Sunday, February 02, 2014

Maritime Support Vessel....via Think Defence


Think Defense has an article on the Maritime Support Ship that just had a solicitation released on it.  Read it here, but what has my attention is how the Afloat Forward Staging Base and the MSV seem to be merging into the same ship.  Are we seeing the ground work being laid for more AFSB's? 

Sikh Army Captain.


Doesn't look as bad as I thought it would but I still don't approve.

When you start making exceptions for one, you're on the road to making exceptions for all.  What happens when someone decides that his membership in the Satanic Church should be as protected as everyone else therefore making his religious symbol (lets say its a witches hat) something that should be allowed under freedom of religion?

How do you say no?

How do you keep a uniformed service from becoming a motley crew of individual accoutrements and style decisions?

The US military has been a melting pot because it demanded that everyone who joined meet one undeniable, unaltering standard.  If you couldn't meet or chose not to meet that standard then you were either denied entry or dismissed for cause.

That meant that you had to set aside your own cultural beliefs/standards and adopt the military's way of doing things.

So many are worshipping at the altar of "being open minded" and "change" that they fail to see the danger/friction/chaos that they're inviting.

UPDATE:  Putting this out there before I'm hit with it.  I'm extremely impressed by the Sikh Warrior tradition.  So stow the "you're a racist" comments.

UPDATE 1:  I can't wait to see how the military deals with the next oppressed minority...transgendered people.


Saturday, February 01, 2014

UK to operate French VBCI's?

via lescehos.fr
It is left to be the surprise of the Franco-British summit on Friday, at least for the military aspect of the game: the French Army could pay twenty VBCIs, the latest infantry armored Nexter has its counterpart in the United Kingdom, according to our information.It would be for the troops of his gracious majesty to familiarize themselves with equipment which, they say, has not left indifferent during his trips to Afghanistan or Mali.
There five years, London has launched a great competition to renew its fleet of armored infantry transport. Piranha 5 U.S. General Dynmics had emerged victorious. The VBCIs tried his luck, but caught by the level of protection in particular. The program was canceled since, and armored Nexter has improved.
Paying twenty VBCIs (initially focused on discussions about sixty copies), Paris is dated in the event that the British revive an acquisition program, 2017 whichever discussed.Nexter is ensured without signing a contract obviously, because across the Channel, nothing gets done without a competitive basis.
If confirmed Friday the loan VBCIs have a significant symbolic meaning to the extent that the French test - for an acquisition - the Watchkeeper tactical UAV English. It would be a (small) step towards interoperability of the two armies, one of the objectives of the Treaty of Lancaster House, which provides the establishment of a joint expeditionary force by 2016.
Uh.

Wow.

Google Translation again leaves alot to be desired but 20 VBCI's to be operated by UK forces?  I don't quite get it.  They already have a couple of programs going and they were on a "neck down" campaign to reduce the various numbers of vehicles in service (by that I mean various types).

If this is true then perhaps to their expeditionary forces but would that mean British Army or Marines?  Maybe their Air Assault Brigade?

Either way the hits keep coming.  Armor might be a bad word in US military circles but the rest of the world is doing some interesting things.

X-47 to get to sea before the F-35C.



via USNI News.
The U.S. Navy plans to take the Northrop Grumman X-47B Unmanned Combat Air System-Demonstrator (UCAS-D) aircraft out to sea onboard an aircraft carrier this summer to test how well it operates together with manned aircraft around the ship and on the flight deck.
“We also plan later this summer—later this year—to do dedicated blending and what we call cooperative operations of manned carrier aircraft and the X-47B,” Rear Adm. Mat Winter, Naval Air Systems Command’s program executive officer for unmanned aviation, told USNI News during a Jan. 30 interview in Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md.
During the two previous X-47B at-sea periods onboard USS George HW Bush (CVN-77) and USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) in 2013, while the unmanned demonstrator had a Boeing F/A-18 chase aircraft, the two types did not operate together on the carrier flight deck. This time around the manned F/A-18 and X-47B will operate from the carrier together cooperatively.
Did you get the full implications of the Admiral's statement?

The X-47 will be going BACK to sea to determine how it operates with manned aircraft!

Before the F-35C makes it to sea for the first time, this unmanned combat aircraft will be taking the first steps toward becoming integrated with the carrier air wing.

It is becoming more and more obvious that the US Navy is planning on having a seagoing deep strike fighter that is not named F-35. 

