at bay?  That's your daddy's USAF.  The new guys will leave you hanging.  If the US Army isn't prepared to deal with the reality that support will be MUCH less than they've enjoyed in the past then they aren't paying attention.  Meanwhile China is working on something to kill drones AND keep Apaches from killing everything in sight.  It seems they studied the Deep Strike that Apaches attempted in Iraq.

Summation.  US ARMY LOSES.  As things stand right now, it looks like a Stryker Brigade could be facing a mismatch when up against a Chinese Mech unit.  The years of fighting a COIN war have really taken a toll.  In a perfect world I'd like to see the Stryker Brigade bite the bullet and integrate at least a company or two of Tanks...see some type of mobile air defense added and definitely a Stryker based artillery system added.

Blast from the past. Landkreuzer P. 1000 "Ratte" Tank

Sheer craziness.  Mixed with a little weirdness.  Shaken with a whole lotta cool.  Impractical, but cool.  Stats via Wikipedia.

Specifications
Weight	1,000 tonnes (1,100 short tons; 980 long tons)
Length	35 m (115 ft) hull 39 m (128 ft) guns forwards
Width	14 m (46 ft)
Height	11 m (36 ft)
Crew	20+, possibly as many as 41
Armor	150–360 mm (5.9–14 in)
Main armament	2x 280 mm 54.5 SK C/34
Secondary armament	1x 128 mm KwK 44 L/55 8x 20 mm Flak38 2x 15 mm MG 151/15
Engine	8x Daimler-Benz MB501 20-cylinder marine diesel engines or 2x MAN V12Z32/44 24-cylinder marine diesel engines 16,000 to 17,000 hp (12,000 to 13,000 kW)
Ground clearance	2 m (79 in)
Operational range	~120 miles (190 km)
Speed	40 km/h (25 mph)

F-35. USAF kills A-10 to protect it, but at what price?

via POGO

The Air Force is so blinded by the allure of the multi-mission F-35 that it cannot, or will not, understand the nature of close air support (CAS) on today’s battlefield; how very close our young troops are to the enemy and the special equipment, controllers, and pilots it takes to perform CAS.
Until recently, without the knowledge of Congress, the Air Force was moving fast on a secret plan to help fund the F-35 by abolishing the A-10 fleet. Thanks to some closet patriots contacting the Hill, the cat is now out of the bag, but the damage has already been done.
A-10 training hours have been cut back and the last class of A-10 pilots is going through training. Three A-10 units have been deactivated or are in the process of being deactivated. Next year there will be no A-10 class at the Weapons School. Each step has increased the unit costs of the remaining A-10s and soon the fleet will be too expensive to keep. By the time Congress is aware of the plot, there will be no A-10s.
The plan to get rid of the A-10 has been on the desk of General Mark A. Welsh III, Air Force Chief of Staff. His decision will be one of the most important of his career, because this is not about losing an aircraft; it is about losing the CAS mission. There is no other aircraft in the Air Force inventory that can do what the A-10 does. The stories from the battlefield are countless. One will suffice.
In Afghanistan a Special Forces team attacked the compound of a Taliban leader. The Taliban reacted with heavy fire and the Air Force combat controller with the team was severely wounded. A Predator was overhead but could not get a shot. Nor could an F-16 which ran low on gas and departed. When two A-10s arrived, the gravely wounded controller called for them to make their gun runs “danger close.” The pilots fired high explosive cannon shells that impacted a mere 65 feet from the team. The A-10s broke up the attack and provided cover so the friendlies could leave the kill zone.
Every member survived. Every member returned to base. The combat controller, who had almost bled to death on the battlefield, survived and was awarded the Air Force Cross.
Few aircraft in history have so directly saved the lives of so many combat troops and civilians as has the A-10.
Pentagon insiders report that the Air Force fears the efficacy of the A-10 so much that today combat controllers are not allowed to call for the aircraft. Rather they are ordered to radio the results they desire and headquarters will dispatch the appropriate aircraft. Today when troops are in contact and the enemy is close, controllers call for an aircraft with two-hour loiter time and more than ten combat trigger pulls, attributes possessed only by the A-10.
The Air Force says the F-35 can perform CAS. That would mean using GPS coordinates and standing off at high altitude to fire missiles or drop bombs. No $160-million F-35 is going to get down in the weeds where a single bullet can take it out. A host of small arms fire hitting an A-10 can be fixed with what amounts to duct tape. No F-35 can maneuver under an 800-foot ceiling with two-mile visibility as can an A-10. No F-35 has more than three combat trigger pulls before running out of ammo. The A-10 has twenty. No F-35 has the battlefield survivability of the A-10.
But the Air Force has staked 60 per cent of its aircraft budget on the claimed multi-mission versatility of the F-35, and that is what General Welsh wants to protect.
By all accounts, General Welsh is a highly-respected leader and a fine man. But he has been on the job only a year and is facing so many issues, some strategic and immediate, that he has not had time to conduct due diligence regarding the A-10. If he allows the A-10 to wither away by the end of 2015, he will have broken faith with the young men and women on the ground in faraway places. He will have deceived Congress about the force structure of the Air Force. He will have violated his doctrinal obligation to protect America’s ground troops.
He will probably get his F-35. But he will have paid for it with the blood of brave young warriors.

