Tuesday, December 24, 2013

NSFW!!!! DSHK headshot gif via TacBlog.



Description from TacBlog.
This ladies and gentlemen is our enemy. They cannot be reasoned with, negotiated with, or be coexisted with. They do not want to live in peace with you or your family or our country. They want you, your family, our country, and anyone that’s not a Wahhabi to die in the most painful way possible.
They understand one thing and one thing only. FORCE and STRENGTH.

Monday, December 23, 2013

Mikhail Kalashnikov


I've been getting bombarded with the news that Mikhail Kalashnikov died today.  I'm not a bit torn.  I will not curse him but I will not mourn him either.

I've served and have had relatives that have served this nation since WW2.

The weapon he designed was aimed squarely at me and mine.

I know he made a switch to free market capitalism and gained fame in the gun community but I don't forget that easily.  Just like many ignore the fact that China is a communist nation that subjugates its people, yet have no problem in buying goods or trading with that country, many forget that Mikhail designed a weapon that directly affected them or their loved ones.

I won't forget that and neither should you.

The fight continues for the CRH-60...


The fight for the CRH continues and it looks like Sikorsky is now actively running with the ball.

Quite honestly this raises two questions for me.  Is the support that we're seeing from retired Airmen real or is it astroturf.  We've seen such efforts before with the F-35 and the EFV and I'm wondering if we're seeing it here.

Second.  I have sent e-mails but they aren't answering.  Why did Sikorsky go forward with new build H-60's instead of the larger and roomier S-92's?  That is the one helicopter that I really expected to take off in military circles but it just hasn't (its been extremely successful in the civilian market).  The S-92 looks like a better fit for the CRH mission but Sikorsky didn't offer it.  Why?


USMC Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force Crisis Response (SPMAGTF-CR) finally gets a real test.

Note this chart is somewhat dated but gives an indication of manning and missions.

via FoxNews.
Defense officials say the U.S. is moving additional Marines and aircraft from Spain to the Horn of Africa to provide embassy security and help with evacuations from violence-wracked South Sudan.
Army Col. Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman, says the commander in Africa is getting the forces ready for any request that may come from the U.S. State Department.
A defense official says the extra forces moving to Djibouti will bring the total U.S. troops there to 150, with 10 aircraft, including Osprey helicopters and C-130 transport planes. The official was not authorized to speak publicly so spoke on condition of anonymity.
Troops deployed last week helped evacuate Americans and other foreign nationals and provided security at the U.S. Embassy in Juba. Another couple hundred Americans remain in the country.
Read it all here.

First.  Let me be clear.  We shouldn't be doing this and it will end badly.  For an administration that declared that they wouldn't be engaging in the "wrong" wars this is remarkably short sighted.  Quite honestly it reminds me of Bush and Somalia.  We're doing it for all the right reasons but that means little in the world we live in.  Marines will die, civilians will be slaughtered and on the ground the status quo will remain.

Second.  This is going to be the first real test of Amos' SPMAGTF-CR.  The idea of sending Marines into combat without the full power of at least a MEU supporting them chills me to the bones.  This is not how we fight.  Putting our forces at the mercy of deliveries, resupply and evacuation by MV-22s and the wing (though they will act bravely) is not something we need to be doing.   Sending an enhanced Infantry Company into the mess that is Africa is unsettling disturbing.

Last.  Despite my misgivings I hope this works.  This is definitely one time that I don't want to be proven right.  State, the DoD and the Marine Corps is once again sending young Marines into a hotspot at Christmas time.  Its a tradition but one that I'd love to see end.

F-35 Backup plan in full effect! Update and Clarification.


via USNI News.
The U.S Navy’s unmanned carrier launched airborne surveillance and strike (UCLASS) program has evolved to call for a jet that is much larger and much more capable than what was envisioned just six months ago, Navy officials told USNI News.