Sidenote:  I really wish the Navy would consider wargaming a X-47 only carrier (designate it UAV Strike Carrier) and have it operate alongside a normally staffed carrier...call it an enhanced carrier battle group.  By super packing X-47's aboard a carrier and beefing up the aviation section just a bit, the amount of sorties launched could actually boggle the mind.  This is the only tech that I see us developing that would give the Chinese fits.

USS America Class for the Japanese?

Many thanks to Rohan for sending me this link!



via jiji.com
In response to the policy that emphasizes remote islands and defense of the East China Sea, the response to large-scale disasters such as the Nankai Trough earthquake in the new National Defense Program Guidelines adopted by the Cabinet in December last year has been shown, the Ministry of Defense, aviation and transportation capacity I introduced into the Maritime Self-Defense Force amphibious assault ship with excellent operational capability. By 2018, the final year medium-term defense buildup plan to be based on the Charter, established the equipment procurement goal of 5 years (medium-term proof), consider the equipment and functions required. After that, I embody the implementation plan.
 In the medium-proof, clearly "on the study, to obtain conclusions about the existence of multi-functional ship" with the aim to quickly deploy the Self-Defense Forces troops in the remote island defense. You wrote "The rapid transport of troops sufficient scale, completeness initial response to Expand" and also in response to the Nankai Trough earthquake.
I have to admit that I'm shocked.

Shocked and amazed.

The Japanese are competent ship builders and have no need to go looking for a capable amphibious assault ship.

So this is more about gaining friends or strengthening friendships than it is about gaining a new capability.  If this is aimed at buying the America Class LHA then the Japanese are seeking to tie their military into our own in not only military theory but also in sharing equipment.

Want to talk about real cross decking?  If you operate the same ships it becomes much much easier.

Imagine this.

The US Marine Corps has always complained about a dearth of shipping.  What happens when the Japanese suddenly find themselves with two ships sitting around that they can't fill?

Sounds like the US Marines and US Army (wouldn't that be a kick in the pants...the Army gets feet wet aboard Japanese amphibs!) just found a new ride.  I wonder how the S. Koreans and Chinese would react to that? 

Tata Defense to produce a Wheeled Armored Amphibious Vehicle. via Army Recognition.


Read the story here.

Consider this vehicles specs.  It mounts an ATK Mk44 30mm Bushmaster Cannon.  The same weapon specified for the canceled EFV.  It uses a Kongsberg turret that allows the installation of Javelin missiles along with the cannon.  The only real mystery is the number of Marines it can carry.

Its basically an Indian version of the Marine Personnel Carrier.

Are you getting the force of connection here?

Everyone and anyone in the Pacific region is developing new amphibious armored vehicles.

Friday, January 31, 2014

If you're into Military History/Theory/Tech then start watching economic conditions!

Things are going down hill at an accelerated rate.

I'm not necessarily talking about the US or Europe (although the case can be made) but more importantly the emerging markets.  Check this out from Reuters.
The Federal Reserve's decision to keep trimming its economic stimulus drew fire on Friday as India's central bank chief said Americans should be more attuned to the global impact of their policies, and the IMF called for vigilance given strains in financial markets.
The push-back came on Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke's last day on the job and two days after the U.S. central bank reduced the pace of its huge asset purchase program. The Fed made the move on Wednesday despite a bruising selloff in emerging markets that was prompted in part by the prospect of less U.S. monetary support.
With the turmoil in currencies and stocks spreading into more emerging markets on Friday, Fed officials, addressing the rout for the first time, offered no hint the sell-off would influence their policy stance unless the U.S. economy were threatened.

But in Mumbai, Reserve Bank of India Governor Raghuram Rajan said the United States "should worry about the effects of its policies on the rest of the world."
Read the entire article but let me  be clear.

Economic uncertainty/unrest leads to SERIOUS trouble.

The Arab Spring?  The Obama Administration wants the world to believe that it was a democratic uprising.  The truth?  People were protesting over economic conditions.  Young men couldn't find jobs, food prices increased beyond the ability of the average person to afford it and life became hell for the masses.  Their answer?  They toppled the government.  The Islamist took over and concentrated on instituting Islamic Law instead of dealing with the issues that were of concern to the people.  Their answer?  They put the military back in charge!  That was just Egypt but the same issues played out all over the Middle East and parts of Africa.

Now we have that same set of circumstances about to hit India, Africa, Asian countries and S. America.

Shit is about to get real.  When internal problems are beyond the ability of govt to handle, scapegoats are sought and external enemies are always a good way to focus the masses. 

