Monday, November 24, 2014

The Australian Navy’s game-changing $1.5 billion warship


Read the story here.

Want a "what the fuck" moment?  Check out this statement from the story...
Senator Johnston said....“We have learnt the lesson of the Anzac ships and Collins submarines that worrying about schedule can cause problems.”
Really?

Seriously?

Worrying about a schedule can cause problems?

Absolutely amazing.

RoK Marines launching Spike anti-tank/vessel missiles to sea & A side-note on repulsing an amphibious assault.

The Marine Corps is launching precision guided weapons hit the spike firing exercises at sea conducted in the last 21 days (Google Translate)





Side-note:  The SecDef suggested that the US Army utilize its Patriot missiles to allow it to participate in operations in the Pacific.  Additionally the idea of them using anti-ship missiles so that they could integrate with Navy aircraft/ships and US Air Force assets was also mentioned.  I wonder why some Marine Corps general wasn't pounding the table saying bullshit!  One of the core competencies of the Marine Corps is suppose to be not only assaulting and then establishing forward operating bases (amphibious assaults) but port seizures AND repelling enemy assaults...even those that come from the sea (enemy amphibious assaults).  The focus has been too much on tech and not enough on doing the "Marine thing".  Re-doing Bold Alligator into a port seizure exercise and then turn it around and have the forces repulse an enemy attack would prove more instructive then the dog and pony show its become.

Riddle me this...and take your time. When was the last time the United States Marine Corps practiced port seizures.  

Side-note 1:  The above illustrates what I've been saying about the idea of using LCACs and JHSVs to carry AAVs and MPCs to an "in stream launch" approx 3 miles from the beach.  You're still going to have to do the hard work of destroying enemy fortifications, missile systems etc.  Same applies with heliborne assaults using MV-22s and CH-53Ks.  Leadership wants a free lunch.  There are none.  You want the beach?  You got to put in the work!  Of course this leads to an even more troubling question.  If you have to fight to the beach then do you need (trying to take out my bias here) amphibious vehicles?  Does a marinized Stryker make sense in this constrained budget era?

Sunday, November 23, 2014

French Unmanned Surface Vessel (USV)...

#Drones - the Sterenn - of the (Black Star in breton) is a 17 m long aluminum catamaran, 7.50 m wide, with a displacement of 24.5 tons.
It is an Unmanned Surface vehicle (USV), a surface vehicle without crew for the mine action.
The purpose of this program, intended to replace the current tripartite mine hunters, is to have gear without crews, staff work remotely on boat-mother - Credits: A.Monot / Navy (Translated by Bing)

Venezuelan Marines set to receive Chinese VN-1 Wheeled Amphibious Vehicles...


via Janes.
Images from the official Twitter account of the Venezuelan Navy indicate that the Bolivarian Naval Infantry could soon be equipped with three different Chinese amphibious fighting vehicles: a development that would make Venezuela's marines one of the most potent amphibious forces in Latin America.
Images posted on 16 November show a delegation led by Venezuelan Admiral Jairo Avendano Quintero receiving the VN1 8x8 wheeled amphibious infantry fighting vehicle (IFV), while others show the delegation inspecting VN18 and VN16 amphibious IFVs, apparently at a China North Industries Corporation (Norinco) plant.
The Venezuelan Navy confirmed the VN1 purchase in July and the most recent images probably date from then.
The Venezuelan Marines operating VN-1's, 16's and 18's wouldn't put them ahead in the neighborhood.

They'd merely be keeping pace.

The Brazilian Marines are/will operate AAVs, VTBP-MRs and soon the 8x8 version of that vehicle.  Additionally the Brazilians are developing a family of vehicles from that chassis.

The State Dept has been occupied in the Middle East, Europe and the Pacific.  The Dept of Defense has been focused on the same areas and in S. America the attention has been all over the map...drug running, illegal migration and the possibility of terrorist using S. America as a conduit to the US.

No one has been paying attention to the massive arms race that is taking place.

You buy a new toy, you use a new toy.