“We’re talking about a 70,000- to 80,000-pound airplane,” Rear Adm. Mike Manazir, the Navy’s director of air warfare said in a 20 December interview. “We’re talking [Grumman F-14] Tomcat size.”
The shift in the character of UCLASS comes as the service prepares to release a set of months-delayed draft requirements to industry, and follows a struggle inside the Pentagon over the character of the aircraft.
“The concepts have moved around. They’ve been: You want unmanned off the carrier to do some off-cycle ISR [intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance]—we’re more than that now,” Manazir said. “We have heavy-end ISR and strike capability with some growth in the ability to carry weapons and some growth in the sensor package.”
Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman and General Atomics are all hoping to secure what looks to one of the Defense Departments few new start development programs for the foreseeable future.
The Navy’s current thinking about the UCLASS concept calls for an aircraft much larger than even the 44,000-lb. Northrop Grumman X-47B unmanned combat air system-demonstrator (UCAS-D).
In fact, the UCLASS could be considerably larger than even the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, with some of the proposed UCLASS designs being 68 ft. long—eight feet longer than a Super Hornet, Manazir said.
Read the whole thing here.

Have no doubts though.  The USN is taking a far different road to protecting our nation than the other services.  THIS IS A BIG NAVY UAV!!!  It will be as big as the F-14, fully loaded F-35, and as big as the A-5 Vigilante.

Once the military community, Congress and others finally dial in to the gutting thats about to occur in US forces this myopic, "gotta have the F-35 at all costs" stupidity will end.

But even more importantly the Brits will want some.  So will others.  Cuts are coming and as predicted the F-35 death spiral is all but assured.

Merry Christmas to me!

UPDATE and CLARIFICATION:
Let me clear up something when I say the back up plan is in full effect.  My thinking goes like this.  Take the proposed upgrades to the Super Hornet, conformal fuel tanks to increase range, signature reduction efforts, improvements to the AIM-120...mix them with a large UAV capable of conducting both deep recon and strike missions and what do you get?  You get a Super Hornet that will be extremely capable until 2030 and probably a few years beyond.  You get a UAV that can go deep on the first day of war and provide not only strike but recon and damage assessment.  The question then becomes simple.  What do you need the F-35 to do?  How can you justify the added expense?  In my view you can't.  You're getting a cheap airplane that can do most of the work and then a cheap but capable extremely capable UAV to go where you wouldn't want to send a pilot anyway.  Its the Navy for a win...unless the Air Force and Marine Corps gets in the way.

Exercise Steel Knight 2014 vid by Cpl. Mike Wick

Sunday, December 22, 2013

CH-53K. Time to ask the difficult questions.


Its time to ask difficult question with regard to continued development of the CH-53K Heavy Lift Helicopter.  Before we get started let me state up front that I'm a fan of the current CH-53E and the concept for the CH-53K was a no brainer.

Before the Marine Corps sold its sold for the F-35B and the MV-22.

Now?  I have to ask out loud what does the CH-53K bring that can't be done with MH-60M's or even marinized CH-47's...both are much cheaper and in the case of the MH-60M would give added flexibility while conducting heliborne assaults.

The research and development money in the budget just passed by congress could get us our full buy of Marine Personnel Carriers today.  Not in ten years.  So I ask again.

Does continued development of the CH-53K make sense?

Active Shooter(s)!!! in a public location. Is off body carry the only real option?


EM Gear Blog has an article on what they call a "low profile" response kit to an active shooter situation.  What caught my attention was the reference to the Kenyan Mall Massacre.

We haven't had it yet but its going to happen if history is any indication.  Either a couple of thrill killers, a few insane buddies or terrorist will band together and go on a killing spree in a public place.

All this brings me to the question at hand.  How much ammo do you really need to carry with you to be considered prepared?  American Mercenary tells a story of two soldiers that ran through a basic load in a matter of minutes (you can read it here)....the juicy bits follow...
I recently came back from the sand box, and for the first time in a deployed environment my unit faced an "active shooter" scenario.
We lost one our own. Yes it sucked, but I learned something again, and being close to the action put things in perspective. I'm thankful that this time I didn't know the deceased on a very personal level. It is easier to compartmentalize and move on logically that way.
Two Soldiers with M9 pistols and full magazines, were able to save themselves from a pissed off Afghan with an AK long enough for someone else to shoot him with a rifle. Both the Soldiers went dry on ammo.