UPDATE:  Judgement day was averted in China by the Chinese govt using a proxy "investor" to save the Shadow Bank that was about to go under...or so the theory goes.  Whoever bought the debt is a savior to the market.  The world probably dodged the 2nd great depression and most don't even realize it.  Shadow Banking continues to be an issue.  Even with that, the Dow Jones closed 150 pt down today.  

Is it any wonder that US Army vehicle plans are jacked up?


What does it take to build a proper armored vehicle these days?  If Goure from the Lexington Institute is right then the US Army doesn't have a clue...
The Army’s inability to deliver on a new armored fighting vehicle may also reflect a bigger problem: its ever-changing concept of future land warfare. The Army has radically changed its views on land warfare at least three times over the past decade. Instability of strategic thought doesn’t provide a secure basis on which to build a force structure or define the requirements for a new armored fighting vehicle.
Changing theories of warfare?

Yeah.  That and a series of SECDef's that had changing priorities practically doomed any effort by the US Army.

Consider this.  

*Rumsfeld wanted a high tech, light weight force that could fight outnumbered and win against larger, heavier forces.  This vehicle was to use information warfare and advanced munitions to make up for deficiencies in traditional armor.

*Gates wanted a force that was designed to fight a generational war on terror.  Roadside bombs were the main issue and he demanded a vehicle that was capable of protecting a squad of infantry not only from the biggest bombs so far seen but also defeat RPGs and small arms fire.

*Hagel.  This one is a bit confusing.  He hasn't exactly spelled out any theory, just stated that we're pivoting to the Pacific and the Army is attempting to figure out the intent of the SECDef and get its house in order.

Is it any wonder that Army vehicle plans have been jacked up?

Sidenote:  Shinseki showed how to do vehicle procurement in this day and age.  First line up Congressional support for funding.  Decide on how much you have to spend.  Pick the vehicle you want.  Label it interim and JUST FREAKING DO IT!  No long solicitation.  No messing around with competitions.  Just get it done. 

Thursday, January 30, 2014

Customs and Border Protection Helo Pic.

A U.S. Customs and Border Protection UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter takes off as an F-16C Fighting Falcon from the New Jersey Air National Guard's 177th Fighter Wing is seen parked in the background on Jan. 28 at Atlantic City Air National Guard base, N.J. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection spent the day briefing the media on the role they will play as part of the total force effort for security at Super Bowl XLVIII. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Tech. Sgt. Matt Hecht/Released)

This thing will spiral out of control. Japan to force planes to land...

via Alert 5 from Sankei.jp
 the 28th, it was found that it has embarked on the development of corresponding documentation at the time of the Air Self-Defense Force is an airspace violation to foreign aircraft. Development of the manual for the first time.I have in mind the information collector fighters and China to repeat the airspace access and overflight in the air of the Senkaku Islands (Ishigaki, Okinawa Prefecture) nearby. Manual is focused on increasing the effectiveness of forced landing, review of the use of weapons authority also become an urgent issue.
 In response to the December two years ago, propeller-driven aircraft of the China State Oceanic Administration has overflight in the air around the Senkaku, ASDF went into the development process of the manual.
 Japan Coast Guard to address the territorial sea intrusion, but to deal with the overflight It 's ASDF fighter. However, the authority of the pilot is limited to forced landing instructions and warning shots. Certain that 1987, we fired warning shots in the Soviet Union military aircraft is ASDF, but there is no case that was a forced landing.
Google translate doesn't do a very good job but it appears that they're going to force planes to land and hand the crew/passengers over to police.

But what happens if they refuse to land?

Do you shoot the planes down?

This thing will get out of control and people will die.  The State Dept and Pentagon need to be all over this or we will see a regional war before my 5 year prediction. 

What I learned from Snow-pocalypse.

Not mine but close...I don't have the bug shield but otherwise, even down to the color, pretty spot on!
The snow is finally starting to melt, so now is a good time to do a lessons learned....

1.  I will never, EVER sell my Ford Bronco.  That beast has a powerful V8, 4 wheel drive, its setup with extra batteries and alternator, a winch and handled the snow and ice without problem.  Keep your new aluminum F-150.  I'll stick to the tried and true.

2.  Vehicle bug out bags are real.  I didn't have to make use of one, but I bet the folks in Atlanta wish they had one.  In winter time you're an idiot if you don't have blankets, flashlights, food, water, spare clothes, weather proof boots etc...

3.  Alternate methods of heating.  I don't care if you use propane, wood, wood pellets, kerosene or whatever but you need to have a way of heating your home during storms.  Again I didn't need it but the propane heater was ready to go and its only a short trek to get more firewood.