The truth is rather stark.

For a small ulta high tech air arm, we're abandoning our people on the ground.  How much is the payout on SGLI?  I guess a squad of Soldiers or Marines is still cheaper than losing a F-35.  I imagine Rummy would be proud of the metrics done in that type of analysis. 

Ketchup on the wall via SuperHero Blog.

Sweep the Leg Drill

The Commandant finally gets a chance to crush a Marine in the urination case...

via Business Insider.

The court case concerning the video of six Marines urinating on Taliban corpses in Afghanistan has taken a bizarre turn toward the truly weird.First, the Commandant of the Marine Corps Gen. James Amos recently came under fire for allegedly exerting undue influence over the case and, for such, is reportedly under investigation.But then Hope Hodge of Marine Corps Times reported a true humdinger late Thursday when one Maj. James Weirick was relieved of his post "following allegations of harassment via email."
Weirick, staff judge advocate at Marine Corps Combat Development Command in Quantico, Va., sent emails to Amos' former defense attorney accusing Amos of misdeeds and advising his lawyer to "come clean" about them.
That's not the weird part though. Throughout the entire communication, Weirick refers to himself in the third person. From Marine Times:

“You are being offered the opportunity to unburden yourself. Weirick sleeps well every night knowing that honesty allows such freedom. You too can know this freedom. Just be honest,” Weirick wrote.
In the email, Weirick repeatedly refers to himself in the third person.
“Come to the side of the honest and truthful. Delay, obfuscation, and intimidation are not working. Those tactics will never work against Weirick,” he writes at one point. “Do whatever you want. Hunker down with the dishonest and hope for the best. Best of luck. You will need it.”

Hodge reports that Weirick ended with a threat: “He can’t offer you protection from Weirick. That protection can’t be offered by anyone. Ever," Weirick writes.
Aside from being relieved of command, Weirick has turned in his weapons and been asked to enter a voluntary psychiatric evaluation.

First.

I don't believe a press release coming out of the Commandant's Office.  He has proven that he will lie and spin to make himself look better.

Second.

I believe this Major is being railroaded.  This is the first time in my memory that I can remember the Military Justice System bucking an Officer of Amos' rank...of course we expect better behavior from those that sit in his chair but you get the point.  We can all applaud this Major's courage but he is paying the price for it.

This Commandant is a disgrace.  He has adopted the Administration habit of causing some type of crisis every few months to get attention off himself and onto a divisive issue.

Hopefully Amos will be investigated and relieved.  Hopefully.

UK ranked below Argentina militarily.

Oh this is gonna be fun.

Argentina is ranked ahead of the UK militarily.

