Monday, September 29, 2014

SU-100 in service with Yemeni Rebels.

Photo via War Machine

"War is timeless, so are we."
-Every godamm WWII Soviet armor.

Yemeni rebels with a Czechoslovak-made SD-100 (Licensed version of the Su-100). The picture is taken less than a month ago.

Sunday, September 28, 2014

Militarization of fitness?


via Greatist.com
How Does the Militarization of Fitness Affect Your Workout?
In every way possible. It affects your health, happiness, the sustainability of your program, and your ability to reach your goals.
Do you believe any of the following are true?
*No pain, no gain. You have to suffer to get in shape.
*More is always more. Duh.
*Working out is not fun, but it's an obligation.
*If I don’t almost throw up, I’m holding back too much.
*You’re only as good as your last workout.
*I feel like a loser when I miss a workout.
If you answered yes, then you're at the “exercise is war” understanding of fitness. And that’s fine—if you want to wage war on your body, go ahead. Many of us go through that phase. I spent a decade there, with plenty of joint casualties and war stories to prove it. So I’m not belittling you—I’m just saying that this isn’t the only way to train, and it sure as heck isn’t sustainable. And if you can benefit from my experience and mistakes, that would be swell.
I read the above and then did a quick search through my memory to try and figure out when it happened.

I point to the late  Navy Seal Scott Helvenston.  As much as I can tell he was the first with a really popular and mainstream Navy Seal training vid.  Soon after we saw them pop up from all the special ops units, some of the conventional forces and even law enforcement.

Even today one of the more popular books on the subject is called Corps Strength.

So where did it come from?  I'm not sure.  I guess that its part of the nation being at war for over a decade.  Everyone saw the military at war and since most didn't have the desire or the ability to serve, they decided to "train" as if they were.  Remember this is the time when we've seen cross fit, tough mudder, and extreme this and that pop up.

Workouts are work.  But you're suppose to love this work.

Prepper Info. Make milk from nuts!


Click here to get the chart yourself if this is too small to read.  I think I'll try to make some homemade almond milk.

Oh and just to inform, I did the same experiment as American Mercenary on testing my food stores for a month.  That's why I am so interested in intermittent fasting.  I found that my reliance on being able to "restock" at the local grocery store was a definite minus.  Additionally what I had allotted for being a month of food was inadequate (weight lifting instead of doing survival tasks) if I was engaged in physical activity.

Also I think I'm going to do a 90 degree turn, follow Joe's advice (he's a fellow Marine---pics going up of some stuff that his FAST Team are doing soon) and switch from Atkins to Paleo because its more in keeping with the food stuffs available in case of a SHTF.

Eric Frien's tactical mistake.


First check this out from American Mercenary...
So the end of Frein's story is already clear, either he will die by cop, or be captured. So far he hasn't removed himself from the area of operations, didn't build a tribe or support network to escape and evade, and is now plastered on every BOLO (be on the look out) list of every law enforcement agency.
So the lesson to learn here is clear, if you are going to commit a crime don't fail at basic OPSEC. Don't write a manifesto. Don't leave shell casings in your vehicle. Don't use your cell phone. Don't keep trophies.

I don't know why people do these things, but I suspect it is because they want others to know of the rightness of their cause, of how they were so aggrieved that murder was justified, or some other nonsense.
AM is absolutely right of course.  A quick "lessons learned" from both the Frein and Dorner affairs tells me one thing.

They ignored basic military planning (even though both supposedly had military training).  A recruit just out of Marine Boot Camp could have avoided many of the mistakes these two made/are making by simply employing the BAMCIS ditty.

Law Enforcement is lucky.  Theses guys were operating off what seems to be some type of martyr complex.  They wanted to be known for "doing this thing".  One day soon LEO's will be faced with opponents that seek only victory, not fame.

And I'd bet body parts that those people are studying police response to both these incidents as we speak.

Saturday, September 27, 2014

Forcas Terrestres gives more info on Brazil's future 8x8 armored recon vehicle.

Thanks to DredSkay for the link.


via Forcas Terrestres.
The design of a new armored vehicle reconnaissance (VBR) for the Army will be developed from the next year in Minas Gerais. The new combat vehicle begins to be developed in 2015 and five years should be delivered the first cars. It is expected that the same line where today are manufactured the armored personnel transport medium wheel (VBPT-MR) Guarani, in Sete Lagoas is used. The Guarani hundredth produced in Minas will be delivered to the Army today.While availing the same platform, the vehicle will be faster, have reinforced armor and heavier artillery, thus enabling it to be used for reconnaissance. It will be the substitute of Cascavel, manufactured by Engesa from the 1970s and used in the Gulf War.
The car will use much of the parts and systems used in the first model. Among the adaptations to meet the new feature is the inclusion of a 105mm cannon, while the MR-VBTP the firepower of artillery was 30 mm or used machine guns point 50 and 762 . VBR will have capacity for three or four soldiers, the driver being the only occupant of the inside of the tower and the rest - the captain, and the shooter, if manual, a helper. Along the crew will be a basket which presents all the ammunition. The VBTP-MR has room for 11 people.
Interesting on a couple of levels.