There are lots of new toys in S. America and the buying spree shows no sign of ending soon.

Saturday, November 22, 2014

Chinese Marines in Tanzania, Africa...

All pics via Chinese Military Review Blog.

Note:  Interesting that the Chinese military is making moves toward Africa.  I was under the impression that they were only involved economically.  If they're actually doing "partnership" exercises then I need to re-assess.  Additionally they seem to take "partnership" to another level.  It seems that the Chinese allow "host nation forces" to actually operate their vehicles during these exercises.  Is this a sales trip or something more?




C Sword 90 & FS46 pics...

Note:  C Sword 90 page here.  FS46 page here.

C Sword 90



FS46


CMN-Group's FS46 & C Sword 901 Brochures...



Friday, November 21, 2014

Is it time to change the size of the Marine Rifle Squad?

Is it time to change the size of the Marine Rifle Squad?  I ask that because while discussing the Marine Personnel Carrier and my gripe that the Rifle Squad will now be split and carried in two vehicles, USMC 0802 made this statement...
I would reduce the rifle squad to fit inside of a single vehicle and possibly play around with adding a 4th squad to the platoon. So you would have 4 squads of 8 or 9 Marines each per platoon, or possibly a 4th Platoon with 3 squads per platoon. Additionally I would base each squad around a CSW either a M240 for a support squad or a SMAW for an assault squad. This would reverse the idea that the CSWs support the rifleman and have the rifleman support the CSW. The German idea of WWII with a rifle squad built around a Panzershrek or a MG42.
I saw this based on my own experience in Afghanistan and reading where others have essentially recreated this same T/O. Many rifle companies in Afghanistan reduced their squads to 2 fire teams and added a 4th platoon. Additionally with all the weight most grunts carry squad sized firefights are typically conducted by the squad or platoon digging in and unleashing a torrent of well aimed fire back at the enemy. Bing West describes this style of fighting best in "A Million Steps."
If we bought the IFV version of the MPCs with a 25mm or 30mm main gun, it would give the squad leader a rifle fire team, a CSW fire team, and a vehicle mounting both a medium machine gun a high velocity cannon capable of firing PD, Delay, or programmable air burst ammo.
So a generic platoon would be 2 squads with M240, 1 squad with SMAW, all mechanized in 3 wheeled IFVs. You mechanize this force with M1A1 and you have serious ass kicking capability.
As for the idea of each squad leader having 3 rifle fire teams and a CSW team transported by 2 vehicles, I think that is too much for a squad leader to handle and still be in the thick of the fighting. Either the squad leader will have to pull back from the fight, more like a platoon commander, or he could be overwhelmed with 5 different maneuver elements. The platoon commander would still have 3 maneuver elements but that would include 6 vehicles and possible fighting between the squad leaders and platoon commander's over who owns the CSW teams.
Or you keep the MPC as a straight up APC that drops the grunts off 5 km from the objective in which case I think the 17 pax school bus is a better idea but you have to be very cautious too keep it out of harms way.
I think it would be worth taking a look at these ways of doing things and yes these are just ideas. It needs a real honest to God experiment ran on this with dedicated company and field grade officers that believe in their assigned idea. It needs to be judged and supervised by a General that is willing to run it as a true experiment and not have a dog in the fight on which of these succeeds or fails.

As for the dismounted troops that are transported by MV-22B or MTVR I would not touch them and leave the base platoon and company organization the same. Weapons company would probably have to be reworked if they were MV-22B transported.
My bitch with the statement?  Here we go changing our operating concepts (if we run with this idea and make no mistake...if HQMC is serious about the MPC becoming the production ACV then they're already considering this) not because its tactically more efficient but because it "fits" the vehicle that we're buying!

But enough about my "gripes".  What do you think.  Should we change the size of the Marine Rifle Squad?  Oh and before you say "yes this is the way to go!" understand that we are basically doing the "US Army" thing because we fucked up on the procurement of the AAV replacement...check out the pic below...that's a US Army Styker Brigade's Rifle Platoon.


