And yes, I'll say it, the EFV sure would be useful in the type of amphibious raid scenario we see in Libya where we do not want under any circumstances to have US Marines on land for longer than a single day at a time. The ability to rapidly move a Marine Rifle Company to shore from sea at sunset, roll into the city, blow up enemy equipment in an urban environment (hiding by a hospital, for example), hit a FARP, attack another couple targets, then pull back out to sea before daylight... EFV sure would be useful. I am not convinced the AAVs can do that, and if you send M1A1s and LAVs, you are staying longer than a single night because you can't get them on and off the shore fast enough.Let me just add this. It seems like our past is our future. During the 1930's the US Marines were involved in a series of small wars. While Afghanistan and Iraq don't qualify...conflicts like Libya do. These are the types of missions that the Marine Corps is expert at...these are the missions that will be our nations future.
UPDATE:
Galrahn also makes this tantalizing and fierce statement...
It is a true lack of respect for Europe how almost everyone interviewed on cable TV describes the European military capabilities as the punchline of a joke.Its not just me (talking to my readers in Europe). There is a feeling in the US amongst 'talking head' military experts that Europe is not adequately pulling its weight in even this limited war.
If Europe (as a whole) is going to take its proper place in the world then it might be time (especially in light of the Dutch and UK military cutbacks) for you to fully integrate your military forces.