Why are recon vehicles getting heavier than APC's world wide?  The Brazilians are doing it with this vehicle and the Brits did it with their new tracked ride.

Additionally it appears that "families of vehicles" are popular as are mobile gun systems.  The Japanese are producing one, the Italians have had them forever, the US Army adopted one and now the Brazilians are on the band wagon....are tanks really that expensive to operate?

This program bears watching.  As someone said, the Brazilians are to be praised for doing what the US Army and Marine Corps seem unable to do.  Actually get a vehicle into production and out to their forces. 

J-31 on flight deck of Chinese aircraft carrier via Chinese Military Review.


One question.

Why would the Chinese release a photo of their stealth fighter on an under construction aircraft carrier?

UAE makes its first payment to the US for fighting ISIS.

Thanks for the link Jonathan.


via Washington Post.
The United States is close to a $2.5 billion deal with the United Arab Emirates that will send 4,569 mine-resistant vehicles to the Middle Eastern country as Washington wraps up its long war in Afghanistan.
The Pentagon announced the pending deal Friday. It calls for a foreign military sale of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles, along with the necessary parts, equipment, training and logistical support.

“MRAPs,” as they are commonly known, are made by numerous manufacturers and have been commonly used in Iraq and Afghanistan to protect U.S. and coalition service members from improvised explosive devices buried in the roads. They were developed with a V-shaped armored hull to deflect bomb blasts.
The deal with the UAE, an Arab partner in airstrikes launched in Syria this week, calls for Washington to deliver mostly MaxxPro MRAPs made by Navistar Defense, a truck maker with headquarters in Lisle, Ill. Other principal contractors involved include BAE Systems of Sealy, Tex., and Oshkosh Defense in Oshkosh, Wis.
The vehicles would be refurbished and sold to the UAE as excess defense articles that were previously owned by the U.S. Army, officials said. Defense officials have said that they have been looking to sell excess MRAPs to partner nations for some time, but the scope of the deals were not clear.
OK.  This is pure speculation on my part and explains the title of this post.

THERE IS NOT FUCKING WAY THE UAE NEEDS 4,000 plus MRAPS! 

This is simply payment for services rendered.  They talked the US President into fighting a war for them and this is how they pay him back.  Refurbished MRAPS at the price for new ones and having US labor doing the work means an uptick in employment just in time to grease the numbers before the election.

Yeah, its cynical but nothing else makes sense.

There are Marines that haven't been born yet that will ride AAV's....

**Video removed. It affected blog performance. Follow the link below to be taken to the article containing it.

Did you check out the video?  The AAV will serve at least another 21 years..the take away quote that had me cleaning my computer screen...
"There are Marines that haven't been born yet that will ride in AAVs..."
Now that you've digested that, check this out from the Washington Times...
The Marine Corps believes that improvements in wheeled vehicle technology will allow the private sector to build highly mobile troop carriers with the durability of armored amphibs. Upon completion, each ACV 1.1 will carry between 10 and 13 marines into battle, the website reported.
Now that the developmental phase for the new vehicle is complete, the Corps is ready to put out a formal Request For Proposal to industry in October, Military.com reported.
“The plan is to down select to two vendors. They will each build 16 vehicles. We will use those vehicles to demonstrate their capabilities and help inform the final requirements for ACV 1.2,” Col. Leimbach added.
The request for proposal (I believe this will be the second one) will be launched in Oct...at the same time Amos is leaving office.  All this is doing is hiding a procurement train wreck of epic proportions.  In short.  This isn't worth the paper its written on.  The damning thing is this.  He's picked a direction, screwed up the budget and is leaving all the hard decisions to General Dunford.

If Dunford cancels the ACV, then it will be Dunford that is choosing to avoid providing protected transport for his infantry.  If he chooses to delay the CH-53K, again, Dunford gets the blame.  If he WANTS to slow down F-35 purchases or cancel it outright, then he gets heat from the USAF and our allies.

Amos has fucked the Marine Corps AND his successor.

Friday, September 26, 2014

Turkey is actually a supporter of ISIS?

A reader linked to the below photos.  The first shows (according to him) Turkish border guards with ISIS fighters.  The second shows a Kurd being "welcomed" by Turkish border guards.