Modest Proposal. Revamp the IRST21 concept.



I believe I have the answer for the US Navy when it comes to getting the features of the Advanced Super Hornet, while at the same time gaining a better solution for their IRST21 pod.  

Consider this.  The above photos are of the Boeing enclosed weapons pod which is part of the Advanced Super Hornet concept.  A fabulous idea!  How do you make it better?  Well check out the pics below.



Those are pics of the IRST21/fuel tank.

How about you combine the IRST21 with the enclosed weapons pod instead of a fuel tank?  It should provide you increased range because you no longer are hanging missiles off pylons...you gain the use of infra-red search and track...and you combine those two features into one program.

You would have to slam Lockheed Martin hard to make them work with Boeing... but it should be doable.  The concept for the IRST21 will need to be revamped.  Funding might have to be fought for again but I believe the benefits outweigh the headaches.

Lockheed Martin's IRST21 page.

Boeing's Advanced Super Hornet product card.

Canadian Patrol Concentration 2014...



via Canadian Army website.
Wainwright, Alberta — Rappelling from a CH-146 Griffon helicopter while hovering 20 metres above a wooded copse in sub-zero temperatures is only the first of many experiences that teams participating in the second annual Canadian Patrol Concentration (CPC) will take away from this uniquely Canadian training event.
Hosted by the Canadian Manoeuvre Training Centre (CMTC) from November 14 to 24, CPC 2014 provides an opportunity for Regular and Reserve Force soldiers from across Canada to competitively practice patrolling in an infantry reconnaissance patrol format.
“Employing core patrolling skills in austere conditions, participants will be bent, pushed and stretched to their physical and emotional limits,” says Chief Warrant Officer Martin Colbert, the Formation Sergeant Major for the CMTC. “In CPC 2014, our soldiers will have an amazing opportunity to demonstrate resiliency and to exercise the ingenuity and fortitude that Canadian soldiers are known for.”
Twenty-four patrols, consisting of eight members each, will be required to travel on foot more than 40 kilometres in inclement weather in order to gather information on a notional enemy, such as their size, location, disposition and habits. As the patrols make their way through their mission, how the scenario unfolds will depend on how the members of each team conduct themselves and respond to challenges placed before them.
Participants of CPC 2014 will return to their home units with experiences that they can share with their fellow soldiers and, ultimately, improve the overall patrolling expertise across the Canadian Army.
Hmm.

Sub zero temps?  40 kilometers (about 25 miles) in inclement weather?  Notional enemy?

I would love to observe this training.  Call it the cynic in me but I bet this turned into an endurance rather than patrolling exercise...I'm not talking physical endurance (even though being cold sucks donkey balls...especially when you stop) but more like mental.  Were they actually "patrolling" or was it really just a march to contact?  A real patrol covering 25 miles would be at least a couple of days affair if they were doing it right (as in trying to find the enemy when they don't know where he is) but the packs look too light for that.  I bet the after-action on this makes for real interesting reading.

With the Marines at Tarawa...via the official USMC FaceBook Page

PT Pindad Vid via Army Recognition

Thursday, November 20, 2014

Chinese CSK002 Airborne Assault Vehicle...

All pics via Auto Evolution.




via Auto Evolution
Having covered the ground assault, we’ll move on to the Dongfeng CSK002 Airborne Assault Vehicle (that’s AAV for those in the business). This is a vehicle with a smaller crew and trust us, you wouldn’t want to be the shooter. That’s because while the rest of the windows are bulletproof, that of the man who operates the front-mounted 30 mm machine gun is folded.
Other weaponry includes quadruple smoke grenade launchers, while the secondary hardware is a 12.7 mm machine gun - they all sit on the roof. Once again the protection seems poor, as this is operated by a soldier who has to exit through the roof.
Why are we not surprised about the fact that the Chinese military don’t appear to invest too much in protecting their troopers...
Yeah.  Are you getting the force of connection?  The Chinese have chosen mobility and firepower over armor ... at least when it comes to their expeditionary/rapid deployment forces.