If you are going to carry a pistol, odds are it will save your life. Odds are statistically speaking, that it won't always kill the bad guy. If you want to make sure your pistol work kills the bad guy, you need to practice like Tam does so that you don't "suck."
I'm also trying to dig up an article from Police One where a LEO ended a car chase in a shootout from hell.

Luckily the guy was a paranoid, squared away son of a bitch.  He ended up exchanging gunfire with the bad guy and finally put him down.  Over 100 rounds were exchanged.  And before you get started, spare me the nonsense about it being a spray and pray situation.  You're by yourself, you're hookin and jabbin and you have to keep the bad guys head down while shooting and moving?????  He did good.  I'll keep trying to find the article, but the guy now carries North of 140 rounds with him now (I'm positive that includes 33 round mags in a go bag).

But back on task.  Is 15 rounds ready plus another 15 rounds in a spare mag enough for active SHOOTERS in this day and age?  Or is preparing for the lone robber or thief enough?  I don't know but I'm seriously beginning to wonder.  Maybe its time to rethink the taboo of offbody carry when it comes to being ready for active shooters.


China to build a 110,000 ton Aircraft Carrier. Where there is smoke....


via Herald Sun
Chinese website qianzhan.com cites "top People's Liberation Army" sources as saying the 110,000-ton aircraft carrier should be launched by 2020.
"By that time, China will be able to confront the most advanced US carrier-based fighter jets in high sea," the Chinese-language article reads.
The news follows rising tensions in the South and East China Seas where the most recent incident involved a near-collision with a US cruiser shadowing China's first aircraft carrier, the refurbished Liaoning which was purchased from Ukraine.
I don't know who's in charge of Chinese propaganda but they're good.  Just a few days ago a story came out about how they were railing against the Japanese defense buildup and now we hear about this.

But this isn't the first time we've heard that the Chinese are interested in building a super carrier to rival US ships.  Its a recurring theme...at least since I've started paying attention to them.  The arms race in the Pacific is now starting to catch the attention of the mainstream media, even as we continue to gut our own forces.  If the Chinese are bold, they can wait another two years and strike the last year of this Presidents term and reacquire Taiwan and steal the disputed islands.

The US military will be too weak to stop them (especially if we continue to bleed ourselves in Africa and the Middle East), our allies won't be strong enough by that time to stop them and the world will be ready to just let it be.

I'll never bet against the US and our allies but the Chinese...especially if they can maintain this momentum, are assembling a winning hand.

Peru buying 24 Mi-171Sh Terminator Assault helicopters

Thanks for the article Jonathan.



via DefenseNews.
WARSAW — The Peruvian Ministry of Defense has awarded an order for 24 Mi-171Sh helicopters to Russian defense export company Rosoboronexport. The contract is estimated to be worth US $500 million, according to the information obtained from a source close to the deal by local daily Kommersant.
The aircraft are scheduled to be delivered from 2014 to 2015, with the first batch of the helos expected to be supplied by Dec. 9, 2014. The new copters are to be used by the Peruvian armed forces in operations to counter drug trafficking and terrorism, the Russian newspaper reported.
The defense company will supply the helos along with a flight simulator and related equipment. Under the contract, a helicopter maintenance and repair center is also to be opened in Peru in early 2016.
In 2010, the Peruvian defense ministry ordered six Mi-171Sh copters and two Mi-35P helos from Russia. The aircraft were delivered by the end of 2011.
Based in Moscow, Russia, Rosoboronexport is a subsidiary of state owned defense giant Rostec, which comprises some 663 companies. The Mi-171Sh is manufactured by the Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant.
Not too surprising.  The Peruvian govt is a big time buyer of Russian military equipment.  What does surprise me...and to be honest annoys me more than a little is the fact that Sikorsky has the fabulous BattleHawk that the USN is all but putting into service and they're failing to advertise it.

Governments worldwide are wanting multi-role aircraft.  If you can have a transport that can also swing into the role of attack helicopter, or more precisely assault helicopter then you have a winner.  Why Sikorsky is leaving a potential worldwide winner on the bench is beyond me.  Especially when the basic design is viewed by the uniformed as being long in the tooth.



