Consider.
Every announcement from HQMC and think tanks lauds nothing but praise on two platforms...the F-35B and the MV-22.
Long gone are the days where the Marine and his rifle was the focus of HQMC and those that seek to give advice/counsel.
How is this showing up?
You spend money on whats important. You jettison anything you think is redundant or a waste...this applies double when times are tough. During these tough times what is the Marine Corps shedding? Infantry Battalions, Artillery, Tanks, Tracks and various support units.
What is increasing?
Marine Air.
But wait. It gets worse.
The F-35B is going to be declared operational and not only is the software a mess but not even the gun will be operational.
Check this out from the Daily Beast.
The Pentagon’s newest stealth jet, the nearly $400 billion Joint Strike Fighter, won’t be able to fire its gun during operational missions until 2019, three to four years after it becomes operational.
Even though the Joint Strike Fighter, or F-35, is supposed to join frontline U.S. Marine Corps fighter squadrons next year and Air Force units in 2016, the jet’s software does not yet have the ability to shoot its 25mm cannon. But even when the jet will be able to shoot its gun, the F-35 barely carries enough ammunition to make the weapon useful.
The JSF won’t be completely unarmed. It will still carry a pair of Raytheon AIM-120 AMRAAM long-range air-to-air missiles and a pair of bombs. Initially, it will be able to carry 1,000-pound satellite-guided bombs or 500-pound laser-guided weapons. But those weapons are of limited utility, especially during close-in fights.
“There will be no gun until [the Joint Strike Fighter’s Block] 3F [software], there is no software to support it now or for the next four-ish years,” said one Air Force official affiliated with the F-35 program. “Block 3F is slated for release in 2019, but who knows how much that will slip?”
So having said all of the above the question must be asked. Is Marine Air going rogue?
Once Marine Air was considered the keepers of the flame when it came to providing close air support.
Now?
They are talking about retiring early (even though NAVAIR says that it can be kept in frontline service til 2030..at least) the AV-8B Harrier...a plane that is proven, can provide the support that the GROUND COMBAT ELEMENT needs but isn't exactly designed to be part of the air sea battle doctrine that the USN and USAF are working on.
Is Marine Air attempting to not only break away from the ground side of the house but while doing so remake the Marine Corps in its image?