This is telling.  When China goes to war, they will accept high casualties to accomplish whatever tactical/strategic objective.  We should plan accordingly.

Back to the vehicle.  A passenger mounted 30mm gun.  A roof mounted 12.7mm gun. The Chinese paratroopers will arrive violently.  To all my bubbas still in uniform.  Train harder.

Go-Pro BMD Heavy Drop!

Many thanks to Info Infanterie for the vid...

105mm Mobile Gun System program begins...


via Janes
A Brazilian Army programme to buy one prototype 105 mm turreted gun system, with the option for a pilot batch of about 13 systems, is expected to attract bids from several international companies.
Interested firms have until late December to formally issue a proposal, a source close to the programme told IHS Jane's on 17 November.
The source said that so far ARES Aeroespacial e Defesa (incorporating a 105mm gun of Israel Military Industries), China North Industries Corporation (NORINCO), CMI Defence, Denel Land Systems, and OTO Melara have obtained the Request for Proposal (RfP) issued by the army on 7 November.
This is freaking embarrassing.

Let me remind you of some unpleasant history.

The USMC started the Marine Personnel Carrier Program in 2008.  Killed it in 2012, revived it and in the video Amphibious Combat Vehicle Modernization stated that it COULD enter service as soon as 2019.  The video definitively stated that the AAV Upgrade program WOULD start in 2019.

In much less time the Brazilians will have their entire allotment of VBTP-MR's, will be well on the way to the 8x8 version and the 105mm Mobile Gun System will be getting their barrels shot out.

Embarrassing doesn't cut it.  This is humiliating.  Why can the Brazilians get it done but the USMC can't?

Canadian Exercise Steele Sabre...






Didn't know the Canadians still operated the Leopard C2's along with the C2A4's.

Pic of the day. B-1B Bomber doin' work!


Japanese F-35, MV-22 buy in jeopardy...this is why you follow economic issues!


via CNN
Tokyo (CNN) -- Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has called for snap parliamentary elections for next month, following news that the country had slipped into a recession.
Abe also announced an 18-month delay in a controversial sales tax hike during a press conference Tuesday.
That's the first paragraph of the article.  What follows should send chills up the spine of defense corporations selling the F-35, the program office and MV-22 fanboys....
The prime minister said he will dissolve the parliament's lower house on Friday.
The Japanese economy slipped into recession in the third quarter.
Basically the Japanese Prime Minister just did to the Japanese govt, what the US public did to the Obama administration.

They got rolled.

Slobber-knocked.

Repudiated.

But why this matters is because with the Japanese economy slipping back into recession, the defense buildup that Abe was pushing is now dead in the water.

This is why you follow economic issues if you're interested in defense.  But the Japanese shouldn't feel bad.  The same is coming to our shores.  Defense analyst, Congressional analyst and Senators/Representatives themselves have all said the same.

Sequestration will continue.

The ramp up of F-35 production WILL NOT HAPPEN.

The death spiral is here.

SIDENOTE: Have you been paying attention to the long shore-man's slowdown in Los Angeles?  This will not be a booming Christmas as some predicted.  Retailers have already missed delivery windows from China.  Because of that China will continue to slow.  Germany is already in recession and the bad news will arrive at our shores soon enough.  2015 will not be a good year.  My prediction?  2014 was just a break from bad economic news.

Wednesday, November 19, 2014

I just figured out what turns me off about the President's executive order on immigration...

If you watch the news then you're well aware that the President is going to announce his executive order  on illegal immigration.

I've heard the talking heads on both sides and while I believe his actions are illegal, I can see how they can "stretch" enough to think (meaning fool enough Americans) that the actions are good to go.

Put that aside for one minute.

I could look at this as being politics as usual for the Democrat party, but that isn't what has me turned off heading toward punching walls about this whole thing.

We have people that are in our country illegally demanding that we change our laws and allow them to profit from their illegality!