As a sidenote. Why can't they fit that 20mm under the fuselage of the MV-22? If it can fit under a UH-60 then it certainly should be able to be fitted to the MV-22 in the nose area.

Saturday, December 21, 2013

J-10 Air to Air Load Out via Chinese Military Review.




Breaking! US Military Aircraft Hit in S. Sudan!!!! UPDATE AND RANT!



via AP.
KAMPALA, Uganda (AP) — Rebel gunfire hit a U.S. military aircraft trying to evacuate American citizens caught in a remote region of South Sudan that on Saturday became a battle ground between the country's military and renegade troops, officials said. Four U.S. service members were wounded.
The U.S. military aircraft were heading to Bor, the capital of the state of Jonglei and scene of some of the nation's worst violence over the last week. One American service member was reported to be in critical condition.
The U.S. military's Africa Command said the hit aircraft was "participating in a mission to evacuate American citizens in Bor."
"After receiving fire from the ground while approaching the site, the aircraft diverted to an airfield outside the country and aborted the mission," the statement said. "The injured troops are being treated for their wounds."
Two officials told The Associated Press that after the aircraft took incoming fire, they turned around and flew to Kampala, Uganda. From there the service members were flown on to Nairobi, Kenya for medical treatment. The two officials are in East Africa and demanded anonymity to share information not made public.
The military statement did not identify the aircraft taking part in the mission. One official told AP it appeared the aircraft were Ospreys, the type of aircraft that can fly like a helicopter and a plane.
South Sudan's military spokesman, Col. Philip Aguer, said that government troops are not in control of Bor, so the attack on the U.S. aircraft has to be blamed on renegade soldiers, he said.
TRUST ME FRIENDS!

We do not want to become involved in a war in Africa.  It will make what has gone on in the Middle East look like the good ole days.

UPDATE:
I've been screaming that the V-22 is vulnerable in the approach and departure from landing zones.  I've been yelling that the terrorist have read our playbook and that they would setup to kill us the same way the old timers talk about the Viet Cong laying helo traps in Vietnam.  Early reports indicate that military leadership wasn't listening.

UPDATE 1:
Its been confirmed that these were CV-22s. I wonder what secret squirrel stuff they're doing.  You can bet that there is alot more to it than evacuating civilians.  Additionally I would love to know (but never will) if they have different landing profiles from the USMC version of the plane...or more precisely if they can maneuver more aggressively in the landing phase of things.

World of Tanks. From game to historical database.

AMX-48/50. My latest "isn't that cool vehicle" from World of Tanks.






I am still trying to grind with the World of Tanks but to be honest I suck donkey nuts.  A win rate of 47 percent puts me in the lower tier of players and a computer that is stock and not a gaming rig doesn't help.  Its enough to make me want to go outside and slaughter some wild pigs!

But I digress.  I'm really enjoying watching some of the other players show me how its done (Bohemian Eagle and Quicky Baby are my two favorites so far), but the main thing that keeps me stoked about the game is that its turning from game to historical database.  Want info on obscure armor?  More than likely you're going to be heading to a review on World of Tanks.  Gamers are obsessive and they take this game seriously, so everyone wants the tanks to represent the real thing as much as possible (where possible).  Additionally they want to KNOW about the real thing...why weren't they built?  How come it didn't perform better in real combat?  Those type question require digging into as much history as possible and that makes World of Tanks a pseudo-historical database.


India! Really! Seriously? I love ya but....


I've been following the story of the Indian Diplomat that was arrested for basically engaging in slave labor with her housekeeper.

I could see a formal protest from that country, but instead we have massive protests in the streets, accusations that our law enforcement engaged in gang rape in their treatment of her etc...

To which I say really?  Seriously?  India!  You can't be serious!

You have China which violates your border almost daily.  You have Pakistan that kills and beheads your soldiers along the Line Of Control on about a quarterly basis.....

And then you have us.  Americans.  Not perfect friends but the hand is out and this is your reaction?

I love ya India but if you're gonna be a world player then its time to grow up.