If this is true.  And I have not verified any of it, but if this is true then we need to seriously rethink our entire relationship with Turkey.




VBTP-MR Guarani 6x6 amphibious armored vehicles reaches production milestone...new 8x8 vehicle in the works.

All photos via Defesanet...




via Janes.
The Brazilian Army is expected to purchase a new batch of VBTP-MR Guarani 6x6 amphibious armoured vehicles from Iveco Latin America.
An order for 56 vehicles is scheduled to be finalised by early 2015 for about BRL200 million (USD83 million), which was allocated in Brazil's planned budged for 2015.
This new contract is to be awarded by the Logistics Command instead of by the army's Department of Science and Technology, which contracted for previous vehicle sets, as the project moves from a develop stage to procurement.
On 26 September the 100th vehicle was delivered to the army, with 128 vehicles purchased so far and scheduled to be completed by December 2014.
Amazing.

Brazil is moving with speed on this project...but before this one is even completed they're working on an 8x8 based on the same vehicle.  Consider me impressed.

Thursday, September 25, 2014

Envoy

General Dynamics bets against ACV?

LAV 6.0
Via Military Technology...
Gary O’Brien, Capture Manager with General Dynamics Land – Systems Canada, explained the company would present a modified version of the Light Armored Vehicle (LAV) 6.0, similar to those in use by the Canadian military, O’Brien explained the vehicle combines LAV chassis with a purpose-built ACV demonstrator unit, has successfully completed initial testing by the USMC Amphibious Vehicle Test Branch.
First I had never heard of the designation LAV 6.0 and a very big second is that I hadn't heard that the vehicle had completed test at AVTB.

I'm not sure of what to make of this.  An improved LAV 6.0 that has been made amphibious?  I wonder what physical changes were made.  Could this be a token effort and they realize that they either have more time to come up with a better solution or are they outright betting against this vehicle ever making it into service?

Amy Butler aka "Wonder Woman" dishes the dirt on the F-22 strikes...


Critical Thinking.  A skill set that is little used in today's world.  Unfortunately we live in a time when "group think" is praised and contrary opinions are ostracized.  It takes courage to go against the flow and state the obvious.  Amy..... Ms. Butler if you're nasty, (sorry I was once a Janet Jackson fan) has done just that in her latest.  Read it here but check out some tidbits...
The air campaign that began this week over Syria was carried out in what Lt. Gen. William Mayville, director of operations for the Joint Staff described as “passive” air defenses.
Syria, however, is purported to possess decent air defenses –- some possibly integrated. And, we’ve not heard anything about Syrian air countering coalition assets. Arguably, this is a unique diplomatic backdrop for the debut of an asset designed at great cost to sneak in and out of air defenses and defeat any fighter that takes it on in the skies.
Yeah, that's right.

Just as I said earlier.  The Syrians weren't about to launch on our forces.  There was no need for the F-22 and any thinking person knows that.  Additionally while the USAF has all but abandoned electronic warfare (tossing a few crew to serve in USN EW squadrons isn't impressive), the thought that the stealth abilities of the F-22 were needed in a benign environment lacks credibility.  But wait there's more!
“What we were looking at was the effects we wanted to see on the target areas and what platforms in the region would be best suited to do that,” he said during a Sept. 23 briefing. “We had a large menu of targets to strike from, and then we chose from there. 
So, it's less the platform than it is the effects we seek, and then it's what platform can deliver those effects. That's really the job of the [combined air operations center].”
Effects we seek?

Seriously?

Really?

A 1000 lb bomb is a 1000 lb bomb.  The results will be the same whether dropped from a F-16, F-18, B-2, B-52....or F-22.

This guy was plain lying.

The next question we need to ask is why.

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Mission Creep on steroids. Army Division HQ headed to Iraq.

via Army Times.
As the U.S. expands its war against the Islamic State, the Army is preparing to deploy a division headquarters to Iraq.
Officials have not identified the division that will deploy — the first division headquarters to go to Iraq since the U.S. withdrawal in 2011.
An official announcement is expected in the coming days. But Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno recently confirmed the Army “will send another division headquarters to Iraq to control what we’re doing there, a small headquarters.”

It’s unclear how many soldiers will be sent, or how long they will deploy. Division headquarters average between 100 and 500 soldiers and deploy for one year.
You can stick a fork in it.

We're back at war in Iraq.


WTF!!!! This female has issues!






What is going on with Fast Roping from V-22's?


I've noticed the same thing in a few pics (this is from the SOCOM exercise Jackal Stone 2014)...the rope always ends up in a "slide for life" type position.

