I got an interesting note from a reader of this blog and I thought I would share it....
I can't wait for the "supporters" to attempt to refute this info.
Hi Sol,If the Volleyballer is even halfway right then my suspicion that we might never see this thing work as planned is spot on.
I read an interesting article today on the F-35 software problems here: https://medium.com/war-is-boring/b6ae0dd4d0ee
For me, this was the first article that really touches on the main problem for the F-35. It isn't the hardware, it's the software. In fact, in the 21st century, most engineering problems are software related and not much to do with hardware.
The article made a misquotes the number of lines of code (LOC) for the F-35 at 8 million, but actually that's just for the battle management software. The total lines of code in the F-35 is approximately: 23 million.
To provide some quick related reference:
Space shuttle: 400K LOC
F-22 Raptor: 1.2 M LOC
Curiosity Rover: 5 M LOC
Boeing 787: 5.5 M LOC
F-35 Lightning II: 23 M LOC
Healthcare.gov: 400M LOC
Why is the F-35 software so much more complex than the F-22's? Mostly it's because of two features: Networking & Collaboration. But it's also due to poor code documentation, bureaucratic management, and multiple vendors. Ignoring whether those two features are useful, whenever these two words appear in a software development project, re-designs and delays occur. Go ask any software project managers with experience in government work and they will tell you the same thing.
But I think everybody knows which aircraft reigns supreme: the F-22. Simplicity really is the ultimate sophistication. The F-35 was born out of politics, its problems were compounded by politics, and its demise will be due to politics. Talk about a vicious cycle.
It was a mistake to close the F-22 assembly line. The correct choice should've been to produce more F-22s with cheaper materials (steel or aluminum vs composites) and sticking with the F/A-18 for carrier aviation until the F-22 could be naval-ized.
Volleyballer out
I can't wait for the "supporters" to attempt to refute this info.