Update:  Keith requested links to some of the stories covering the protests.  I'm posting just a FEW below.  As an additional sidenote.  Let me add that this arrest was handled by the US Marshals Service.  Quite honestly I list them as being the top dogs when it comes to kicking in doors.  By that I mean professional.  No cowboys but they are hardcore.  This diplomat was handled by the book if they did the job...plus you have to know that the US District Attorney was breathing down their neck every step of the way.  There is no way in hell this woman was mistreated.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-25430792

http://nypost.com/2013/12/18/protests-continue-in-india-after-nannygate-diplomat-arrested/

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/indian-diplomat-devyani-khobragade-row-protesters-attack-dominos-pizza-outlet-in-mumbai/1209931/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/maid-arrested-indian-diplomat-great-stress-article-1.1554687

Friday, December 20, 2013

Did Nexter ask the question that the defense industry wants answered?

Thanks for the article Jonathan!


via GlobalPost.com
Nexter lamented the time and money it spent on the cancelled bid.
"Nexter has invested a great amount of time, energy and resources in the CCV program over the past four years," company executive Patrick Lier said in a news release.
"Millions of dollars have been spent because we believed the competition would be fair, open and provide a rigorous assessment of the candidate vehicles with a view to acquiring the best possible medium weight infantry fighting vehicle for Canada."
Nexter also said it wants the Canadian government to compensate it for the cost of its bid.
"It would be our expectation that the government would compensate industry bidders for the cost of their bids," he said.
"No company can afford to make such considerable investments only to have the process produce no result."
Read the entire article here, but its regarding the canceled Canadian Close Combat Vehicle Competition.

Time for a little truth telling.

When the Marine Corps finally nutted up and admitted that the Marine Personnel Carrier was going to be "delayed" I went ballistic.  But more importantly I expected the manufacturers to be pissed.  I wrote expecting some fire and brimstone but got nothing.  It was all diplomatic talk about how they looked forward to working with the Marine Corps on future politics.

Who would have thought that it would take some fucking Frenchmen to have the balls to say what needed to be said.

The USMC has been jerking industry around on the Amphibious Combat Vehicle, the Marine Personnel Carrier and the AAV Upgrade for the last 3 plus years.  It would be nice if industry got the balls to call them on it....they won't but it would be nice if they did.  Nexter did what the entire Defense Industry wants to do....hold government responsible for their part of the dysfunctional procurement process.

XA-180 slated for upgrade by Finland.


via UPI.
HELSINKI, Finland, Dec. 20 (UPI) -- Finnish defense manufacturer Patria reports it will overhaul and modernize XA-180 armored personnel carriers of the Finnish Defense Forces.The XA-180, known as the Pasi, is a six-wheel vehicle specifically designed for the country's military and has been in service since 1984. Estonia ordered the vehicle in 2005.
"Since the oldest of these vehicles dates back to the early 1980s, the total life-span of this successful Patria product is extremely long," said Seppo Seppala, president of Patria Land Systems and Patria Land Services. "As the original manufacturer of these vehicles, Patria has extensive in-depth know-how of armored wheeled vehicles. This enables us to produce a high quality-solution for the Defense Forces, in order to extend the life-span of the Pasi series.
"This is an extremely significant domestic defense project, a vital step for Patria in the development of the service business and a good reference for similar international projects in which we intend to be actively involved in the near future."
The contract involves the overhaul next year of a pre-series vehicle and a series of 70 vehicles in 2015-17. There is also an option to modernize 210 vehicles by the end of 2021.
The modifications will include new seats, electrical systems with instrument panels and new exterior surface coatings. Engines, power transmissions and axles will be inspected and repaired, or replaced if necessary, Patria said.
A cold wind is blowing in the armored vehicle industry.

Instead of purchasing new vehicles at what I imagine would be bargain prices, countries instead are opting to upgrade instead.  Bringing this back home, I wonder what the price for an upgraded AAV versus new MPC from BAE or Lockheed would cost.