4.  Stock up on food before the event.  The store shelves reminded me of a run before a hurricane.  They were trashed (what was left).  People always shop at the last minute for things and this event was no exception.

Long story short?

Prepping, being prepared, getting ready for the zombie apocalypse...whatever you call it, pays off.

Government is slow, cumbersome and in general idiotic.  No one should entrust their health, comfort and well being to another man.

EFV lite is the ACV future.


Check this out from AOL's Breaking Defense.
“We’ve done the homework now. It’s taken three years of a lot of rigorous analysis to figure out the high water speed business,” Amos said at the RAND event. (RAND is closely linked to the Army and the Air Force, and Amos is the first Marine Commandant to visit that he or anyone else I talked to can remember). “You can build a high-water-speed vehicle and you can make it affordable — yes, I’m convinced of it — but the issue is the trade-offs in the capabilities inside that vehicle.”
Within the limits of current technology and budgets, it seems, making an affordable troop transport that can skim across the water at high speeds requires too many compromises to its capabilities as a combat vehicle once on land. And while Marines come from the sea,they fight on the land.
“This vehicle will live predominantly, probably 99 percent of its time, ashore,” Amos said. “In Iraq we had our amphibious tractors ashore; we had hundreds of them ashore,” for years.
Read the entire article, but a quick decode....a transformer type ACV is going to cost too much, and although we were real close to making it work last time, we're broke because the F-35 is raping us.

Which leads me to my next bone of contention.

Why did we do this entire exercise?  Why didn't we ....
1.  Jump all over General Dynamics offering of a non-planning EFV that they practically begged us to take (at what is rumored to be bargain basement pricing) or...
2.  Wait on tech to develop and purchase the BAE Super AV now (which I'm being told by little birdies aced the swim and blasts test..AND we could get for a song).

Instead we're still looking at getting a new vehicle in 2020-2025.  The sad thing?  No one in the region is waiting on the USMC to make a decision.  Everyone is developing a Marine Corps and everyone is acquiring vehicles that are more powerful than the long serving AAV.

The Marine Corps has aviation well covered.  Even when the F-35 fails, we'll still have AV-8B Harriers (thank you Brits) that will be viable until 2030.

The current vulnerability lies in troop lift to the edge of the battle.  The AAV and MTVR are poor substitutes for a dedicated and capable armored personnel carrier/infantry fighting vehicle. 

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Rafale NG? via Cavok Brazil. UPDATE!!!!

All photos via Cavok Brazil.




The above photos are of a rumored Rafale NG that is being worked on.  Supposedly it will have RCS treatment and sensor fusion.  CB website says that its reminiscent of the Northrop-Tempest Grumman F/A-36.  I'm not familiar with that plane so I don't know.  Quite honestly I'm not even sure if this fantasy mock-up meets the definition of low RCS.  I'm attempting to get more info.  If you have then hit me up.

Gripen News (if you're not following them you should) informed me that the above renders are from the fevered mind of an aviation enthusiast in Argentina of what a stealth-ified Rafale would look like.  I got taken in and it appears another blogger did too.  It happens.

Polish Rosomak & Leopard 2's at Exercise Steadfast Jazz.










F-35. "...a bulkhead "severed."

via Standard.net
In a full-page discussion of durability testing and cracking, Gilmore disclosed an incident in late September when a bulkhead "severed." He said "analysis and corrective actions" were continuing.
Aircraft based in Florida, Arizona, California and Nevada for pilot training missions continue "to be immature" and rely "heavily on contractor support and workarounds unacceptable in combat operations," Gilmore wrote.
Reliability measures "are all below" target goals for the current stage of development, he said.
The aircraft's weight stabilized last year, with little margin for growth without exceeding contractually binding limits that would jeopardize meeting combat requirements, Gilmore said.
What should F-35 supporters be saying?



Tuesday, January 28, 2014

US Army's Ultra Light Combat Vehicle Solicitation.

