via Marine Corps Times.
That's not true.
If I was as biased as many believe then I'd be shouting about these results. Instead I'm a little bummed. These female officers were put through a meat grinder when the outcome was predictable.
Its biology, not sociology.
What infuriates me is that while Amos is running these experiments, no one is thinking about the damage being done to the psychology of these women.
I'm sure they're outstanding people, winners in every sense of the word. But instead of being setup for continued success, the Marine Corps set them up for failure. A hard charging female officer is now doubting herself. The Marine Corps did those 4 women an injustice. There was no way they could succeed and everyone knew it going in.
NOTE: What will be the bigger shame is if they're babying the females at SOI-EAST. I'm told they are and that the instructors have been warned not to let any of the females fail. If thats the case then what does that tell us? I think its clear. The Marine Corps will lower its standards for the led but not its leaders? It really doesn't matter though. Boot Camp and SOI isn't where the wheat is separated from the chaff. Its in the fleet. Even if every female at SOI graduates they won't last a year in the fleet. Biology. Not sociology.
Four more women took on the Marine Corps Infantry Officer Course on Thursday and washed out, the latest chapter in the service’s ongoing research into which roles women should be able to fill in combat.Everyone wants to say that people are being sexist because they don't believe women belong in the infantry.
The women failed the school’s introductory Combat Endurance Test, a grueling exam designed to assess physical strength, stamina and the ability to make decisions while exhausted. They were recruited on a voluntary basis to attempt IOC at Quantico, Va.
All told, 81 male and female Marines began the initial endurance test yesterday at Quantico. Sixty-five men passed; 12 male Marines and four female Marines did not, said Capt. Maureen Krebs, a Marine spokeswoman at the Pentagon.
That's not true.
If I was as biased as many believe then I'd be shouting about these results. Instead I'm a little bummed. These female officers were put through a meat grinder when the outcome was predictable.
Its biology, not sociology.
What infuriates me is that while Amos is running these experiments, no one is thinking about the damage being done to the psychology of these women.
I'm sure they're outstanding people, winners in every sense of the word. But instead of being setup for continued success, the Marine Corps set them up for failure. A hard charging female officer is now doubting herself. The Marine Corps did those 4 women an injustice. There was no way they could succeed and everyone knew it going in.
NOTE: What will be the bigger shame is if they're babying the females at SOI-EAST. I'm told they are and that the instructors have been warned not to let any of the females fail. If thats the case then what does that tell us? I think its clear. The Marine Corps will lower its standards for the led but not its leaders? It really doesn't matter though. Boot Camp and SOI isn't where the wheat is separated from the chaff. Its in the fleet. Even if every female at SOI graduates they won't last a year in the fleet. Biology. Not sociology.