We're entering a time where being penny wise and pound foolish might take on new meaning.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Close Combat Vehicle program is dead.


via Reuters.
Dec 19 (Reuters) - Canada, which has a history of recent military procurement mishaps, will scrap a C$2 billion ($1.9 billion) plan to buy armored vehicles for the land forces, the Canadian Broadcasting Corp said on Thursday.
The Conservative government announced in 2009 it would buy 108 so-called close combat vehicles designed to have enough protection to fend off the blast from mines and anti-armor weapons.
At the time Canadian forces were still active in Afghanistan. They stopped combat operations in 2011.
The three companies in the running were France's Nexter, Britain's BAE Systems Plc and General Dynamics Corp's Land Systems unit.
A spokeswoman for Defence Minister Rob Nicholson declined to comment on the report, saying military officials would make an announcement about the project in the near future.
Canada's Conservatives have experienced a series of procurement problems since taking power in 2006.
Last month, an official spending watchdog said Ottawa had underestimated how much a multibillion-dollar naval shipbuilding plan will cost.
In 2010, the government said it would buy 65 advanced F-35 jets from Lockheed-Martin Corp C$9 billion, but tore up the proposed deal in 2012 after the same watchdog said officials had deliberately downplayed the costs and risks.
Other problems include a plan to buy military trucks that was scrapped in July 2012 just minutes before the final deadline for applications.
I never really expected this program to survive.  The Canadian Army didn't seem enthused about it and quite honestly it was hard to justify.

The hits.  Keep. Coming. 

Typhoon shot down (metaphorically) in the UAE.

Thanks for the article David.


via BBC.
The Gulf state had been in talks with the company and the UK government to buy 60 Typhoon jets.
The union convenor at the firm's Warton factory in Lancashire said it was "very disappointing news to get before Christmas".
But a government spokesman said it was a "commercial decision" and that it was "always going to be a difficult deal".
"As BAE have said, it was an exciting prospect but not part of their business plan," they added.'Game changer'
In a statement BAE Systems said: "The UAE have advised that they have elected not to proceed with these proposals at this time."
A spokesman added that the collapse of the deal would not have an impact on jobs at the firm's Warton factory.
Phil Entwhistle, from the factory's Unite union branch, said the deal would have been a "game changer" in terms of recruitment and the long term future of the factory.
"Having said that, there's no threat to jobs in the short or medium term," he added.
"This deal wasn't yet part of the company's business plan so we won't be seeing people losing their jobs, certainly for the next three years or so."
Last year, BAE systems lost out on a deal to supply 126 Typhoon jets to India.
And the hits keep coming.

Rafale gets hit in Brazil and now the Typhoon gets shot down in the UAE.  What will be interesting is if the US played a bit of backroom dealing by pushing the F-35 to the UAE to steal the deal.

I'm just asking the question.  Don't hate me. 

If Air/Sea Battle was serious....

If Air/Sea Battle was a serious concept and actually sought to procure equipment to match the concept then what would the Pentagon be buying?  This is my take....


Frigates instead of LCS...
The USN says that its gearing up to "take back" the Pacific.  My words, but you get the idea.  The LCS is the wrong ship, for a time thats past, that never was a good idea in the first place.  Think about this.  The LCS was originally conceived as the answer to Iranian small boat swarms...but those swarms were really never that big a threat anyway.  One Cobra or armed SeaHawk could make mince meat of a swarm in minutes.  Once that became widely known the next thing was to fight pirates...but any ship could handle that task so the idea that we had to build an entire class to deal with that problem became apparent.  The latest excuse for the travesty that is the LCS?  Partnership missions.  Only know we find that our "partners" have better ships than the LCS will ever be.  So why does this pitiful ship continue?  Because leadership can't admit that they made a mistake.  We need "new" Oliver Perry's but instead get glorified speedboats.  If the Navy was serious about ASB then this would be fixed ricky tick quick.


F-23 instead of F-35...
If the USAF was actually serious about ASB they would be putting the F-23 into service with F-35 avionics like yesterday.  Distance.  The tyranny of distance.  I don't know but its always been said that the F-23 had better range and a much lower radar cross section than the F-22.  This should be simple because we'd be buying the shell and filling its guts with what should be off the shelf materials.  The USAF will never admit it but the F-22 is too short legged to be the difference maker we need in the Pacific theater.