Is this by design?  Have they changed Fast Rope techniques and this is the preferred way now?  If not, is this a problem with the airplane?  I've noticed that the HRST Master doesn't seem to delay the Ropers and sends them anyway so what gives.

Havoc 8x8 (Patria AMV) aces test...


via MarketWatch
DALLAS, Sept. 23, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Lockheed Martin's [NYSE: LMT] Havoc 8x8 Armored Modular Vehicle successfully completed the Nevada Automotive Test Center's challenging Butte Mountain Trail course, one of the most severe off-road test tracks in the world. Teamed with Patria, Havoc is Lockheed Martin's entry in the U.S. Marine Corps' Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) Phase I program.
The mile-long course has nearly 1,000 feet of elevation change and extremely rugged, rocky stretches that have damaged and disabled numerous vehicles over the years.
"Over the course of 10 days of testing, we performed more than 40 test runs up and down the mountain while demonstrating the vehicle's ride quality and crew comfort," said Scott Greene, vice president of Ground Vehicles at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control. "Not once did the Havoc fail. And we were told numerous times that this course has stopped many vehicles over the years, including tanks."
The testing, funded and conducted by Lockheed Martin, was undertaken to validate the company's solution to the Marine Corps' need for a survivable and robust wheeled, amphibious vehicle. The Marine Corps will conduct its own series of automotive, amphibious and protection tests of 16 Havoc vehicles once the ACV program is under way. The program's Request for Proposal is expected in early 2015
"Our passengers were complementary of the Havoc's handling, ride quality, acceleration and braking throughout the demo while at a fully armored weight," said Patrick Shepherd, Havoc program manager at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control. "The most highly appreciated design features they noticed were how quiet the vehicle interior was and the smoothness of the Havoc ride throughout the demonstration."
Read it all here.

Remember the vid from yesterday?  The Commandant talking about pressurizing industry to get a vehicle into the field as soon as possible?

The ironic thing is that industry was, has been, and is ready.  The Marine Corps wasn't, isn't and probably won't be for quite a while.

F-22 use and mission creep...


First check this out from Breaking Defense...
“Effective planning requires the use of the right force at the right place at the right time,” Dave Deptula, the man who ran the air war in Afghanistan, says in an email. “The F-22 is the world’s most advanced combat aircraft and has the ability to negate the effectiveness of threat air defense systems. That’s why it was used in this case. There was no “dry spell,” rather the previous operations in the permissive airspace of Iraq and Afghanistan did not require their capabilities.”
Don't be fooled.

The F-22 wasn't needed to penetrate Syrian air space.  Not unless you believe the Israeli Air Force is MUCH better than our own.

Why do I say that?

Simple.  The Israeli's have been running missions into Syria for a while now.  Additionally they've struck targets with impunity.  The Syrians have never been able to lay a hand on them.

So lets put away the fiction that the F-22 was necessary for the success of these strikes.

UPDATE!!!!  Patrick reminded me of another fact.  Why weren't Syrian air defenses attacked if they were a threat to US war planes?  They weren't attacked and they didn't fire on our jets!  That tells me that there was either military to military contact that worked out the arrangement OR diplomatic back channel means were used.  What does that mean?  THAT MEANS THAT THE F-22 WAS SENT OUT ON A MISSION FOR PURE PUBLICITY AND NOTHING ELSE!

Now that we've put away that insanity have you noticed the mission creep?  Did you notice the emphasis on striking the Khorasan Group?

Never heard of those guys before a couple of days ago and suddenly they're the main effort?

Interesting.

Its also fucking mission creep, it also expands the war and its all bullshit.  Why are we hitting those guys?  Why are they a threat to the US?  Why are they suddenly a threat to the region and the world?

When you get the answer let me know.

Should the US institute a secret Hannibal Directive if a pilot is captured.

I ask this in all seriousness.  Should the US institute a secret Hannibal Directive if a pilot, special ops troop or other personnel is captured by terrorists?  A little background.  The IDF has the HD as a backup if efforts to rescue captured personnel prove futile.  What is it?  It means that they attempt to kill the captors AND the IDF member by use of air, artillery, or naval gunnery strikes.

Is it the right thing to do?

I just don't know.

What I do know is that ISIS has changed the game...well quite honestly they simply raised awareness.  Many people have been tortured and then mercilessly killed by terrorists.  They just never broadcast it live for the world to see.  Remember the attack in Mumbai?  Want to know why I was so outraged?  Because the terrorists attacked, brutally beat,  raped an elderly woman while her husband watched, castrated him and then shot them both in the face.

You know the issues with ISIS and their decapitating journalists.  So what should we do if one of our pilots is captured?  Could we consider a full on Tomahawk strike a gentle mercy?  I'm wondering.