Thanks Michael..this is EYE OPENING!

via FBO.gov
Below are the threshold ULCV general requirements providing enhanced mobility for IBCT Soldiers.

a. Payload. Vehicle must carry Infantry Squad (9 Soldiers) with equipment (3200 lbs).

b. Protection. Base level of protection is provided by high mobility to avoid enemy contact and Soldier Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) (since the vehicle supports dismounted Soldiers).

c. Survivability. The ULCV (at GVW) shall provide a crashworthy vehicle structure capable of maintaining structural integrity in a rollover; quantified as a crush resistant roof structure or rollover bars capable of supporting 100% of its own GVW after a dynamically applied impact load.

d. Mobility.
a) Provide mobility with 10% on primary roads, 10% on secondary roads, 75% cross-country and trails, and 5% in urban, rubble environment.
b) Perform in Terrain level III (ridges/summits)
c) Routinely tasked to hold position on cross-country and trail conditions.


e. Lethality. Provide threshold capability to host crew served weapons assigned to an IBCT Infantry squad. Objective is to incorporate a medium caliber weapon into squad operations.

f. Transportability.
a) Internally transportable by CH-47 (in combat configuration under High/Hot conditions).
b) Sling load transportable by UH-60 (in combat configuration under High/Hot conditions).
c) Air drop from C130 on 463L pallet (in combat configuration).
d) Air drop from C17 dual row 463L pallet (in combat configuration).


g. Sustainability. Maintain high operational readiness rates through rugged construction and modular component replacement under field conditions.

h. Protection. Vehicle will provide FMVSS compliant restraints to Soldiers riding inside the vehicle and storage capability for individual equipment and squad equipment.

i. Range. 250-300 mile range on internal fuel.

j. No add-on communication equipment requirement.
Read the entire posting here.

THE US ARMY CAN'T BE SERIOUS!  They want to be able to transport 9 Soldiers with an internally carried vehicle (inside a CH-47)...want it light enough to be sling loaded by a UH-60....and they've essentially said screw land mines because we're going to use off road mobility to be where the mines ain't!

This tells me everything I need to know.

The US Army is in a tailspin over the pivot to the Pacific and they see themselves in a real deal fight for relevancy.

Its really unfortunate for not only the Army but the nation.  The US needs a credible Army to fight wars.  Not another expeditionary force.   

F-35C Arrestment Pic

An F-35C test aircraft successfully catches a wire during testing at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md., in December 2013.

Something is screwy with this tailhook story.  Check out this blurb from USNI News on the tailhook
Lockheed and the Joint Strike Fighter program office ultimately traced the problem back to the shape of the hook and a faulty wire dynamics model supplied by the Naval Air Systems Command. The solution was to reshape the hook point and adjust the system’s hold-down damper, which helps prevent the hook from bouncing around upon touchdown.
NAVAIR isn't that sloppy.  Meanwhile check this out from the X-47 program which also experienced a faulty tailhook...
The team at FRCSW did not hesitate when asked to redesign this instrumental X-47B component. Within a few weeks of receiving the initial request from the UCAS team, the FRC signed a formal work order July 10, anticipating the
manufacturing and shipping process would take up to one month.
The UCAS and FRC teams worked together to overcome a series of complications to ensure the hook points were completed as quickly as possible. For example, machining the first steel part took longer than expected. As a result, the FRC made an investment in a more efficient machine to decrease cycle times.
In less than two months, despite the design challenges, the UCAS team received the completed parts from FRCSW in early August, avoiding costly delays and allowing the team to proceed with aircraft testing. Since then, the X-47B successfully engaged the arresting gear with the redesigned hook point during three separate roll-in arrestment tests.
The X-47 experienced a similar issue and the problem was solved in a couple of months.

The issue with the F-35 has lingered for almost a year and we still aren't sure if its solved.

Of course I could be reading all this wrong.

Check out the USNI News story here.
Read the NAVAIR X-47 story here. 


Indonesia receives BMP-3F.

Thanks for the article Jonathan!





via Defense-Aerospace.com
The floating BMP-3F, also known the “naval option”, is designed for marine units, as well as border and coastal defense troops, that would use the vehicle for fighting in the coastal zone, on the coast, and in amphibious assaults. Its arsenal has a unique set of weapons, including a 100-mm gun, 30 mm gun, guided missiles, and a machine gun.

The combat vehicle has a three-person crew and can transport seven people.

The vehicle’s design allows it to act like a boat in waves at least three points at a speed of ten kilometers per hour for seven hours while firing in waves of up to two points. It can begin driving again in waves of less than three points, climbing out of the water onto land on its own.

In addition, the BMP-3F can tow supplies for use in a sea raid.
Read the entire story by following the link at the top of the blurb.  Notice that another nation is fielding a credible Amphibious Combat Vehicle.

Sidenote:  Can anyone translate what "waves up to two points" equals in sea states?


F-35 DOTE 2013

"I was walking along and this fell out the back of a truck"

Monday, January 27, 2014

The Dutch are freaking insane. via Jalopnik



Those stunt dummies must have been smoking some real good stuff to volunteer for this mess.

I mean really?  Seriously?

The Dutch are insane.