FB-22 now instead of Next Gen Bomber later...
Under my plan we'd be taking in F-23's to fill the F-22 role and the F-22's would be modded to become FB-22's.  Everyone talks about high density/tech air defenses but they don't have a medium bomber on the agenda that can fight the battle at the edge of the battle space and then deeper.  That's the territory of the Strike Eagle, well its time to get a replacement for that particular role going now.  If they were serious they would be designing the bits to go inside the FB-22 now.


Marine Personnel Carrier now instead of Upgraded AAV...
If you're going to chop the Marine Corps down to a rumored 150,000 men then you better do your best to keep them alive.  I like the AAV, I think the AAV has served us well but its time for a replacement.  We have the BAE SuperAV ready to go now.  Buy it if you want to save some Marine lives.


X-47 becomes the joint attack airplane program...
If Congress had a brain they would stay in their lane.  Pushing for a joint fighter/attack airplane program was a step too far.  Manned aircraft operating in different mission profiles is just too hard.  But for a single mission profile?  Recon and attack?  Unmanned?  Yeah.  This is the one that Congress should have pushed for in a joint program.  The X-47 should be shoved down the throat of the Navy, Air Force, Marines AND Army.  Weaponize it to the gills, or set it up as a pure surveillance platform is up to the individual services but they will fly it.  A turn to the Pacific demands responsive support at the division level.  If the fleet air defense or deep strike mission is going on then the ground forces will have an unmanned air support platform that isn't perfect but still able to fly in a high threat area and drop ordnance where needed.


Next gen anti-ship missile development...
The Navy is working on this but they need to put it into overdrive.  Its beyond time to get this done.  The USN is almost unique in not having a credible, deadly antiship missile in its arsenal.  Time to reverse that.


Next Generation Ro/Ro Ship...
The USN has a great secret that hasn't been utilized...well its time to put all the cards on the table.  We need to start using the entire Army, not just the Stryker Brigades.  We don't need to be fancy in highlighting quick reaction if quick reaction doesn't have teeth.  Land a Stryker Brigade without proper support and you'll see them fight hard, hold ground but then get run over when attrition takes its toll.  Instead lets get the Marines, Airborne, Stryker and then a Heavy Brigade to the scene and win the battle and then the war.  We need to put our Heavy Brigades back into play by developing the next gen Ro/Ro ships.  And we need to do exercises NOW, utilizing current gen ships,  where we deploy Heavy Brigades to the Pacific to fall in with their gear.

This is my take on things if we were actually serious about Air Sea Battle.  Whats yours?

UPDATE:  One addition--Reforger for the Pacific (an idea by Paralus)
Paralus suggested a REFORGER for the Pacific and I heartily agree.  A yearly exercise that would have the US surge forces into the Pacific to test our rapid reaction capability would be welcomed by our allies and would put China on notice.  Click here to read a wiki article on the past exercises to Germany.

Ultra Hornet coming to a carrier near you?


via Aviation Week (the entire article is behind a paywall...).
As the U.S. Navy ponders future purchases of the F/A-18, it is showing growing interest in the comprehensive structures, systems and propulsion upgrade package proposed by industry earlier this year that would extend the combat life of the current fleet.
One element of Boeing's Advanced Super Hornet plan receiving close attention is large conformal fuel tanks (CFT). In flight tests, they have shown the potential for marginal drag reduction and other benefits over the unmodified aircraft, despite their size and capacity. With the ability to hold 3,500 lb. of fuel, the tanks could add 260-nm combat range to the Super Hornet and, in the case of the EA-18G Growler electronic-attack version, would extend time on station and bring-back weight.
I can't read the entire article...that pesky paywall...but even this blurb tells me something.

The USN is going to keep the Super Hornet in production by hook or crook.  Personally I'd love to hear the conversations about the SH and F-35 that are going on behind closed doors.  The public pronouncements and statements to the aviation press point to one thing.

The USN does NOT believe that the F-35 will work.

Boeing lost in Brazil but won the NAVAIR battle.