If this ranking is to be believed then all my British friends that discount Argentine strength are gonna wake up one day with the Falklands reverting back to their former owner.

Read about it here.

Royal Navy buys an ice breaker...HMS Protecteur.

via Naval Today.

The vessel has been on a bareboat charter to the buyer since the spring of 2011. The sale provides GC Rieber Shipping with an accounting gain of about NOK 370 million (around USD 61Mln), while the cash effect is NOK 485 million (around 80 million USD).
“HMS Protector” (ex “Polarbjørn”) was purpose-built in 2001 for long expeditions to the Antarctic and for subsea assignments offshore. The UK MoD, a long standing client of GC Rieber Shipping, has been using the ship as an icebreaker and patrol vessel for the Royal Navy in the South Atlantic and the Antarctic since 2011.
It has also provided support for UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office and British Antarctic Survey. “HMS Protector” is the second vessel which MoD has chartered and later purchased from GC Rieber Shipping, the first one being “HMS Endurance”.

Irene Waage Basili, CEO of GC Rieber Shipping, comments: “We are very satisfied with the collaboration we have had with the MoD. They are highly professional and we have found them both challenging and rewarding to work with. We are known for having highly technical vessels and unique expertise for operations in icy waters and we see this transaction as an acknowledgement that a long-term customer is so satisfied that it wants to own our vessel. New investments in the ice segment are very interesting for us going forward.”

As part of the sale contract, GC Rieber Shipping will continue to support the vessel on a Contractor Logistic Support agreement for 1 year.

So....the Royal Navy isn't as broke as we were told.

And....

I wonder what info they have that is pushing them to buy an ice breaker?  Is something going on waaaay up North (or South) that I've missed? 

Russian version of TUSK

Thanks DWI for the link!

Women in the Infantry. That's what the "discipline" crackdown is all about.

About to take on new meaning in Infantry units....

Marine Corps Times is running an article talking about a new series of actions that the Commandant is ordering SUPPOSEDLY to get Marines back on the straight and narrow.

Read the article here.

I have not commented on it before, because I wanted to see what the reaction was from other Bloggers and Defense Writers.

Suffice it to say they don't know what they're talking about.

This is a preemptive strike, to sanitize the barracks for females to become part of Infantry units.

SNCO's and NCO's along with Officers making walkthroughs especially during the hours of 2000 and 0400?  No TVs or Video Games in duty rooms?  CAMERAS in the barracks areas?

They're practically yelling out that women in the infantry is GOING to cause problems.

Don't listen to their words.  Make note of their actions.  Surveys to male Marines, studies of the issue with regards to women in the Infantry, behind the scenes discussions with Commanders and exit interviews with Marines leaving the fleet tell the story.

They're scared beyond words that this will blow up in their faces.  It will too.  I can't wait to watch the cluster bomb explode.

NOTE:  Most of the reporting by the reporters covering the military missed the real issue for a couple of reasons.

*  They have knowledge of the military but no experience.  You can read any book you want, you can embed, you can talk to Soldiers or Marines everyday for a year and you'll never know the real story until you've actually lived it.
*  They are too quick to accept press releases put out by HQMC.  They assume that they're dealing with old skool Marines in the Commandant's office.  Amos is many things but he ain't that.  He'll bend over and suck down what ever liquid happens to be flowing from his civilians masters.
*  They assumed that barracks life is the same as college dorm life.  Having tasted both I can tell you its totally different.

Between personal bias leading them to believe the press release and HQMC, arrogance to think that "book knowledge" equals experience and the falsehood that college dorm experience equals military barracks life led them astray.

This is why military reporters fail so often.

Argentinian Propaganda...

Quite honestly I'm catching this while going out the door to get my workout on, but my history must be failing me cause I don't get the half slash through the Invincible.

Regardless, the issue with the Falklands still burns deep for the people of Argentina.    Something tells me that with some smart thinking by one of their Navy Admirals the Argentines could find a new benefactor that would trade goods for J-31's and long range anti-ship/anti-air missiles.

Now that would make things interesting.