How do you maintain a nation of laws when those laws can be so easily put aside?  People that are not even citizens have gotten the attention of the President and he's about to act on their behalf while poll after poll shows that the American people are most concerned about the economy?

This is what he turns his attention to after being soundly defeated at the polls just a few weeks ago?

We're screwed.

Marine Corps Ship to Objective Maneuver is no longer valid.


A short conversation with USMC 0802 led me to this conclusion.  The USMC labored hard to produce a doctrine that is completely null and void.  In short the Ship to Objective Maneuver concept (STOM) is no longer valid.

Reference the video of the hour...ACV Ground Modernization.  One of the bullet points from the video is to use LCACs and JHSVs to carry the ACV from the sea base (which could be located up to and over 100 miles offshore) to a launch point approx 3 miles off shore and then they will do an "in stream" launch of the vehicles.

Think about that for one minute.

We're going to send LCACs and JHSVs...and possibly even updated LCUs into an area that is so heavily defended that we won't send our combat capable amphibious ships.  So instead we send these thin skinned, unarmed surface transports in!

That's insanity!

But it gets worse.  If you're a "seagoing 101st" Marine Corps advocate then consider the planning necessary to setup a corridor for the MV-22 to get to the LZ.  Not only will you have to knock out any and all anti-air capable systems (this will range from S-500/400/300 to shoulder launched missiles, to RPGs and then small arms) but you will also have to escort the V-22s to the landing area.  Remember that the MV/CV-22 had its skirt raised in Africa not too long ago when Navy SEALs flying aboard it got chewed up and they're lucky to not have died.  They only suffered terrible injuries...injuries so bad that they had to do an inflight blood transfusion to save the wounded.

But back to the insertion.  Marine planners have found that the AH-1Z is too slow to keep up with the V-22 and the F-35/Harriers are too fast.  So before you even get to mission planning on objective you have a tremendous logistical challenge to solve....and thats just with the aircraft involved.  Do you launch your V-22's first and have the F-35's arrive just before touch down?  Do you need to sanitize the area first?  What is your loiter time for close air support?  Oh and want a savage kick in the pants?  The average MEU will not have enough Fast Movers to maintain an effective cap and if the MEU/sea base is operating anywhere from 60-100 or more miles off shore then AH-1Zs will not be able to arrive to help with the work (Google the effective range and loiter time of a fully loaded Viper...you will be unpleasantly surprised)!

And then finally we get to the last leg of the STOM triad.  The EFV or as they call it now the ACV.  We've gone from having the Marine Personnel Carrier being a surrogate vehicle to it now becoming the actual replacement for the AAV!  What do we get for the inability to carry a full strength Marine Rifle Squad in each vehicle?

We get a ride that is wheeled (and I have yet to see documentation that wheels can go where tracks can), carries half the number of Marines that an AAV can, can go through the water at the same speed and is supposedly more mine resistant by virtue of it having higher ground clearance.

We labored hard to produce the Ship to Objective Maneuver concept but didn't do the work of seeing how the pieces would all fit together.

As much as I like the Havoc and SuperAV.  As much as I'm warming to the Terrex 2.  One thing is obvious and Marine Land is gonna hate me for it.

We need to fucking stop.

Think about the possible.

Think about the now.

And re-do our entire concept of operations.  The real answer is the old answer.  We are going to have to roll back enemy defenses.  We are going to have to have the US Navy big deck carriers on deck.  We are going to need major support from the Surface Navy.

If it is a contested landing...even if we land where they ain't...modern enemy defenses require that we neutralize the threat before we send forces ashore.

Old skool Marines know this.  We thought we knew better than they did and we were wrong.  We were so wrong.

NOTE:  Hindsight is 20/20.  When the EFV program collapsed, so did the STOM concept.  It got buried when the former Commandant started his diatribe of operating up to 100 miles off shore.  While I'm positive it was an attempt to explain his vacillation and indecision on the ACV...while at the same time promoting the use of the V-22, it instead condemned the Marine Corps to a delay in getting its messaging and doctrine straight.  STOM is dead.  The USMC family just needs to accept it.